Now that most of the clamour to replace Sir Alex Ferguson has died down from those "fans" and pundits with short memories it seems appropriate to ask. I believe he is for many reasons: 1. He succeeded in breaking the auld firm domination in scotland with limited resources and a club with no history of success. 2. He took them to European glory. 3. He came to a high pressure job at United with huge expectations and exceeded them time and again. 4. He has created several teams which have dominated. 5. He has used youth systems, cast offs and superstars to build his teams. 6. The players who prove their continued loyalty and commitment are rewarded and protected. 7. He has worked with numerous assistants, chairmen, budgets and generations of players and always succeeded, especially when written off. So what do you think? Please vote and include an explanation with your post.