What do you think of our temp homes?

Discussion in 'San Jose Earthquakes' started by athletics68, Aug 29, 2007.

  1. sj_oldtimer

    sj_oldtimer Member

    Nov 18, 2005
    Clovis CA

    Nobody is going to upgrade it to 20,000 seats. It might get a temporary capacity of 12,000. It is not going to be the location of the new Quakes home, just a place for games for a season or two.
     
  2. CARLOS1

    CARLOS1 Member

    Aug 9, 2001
    Sunnyvale, CA
    Club:
    Real Betis
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    OK. Last post; The San Jose Earthquakes have won 2 league titles since MLS has been in business. WE CANNOT PLAY AT BUCKSHAW. The San Jose Earthquakes as well as their fans deserve a more fitting venue justifying our return.
     
  3. Goodsport

    Goodsport Moderator
    Staff Member

    May 18, 1999
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    But it is practically across the street from the upcoming permanent home of the San Jose Earthquakes. :cool:

    GO SAN JOSE EARTHQUAKES!!! [​IMG]


    -G
     
  4. Earthquake FC

    Earthquake FC Member

    Feb 7, 2006
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    If Wolff is considering Buck Shaw Stadium, SCU officials have the leverage. They have to know MLS will never see a 12,000 seat stadium as legitmate for their marketing purposes. If Bronco Bench is smart, SCU will demand 20K permanent range or no deal.
     
  5. SuperQuake

    SuperQuake New Member

    Jun 11, 2005
    Nop... it was over 100 degrees so it was a small crowd.
     
  6. sj_oldtimer

    sj_oldtimer Member

    Nov 18, 2005
    Clovis CA

    SCU isn't going to have that kind of clout with Lew Wolff. He has the option of playing all of the Quakes home games in Oakland. The baseball configuration there is much less of an issue than seats at Buck Shaw Stadium. In fact, that problem is already solved in MLS. Wolff can do what DC does....they play on a field that is also used for Major League Baseball.

    Beyond all of that, why on earth would Santa Clara University want a 20K seat stadium? That's more than twice as large as it's entire student body + faculty. They do not want a large stadium. I can see Wolff helping with upgrades that are definitely needed, but the permanent stadium seating is likely to be relatively small, maybe 8K at the most (more likely in the 5-7K range).

    It is not unprecedented in MLS for teams to play at temporary facilities that might be considered sub-standard. Dallas and Chicago come to mind immediately. The only way for the Quakes to return to a stadium that you seem to want is for them to wait until their new home is complete.....that would be at least 2010.
     
  7. sj_oldtimer

    sj_oldtimer Member

    Nov 18, 2005
    Clovis CA

    The Blackhawks also played at least one game at Buck Shaw Stadium. I don't think it was a league match....it was probably an Open Cup game...I remember it was against a team from the midwest, possibly even a team that usually played indoors. Pato Marjectic was on the team. I think Paul Mariner suited up for the Blackhawks in that game too.
     
  8. falvo

    falvo Member+

    Mar 27, 2005
    San Jose & Florence
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    Italy
    Actually during the 1992 APSL season they played more than one league match at SCU. I remember Mariner on the sideline with Calloway helping out as an assistant coach. He told sweeper Derek Van Rheenen to go up on either a corner or a free kick and he scored on a header I think it was. I think that was a league match there on July 4th of that year. I think they divided the season between SCU & Spartan.
     
  9. sj_oldtimer

    sj_oldtimer Member

    Nov 18, 2005
    Clovis CA

    I believe Spartan Stadium was unavailable for a few weeks because of some sort of construction or repairs. Mariner did not suit up for too many games, and the ones where he was active were not league games. As I start to think about it, the game against the team from the midwest might have been a Champions Cup game. The Blackhawks did very well in that competition. The other time I remember Mariner in a game was a Champions Cup game at Spartan Stadium against Club America. Mariner played the last 10 minutes or so.....the Blackhawks were winning the game but they were down a goal in aggregate, so they were desperately trying to get another goal. They won the game but lost the round.

    I am editing this to make a comment about the competitions available to the Blackhawks....they did not participate in any US Open Cup matches, as pro teams were not allowed in the Open Cup competition until 1995. Sorry to take this so far off topic...but the subjects seem to take on their own life sometimes.
     
  10. athletics68

    athletics68 Member+

    Dec 12, 2006
    San Diego & San Jose
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    And for games like KC anyway. The games that no one goes to besides the hardcore fans.
     
  11. falvo

    falvo Member+

    Mar 27, 2005
    San Jose & Florence
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    Italy
    Didn't the Chicago Fire play in a temp home at Cardinal Stadium in Naperville, Illinois for a while? From what I remember reading the stadium only holds 15,000 people.
     
  12. sj_oldtimer

    sj_oldtimer Member

    Nov 18, 2005
    Clovis CA

    I believe it was at a high school, as was Dallas for a couple of years.
     
  13. Goodsport

    Goodsport Moderator
    Staff Member

    May 18, 1999
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The Chicago Fire played two seasons in Naperville while Soldier Field was being renovated, and the then-Dallas Burn played one season in Southlake (the original plan was for two seasons) before temporarily moving back to the Cotton Bowl while Pizza Hut Park was being constructed.

    As for the San Jose Earthquakes, a 15k capacity temporary facility for the majority of home games would be workable, though at least 20k would be better. A sub-15k temp facility wouldn't be, though.

    GO SAN JOSE EARTHQUAKES!!! :cool:


    -G
     
  14. sj_oldtimer

    sj_oldtimer Member

    Nov 18, 2005
    Clovis CA
    If Buck Shaw Stadium is used, it will be a real effort to get 15K seats. Not impossible, but very difficult. Not only is there limited room, outdoor stadiums must also comply with local fire and emergency codes. I personally hope they can do 15K, but they have their work cut out.
     
  15. due time

    due time Member+

    Mar 1, 1999
    Santa Clara
    I've been going to Buck Shaw for years, but this weekend went with the thought in mind that the Quakes might be playing there. Also there's a few misconceptions floating around in this tread that I'll address as well. Here's my thoughts, as well as some background info:

    1) I know the website says Buck Shaw holds like 6500 in it's current configuration, but I really doubt it. There are only seats on one side and about 2/3 of one end line. 5000 max in my mind.

    2) Field is wider than Spartan although maybe not longer.

    3) I now have no expectation that ANY seats are going to be added by April 2008. Here's why. I had forgotten about the library. SCU is building a new library and it's temporarily housed in portables on the opposite side of the field between the turf and the big parking structure. That ain't gonna get moved until the library is done. I don't know exactly when that is, but just looking at it, I doubt next spring. Also the far end zone is their practice field. They won't sacrofice that. So no additional seating.

    4) SCU would like to renovate Buck Shaw to make it a soccer stadium, but no way do they need or want anything close to what you guys are talking about. I think they'd be perfectly happy with a 5k stadium. I've heard that the women's coach would like to take out the existing end zone seating to move the field farther North (and I'm speculating maybe make it a bit longer).

    Bottom line: many of you are going to be unhappy if the Quakes play there. But it probably does suit Wolff better than dealing with SJSU.

    As a side note, I paid particular attention to airport noise. It was really, really minimal. I could see airplanes approach, but never heard them land. Occasionally I heard a plane take off, but it must have been only a few older, louder planes, because it wasn't often. I know the new stadium will be about halfway closer to the runways than Buck Shaw, but I'm convinced it's a non-issue.
     
  16. falvo

    falvo Member+

    Mar 27, 2005
    San Jose & Florence
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    Italy
    kind of....
    was used by the Chicago Fire in 2002 and 2003, when it was known as Cardinal Stadium.
    Benedetti-Wehrli Stadium

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benedetti-Wehrli_Stadium
     
  17. JazzyJ

    JazzyJ BigSoccer Supporter

    Jun 25, 2003
    I took a visit to the field also, last month, and I have similar impressions. However, I'm not convinced that you can't (or you wouldn't necessarily) move the temporary library portables. Seems like there's enough space for another location, and they call them "portables" for a reason.

    My main impression is that the pitch is fine, assuming the length is OK. It was in excellent condition when I saw it. Seating and concessions / bathrooms would be the main problem. And something would have to be done with that "junior high school wood shop project" press box thing. There would be a lot of work to do, and if they are going to play any games at Buck Shaw in '08, I would think that it would have to start soon.

    Any chance that Wolff's "no Spartan" position is a bluff / posturing for a better deal? I think probably not, since I don't think SJSU cares enough about the money they'd make on having the Quakes back there for another couple years. You can't bluff someone when they don't really care about what it is you're bluffing over.
     
  18. Albany58

    Albany58 Member+

    Sep 14, 1999
    Concord, CA USA
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I don't think he's bluffing. The reason: When he said that he wouldn't deal with them, he didn't make much of it, just an off-hand remark, sort of. I think he'd been a little clearer if he was setting it up for negotiations. JMTC.
     
  19. living_ded_boy

    living_ded_boy New Member

    May 24, 2001
    Pleasanton, Ca

    I agree.....aaaaaand, I get the feeling that SJSU has made it clear that their terms are non-negotiable......so why waste time? I like Spartan Stadium but F-them if they don't want to play nice. They are probably most of the reason that AEG wouldn't hang in there til a stadium deal was worked out. Look on the bright side....no AEG and no SJSU. Fresh start!
     
  20. sj_oldtimer

    sj_oldtimer Member

    Nov 18, 2005
    Clovis CA
    The fewer outside pressures, the better.
     

Share This Page