http://news.morningstar.com/doc/document/print/1,3651,121436,00.html Sachin's post reminded me of this-I was curious about how applicable his strategy his to your average individual investor. The subject of diversity always comes up with Buffett: I'm pretty much in this school with my own portfolio; with two stocks that make up a good part of my portfolio, Anheuser-Busch and Illinois Toolworks, his point about volatility has shown to be spot-on. (I have additional investments in mutal funds, IRA, etc. This is just a personal portfolio of 12 positions that I've been building on for some time.) Still, I wondered what some people thought about his overall views and to what degree are they applicable to average investors. Here's the list of his 28 positions at the close of 2004: American Express AXP: Wide Moat, 3 Stars Coca-Cola KO: Wide Moat, 5 Stars Gillette G: Wide Moat, 2 Stars Wells Fargo WFC: Wide Moat, 3 Stars Wesco Financial WSC: Narrow Moat, 3 Stars Moody's MCO: Wide Moat, 2 Stars Washington Post WPO: Wide Moat, 3 Stars Petrochina Company PTR: Narrow Moat, 1 Star H&R Block HRB: Wide Moat, 3 Stars M&T Bank MTB: Narrow Moat, 3 Stars HCA HCA: No Moat, 1 Star Nike NKE: Narrow Moat, 2 Stars Shaw Communications SJR: Not Rated First Data FDC: Wide Moat, 4 Stars Gap GPS: Narrow Moat, 4 Stars Gannett GCI: Narrow Moat, 3 Stars Costco Wholesale COST: Narrow Moat, 3 Stars USG USG: Not Rated Iron Mountain IRM: Wide Moat, 5 Stars Comcast CMCSA: Wide Moat, 3 Stars Pier 1 Imports PIR: No Moat, 3 Stars American Standard Companies ASD: No Moat, 2 Stars Torchmark TMK: Narrow Moat, 2 Stars Outback Steakhouse OSI: No Moat, 3 Stars Mueller Industries MLI: Not Rated ServiceMaster SVM: Narrow Moat, 1 Star Sealed Air SEE: Narrow Moat, 3 Stars Comdisco Holding Company CDCO: Not Rated
7 years ago, I would have liked his theory but things have happened in the industry that make me scared to have too much money in any one stock. Its not that I am afraid that a company would have wild swing in their revenue or expenses, its more the fact that one idiot can "Enron" a company and leave an investor holding the bag. This is a "risk" I never would have considered too heavily in the early 90's and yet I think this is a new risk that needs to be thought about when investing in only a couple of stocks. Andy
fair point. I guess what I really meant to say was that the risks are outside of just how the business itself performs. Andy
Well, one of the biggest problems I have seen for the average investor is to get whipsawed out of their holdings.. It doesnt matter how good the company is if the institutional holders and hedge funds are pounding the stock... I have seen great companies with great prospects plummet on rumors and panic selling, only to rebound to the sky after a few months... The average joe, cann no longer take the pain, sells right into the temporary bottom..
Bought Berkshire-B pre bubble burst and am up big (only wish I'd bought more). Rather than play the strategy why not let the World's best investor do it for you?
I think that that only reemphasizes Buffett's point. Only invest in what you know. Then invest with conviction. Buffett is old. He's chosen Lou Simpson to take over for him, but Lou only invests GEICO's investment portfolio. He's still pretty good, but he's not Buffett. Buffett would (and has) argued that you should have uncovered many of these shenanigans before you made your investment. In fact, should only consider an investment after properly researching a company.
I don't think its fair to expect regular people to uncover shenanigans when many of the full time, highly paid fund managers could not even uncover them. Andy
And he was old in 2000 when I bought. I'm not worried about something happening to Warren... and God forbid if something did happen I imagine I'd increase my position since the "Buffet premium" would be removed from the stock price.
Your right, it's not fair. But if you want to hold non-diversified equity positions (and make money) many would argue that it is necessary. Otherwise buy the index and enjoy a "safe" return. Very few fund managers actually do or have staff do research into companies' financial statements. They are far too busy trying to mimic the S&P 500. It is not possible to look indepth into the number of positions that most mutual funds have. This is typically the realm of hedge funds. That being said, people did find problems with Tyco, Worldcom, Enron, and Adelphia all long before the market realize it. Sixty minutes even did a couple of pieces on Worldcom. It's possible, it just requires work. A good starting point is Financial Shenanigans by Howard Schilit
Bingo. What many dont realize is that there is an information network that exist where these PM's make decisions off of. They spin it however they like, but many decisions are based off of inside information. Like it or not, they do it. "SAC" one of the most successfull hedge funds based out of CT, prides themselves on information. They get the FIRST call from the BEST analysts and act on it b/4 anyone else has it. read this.......... http://webuser.bus.umich.edu/Organizations/investmentclub/SAC.doc
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...p/20050421/ap_on_bi_ge/anheuser_busch_buffett Well, if you see my first post... Thanks WB
You mean... determine an actual value of the company by opening up its financial statements and doing some valuations, investigate both its and its industry's outlook, and see if you're buying something for close to what it's actually worth? Where's the fun in that?
http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2015/02/27/the-fate-of-the-berkshire-mill/?mod=yahoo_hs large parts of the original Berkshire mill complex remain. The headquarters building was taken down to build more parking for the other commercial buildings, where Mr. Letendre rents out space to roughly 20 tenants and runs his own company, which he said makes “leather goods and products for the military.” Those remaining buildings represent the majority of the square footage that Mr. Letendre acquired when he purchased the mill from Berkshire in 2000 for $215,000. There’s history in those buildings too. But they’re not for sale.
While Berkshire Hathaway may be overpriced, I believe it has a premium based off of Warren Buffett being in charge. In other words, when he passes away or retires I think there will be downward pressure upon the share price of A and B shares. However the Berkshire Hathaway portfolio/strategy is a pretty good one. Whilst I don't "know" this will happen, my thought is that when Mr. Buffett does pass away or retire, let the price fall its 10% in the general scramble of investors worried about the effect on the company and then it becomes a good buying opportunity. The only fool I've ever heard of who bought BRKA or BRKB was the one who was looking for their dividends. (this was a caller to Mad Money.......Kramer thought it was a prank and moved on) "buy what you know" has worked for Warren Buffett and Peter Lynch. Both those guys know what they are doing.
report record quarterly profit on Friday because of a pretax gain of about $7 billion on a stake in Kraft Heinz Co. Buffett helped finance the merger that created the food company and Berkshire became its largest shareholder in July. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...gain-on-kraft-heinz-masks-stock-market-lapses