The Palestinian flag - a symbol of freedom in Europe?

Re: The Palestinian flag had become a symbol of freedom in Europe

I think you're in the wrong forum.

Also, when you find the right forum, do elaborate on this.

 

Re: The Palestinian flag had become a symbol of freedom in Europe

wow that's interesting, I didn't know that
so let me sum this up:
israelis+sionists = villains
streakers with palestinians flags = good guys
and I thought geopolitics was complicated, silly me

 

Re: The Palestinian flag had become a symbol of freedom in Europe

Here we go....

Go Ghana!!!

 

This should be fun.....

 

Or not...

 

Call it stress therapy

 

Re: The Palestinian flag had become a symbol of freedom in Europe

Tell Hamas to finally stop violence and accept a peace process ... then you surely will get better playgrounds in the nearest future!

 

Re: The Palestinian flag had become a symbol of freedom in Europe

What's wrong with that one?

 

Ok Mr. Palestine, let me ask you this. Why is all the hate from Palestinian's directed at Israel when it was Jordan and Egypt that took the land that was intended to form Palestine? Also why are Palestinian's treated as less then equal in other Arab states? That is my perception anyway of how they are treated. They live in refugee camps, yet really they are Arab just like the people from the countries they are residing in now.

Now don't get me wrong, I understand the issues and why Israel is blamed, but I don't understand why Israel are the only ones blamed when they shouldn't be.

 

Some of the history of the situation:

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=22564

http://www.un.org/depts/dpa/ngo/history.html

It is clear that Egypt and Jordan contributed greatly to there not being a Palestine state.

Interesting that Israel lived up to there end while no recognition of Israel has been given.



http://www.mideastweb.org/timeline.htm

A good timeline here.

 

Re: The Palestinian flag had become a symbol of freedom in Europe

But hey, at least you've still got internet access.

 

this is BS. propaganda. It is BS in the sense that it uses some real facts it exaggerates them greatly to suggest the nonsensical notion that palestinians don't exist and never existed and they are "arabs" from somewhere else. thus immigrants like the jewish settlers.

One can be proisraeli/antipalestinian without resorting to this kind of trash.

now we are making sense. mideastweb is the best source out there.

But it's a real waste to use it only for the timeline.

http://www.mideastweb.org/nutshell.htm

http://www.mideastweb.org/briefhistory.htm

 

Scarecrow, if you really want to get into the legal nitty gritty, why don't you bring up the Palestinian Wall Opinion, or the Israeli Supreme Court decision, or the recent report on the Israeli settlements? It is largely agreed that anything Israel has occupied post 1967 is illegal under international law; the only reason people even refer to 1967 is because of Bush is now calling the current situation as "realities on the ground"; on a purely legal perspective, anything beyond the 1947 is illegal.

This is not going into the history of it all; and there is no requirement of recognition of Israel before Israel has to withdraw from illegally occupied land. It is wrong and illegal irrespective of any other action or inaction by others.

Finally, historically, one of the main reasons of the defeat of the "Arab" armies was exactly because they each wanted to carve Palestine for themselves. In a way it also proves that there is no common Arabian identity; there is Syria, Egypt, Lebanon... I often mention about how the Jews in the WWII got screwed by all European countries (and America), and then later got screwed by the Jews too; the same thing applies for the Palestinian; they've been getting screwed by everyone: Jews, Arabs and others with "vested interests".

 

Of course in regards to 67, if the Arabs hadn't been illegally waging a war of destruction against Israel, Israel would not have had the need to crush there weak armies and take the land in question now would they?

Wars are fought and land is won and lost. This has been true throughout the history of man. What happened in 67 is no different. Of course Israel has been willing to return land in turn for peace. Just ask Egypt about this. Even now Israel is neg. with Syria with the return of the Golan Heights involved.

Of course Israel also gave Gaza back and we see how that turned out.

Oh !bob, provide some links for your opening statement. If they really are relevant then we should read about it.

 

Well do provide a link, other then wiki, to support your claim. Palestinians are Arabs. Are you really saying they aren't?

I use mideastweb.org all the time.

 

http://www.mideastweb.org/nutshell.htm

I guess they really are Arab.....

 

We can argue about the chicken and the egg until we are blue in the face and we have done so in the past many times, but this is an intersting topic that we should stick to. Why are Europeans so crazy, suddenly, about the Palestinian casuse? Of course, their "love" for Jews and Israel has always been "questionable", but what the hell do these guilty liberal Europeans have to do with Palestinians?