As good an analysis as I've seen. Bush as initiator, Kerry as consolidator was a potentially powerful paradigm. And it would have enabled Kerry to portray Bush as spent; exhausted by the stress and bone-crushing pressures of the job. Americans were and are grateful to Bush for his superb leadership in the wake of 9/11. They were never going to fire him. They might have retired him. And I particularly like the comment about Edwards being "Quayle Light". WHat a horrible choice. He added nothing and, frankly, looked like an airheaded local TV anchor and proved again and again that he had a tin ear for the electorate. I know he now has plans to run in 2008 and I fervently wish the Democrats would nominate him, but the Hildabeest will run over a lightweight like him like a racoon under an Escalade. She'll barely feel the bump. http://techcentralstation.com/110504B.html
Did you see the James Carville article I linked to over in the Politics forum? Man, how I wish Ron Brown had been still alive to direct the party, and that when someone other than Kerry was nominated that Carville had been his campaign manager. I don't know who the candidate would've been, but it wouldn't have been Kerry.
Too bad the GOP had Ron Brown killed, huh? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA... BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA...