WCQ Semi-Finals Fixtures?

Discussion in 'Canada' started by thethinwhiteduke, Jun 26, 2008.

  1. thethinwhiteduke

    Feb 13, 2008
    hello all,
    i was curious as to when you, the experts, would anticipate that the fixtures for the semi-finals of WCQ would be finalized? i am a US supporter but went to the match in Montreal vs SVaG and had a great time. im thinking of attending the Canadian qualifier on 9/6 (since the US will be in Cuba) just wanted to make sure the whens/wheres of it. thanks!
     
  2. themodelcitizen

    Jul 23, 2000
    BMO Field - Sec. 114
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    that game (home to Honduras) is likely to be in Montreal.
     
  3. Polygong

    Polygong Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 8, 2007
    Toronto
    Club:
    Toronto FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Canada
    Seems like Saputo is the new home for the natiopnal team, though Commonwealth Stadium in Edmonton has been a popular stop for them too so I'd expect to see them there as well.
     
  4. SoccerNewf

    SoccerNewf Member

    Jan 16, 2007
    Pasadena, NL
    This is what I have been hearing so far:

    [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica]Jamaica @ Toronto on August 20th
    Honduras @ Montreal on September 6th
    Mexico @ Edmonton on October 15th

    Apparently this is tentative, so don't take this as the final schedule but I would say their is a good chance this is how it will look.

    When I say tentative, I should explain I mean the venues and not the dates. They are basically set in stone.
    [/FONT]
     
  5. The Truth Commission

    Mar 29, 2000
    Parts Unknown
    They'd play in Edmonton before Vancouver?

    BOO.

    I was hoping to make a trip up north to see them. Oh well, perhaps they'll qualify for the finals in 2009/2010.
     
  6. Polygong

    Polygong Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 8, 2007
    Toronto
    Club:
    Toronto FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Canada
    Having the Jamaica game in Toronto is a bad idea. There's a huge Jamaican population here and it would probably compromise Canada's home advantage for that game. I'm surprised that BMO is even being considered with the Field Turf fiasco and all. Wouldn't be at all surprised if that game were moved to Vancouver.

    Smart idea playing Mexico in Edmonton in October, hopefully temperatures colder than the Mexicans are used to will help us get something from that game.

    They have one of the best, if not the best, stadiums in the country.
     
  7. Kingston

    Kingston Member+

    Oct 6, 2005
    Commonwealth Stadium capacity 60 081
    Swangard Stadium capacity 6868

    Vancouver really does need to get that new stadium built.
     
  8. SoccerNewf

    SoccerNewf Member

    Jan 16, 2007
    Pasadena, NL
    I believe it has to due with the fact that the Impact have a home game on that date. There is talks of moving that game to another date to accommodate the Canada game though. Have to see what happens, apparently the national team players want to play all their games at Saputo.
     
  9. Kingston

    Kingston Member+

    Oct 6, 2005
    Saputo has the advantages of natural grass and a time zone that is (for Canada) relatively close to Europe. That said, the CSA has contractual obligations to play some games at the new stadium in Toronto. In addition, regardless of the wishes of the players, I can't see the national team playing in only one venue when we have several others that can be used. It's not like we're a small country where fans from all regions could easily travel to one central stadium for matches.
     
  10. TFC07

    TFC07 Member

    May 19, 2007
    Brampton, Ontario
    Nat'l Team:
    Canada
    I personally don't mind if Canada decides not to play at BMO field at all. This will send a clear message to city of Toronto to get rid of field turf.
     
  11. Viruk42

    Viruk42 New Member

    Jul 23, 2007
    Ottawa

    Rumour has it (I forget where this came from, might have been the Footy Show podcast, but it also could have been tsn/sportsnet or some forums...) that the deal with BMO is for "Team Canada". It doesn't talk about whether it's a friendly with Christmas Island, or a World Cup qualifier against Mexico. It doesn't talk about whether it's the Men's team, or the Men's under-20 team. It also doesn't talk about whether it's Men's or Womens.

    Or so I hear.

    The point is that this could mean that Canada could play the Qualifiers in Montreal (or Edmonton), while BMO gets most/all the other, less important, games.
     
  12. Moaca

    Moaca Member

    Mar 8, 2006
    Just needs to be be six games a year, CWNT, U23, U20, doesn't matter who it is.

    The senior men would be lucky to play six games a year period.
     
  13. Polygong

    Polygong Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 8, 2007
    Toronto
    Club:
    Toronto FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Canada
    That said, this country as a whole needs more worthwhile stadiums, two (Saputo and Commonwealth) aren't enough. BMO could be a third if they changed the pitch to grass, and hopefully Vancouver will have one soon.
     
  14. thethinwhiteduke

    Feb 13, 2008
    thanks for the great info and insight. i wont book anything yet, but a return trip to Montreal would certainly be great.....
     
  15. nfitz

    nfitz Member

    Aug 20, 2007
    Toronto
    After watching the Galaxy/Vancouver game at Commonwealth stadium, I can't understand for a minute why one would consider it a world-class pitch! The players were complaining that the surface at BC Place was better.
     
  16. street

    street New Member

    Feb 18, 2008
  17. nfitz

    nfitz Member

    Aug 20, 2007
    Toronto
    Damn - I'm at a conference in Boston ... I'll have to figure out how I can get computer access. I wonder if there will be any presales.

    Interesting to see that they are now calling it BMO Field rather than "The National Soccer Stadium".
     
  18. Daniel from Montréal

    Aug 4, 2000
    Montréal
    Club:
    Montreal Impact
    Nat'l Team:
    Canada
    CIBC used to be a CSA sponsor, and FIFA don't allow for corporate names of stadiums for their competitions, which is why it was the NSS in 2007.
     

Share This Page