The 2013 Table - Magic Numbers, Tragic Numbers & Other Fishy Figures [R]

Discussion in 'MLS: News & Analysis' started by Knave, Aug 23, 2013.

Tags:
  1. henryo

    henryo Member+

    Jun 26, 2007
    Just to expand more details on the Season-on-Season Drop-Offs, both by Points and by Positions:
    Largest Drop-offs each Season (By Points and Positions):
    Season By Points Team By Positions Team Remarks
    96-97 -13 T.B. -4 S.J. T.B. – Made Playoffs as 2nd in the East,
    S.J. – Won Wooden Spoon
    97-98 -17 K.C. -9 K.C. K.C. – Last in the West
    98-99 -24 N.Y. -6 N.Y. N.Y. – Won Wooden Spoon
    99-00 -27 D.C. -10 D.C. D.C. – Last in the East, as defending SS Winners
    00-01 -34 T.B. -8 T.B. T.B. – Won Wooden Spoon
    01-02 -16 CHI. -5 CHI. CHI. – Made Playoffs as 4th in the East
    02-03 -20 DAL. -8 L.A. DAL. – Won Wooden Spoon,
    L.A. - Made Playoffs as 4th in the West
    03-04 -20 CHI. -9 CHI. CHI. – Won Wooden Spoon, as defending SS Winners
    04-05 -11 CLB. -9 CLB. CLB. – Last in the East, as defending SS Winners
    05-06 -11 N.E. -4 K.C. N.E. - Made Playoffs as 2nd in the East
    06-07 -8 DAL. -3 DAL. & CHI. Both DAL. & CHI. still made Playoffs
    07-08 -18 D.C. -9 D.C. D.C. – Missed Playoffs, as defending SS Winners
    08-09 -18 N.Y. -7 K.C. & N.Y. N.Y. won Wooden Spoon
    09-10 -18 D.C. -9 HOU. & CHV. CHV. – Last in West
    10-11 -8 S.J. -7 N.Y. N.Y. still made Playoffs
    11-12 -13 L.A./DAL. -9 DAL. L.A. still made Playoffs and won MLS Cup, as defending SS Winners!
    12-13 -42 D.C. -16 D.C. D.C. – Won Wooden Spoon

    Most "largest drop-off"s by Points:
    Team Drop-offs by Points Remarks
    D.C. 4 All by Themselves!
    DAL. 3 (1 shared with L.A.)
    N.Y. 2
    T.B. 2
    CHI. 2
    CLB. 1
    K.C. 1
    N.E. 1
    S.J. 1
    L.A. 1 (shared with DAL.)

    Most "largest drop-off"s by Positions:
    Team Drop-offs by Positions Remarks
    D.C. 3 All by Themselves!
    CHI. 3 (1 shared with DAL.)
    K.C. 3 (1 shared with N.Y.)
    N.Y. 3 (1 shared with K.C.)
    DAL. 2 (1 shared with CHI.)
    CLB. 1
    L.A. 1
    S.J. 1
    T.B. 1
    CHV. 1 (shared with HOU.)
    HOU. 1 (shared with CHV.)


    Quick Notes:
    1. In the 17 cross-seasons examined:
    - 12 seasons (70.59%) have seen the same team(s) with largest drop-offs both by points & positions.
    - 5 seasons (29.41%) have seen completely different teams with largest drop-offs by points & positions.

    2. 2013 is indeed a Record-Breaking Season, with D.C. setting the largest drop-offs by Points (-42) and Position (-16), well done!

    3. Unless otherwise stated, most of these teams did suffer from disappointing seasons, either by:
    - Winning the Wooden Spoon
    - Finishing Last in their Conferences
    - Missing the Playoffs
    - Being eliminated in early rounds of Playoffs

    4. The only exception being L.A. in 2012, who despite the largest drop-off in points (mainly due to an almost record breaking in 2011), not only made the playoffs, but went all the way to win the MLS Cup as well!!
     
    Neuwerld and profiled repped this.
  2. henryo

    henryo Member+

    Jun 26, 2007
    @Hachiko should be delighted with another accolade for L.A., :)
     
    Hachiko repped this.
  3. Hachiko

    Hachiko The Akita on Big Soccer

    Jun 8, 2005
    Long Beach, CA
    Club:
    Los Angeles Galaxy
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    :cool:
     
    henryo repped this.
  4. henryo

    henryo Member+

    Jun 26, 2007
    Special Updates for @Knave:

    In terms of the Largest Cross-Seasons Drop-off by Points, D.C. currently hold 2 out of the Top-3 Spots:
    • Gold: -42 points by 12-13 D.C.
    • Silver: -38 points by 00-01 T.B. (Minor Correction for @Neuwerld here, :p)
    • Bronze: -27 points by 99-00 D.C.
    Now, in terms of the Largest Cross-Seasons Drop-off by Positions, D.C. have gone one better by holding all the Top-3 Spots!!!
    • Gold: -16 positions by 12-13 D.C.
    • Silver: -10 positions by 99-00 D.C. too...
    • Bronze: -9 positions by 07-08 D.C. again!!
      (jointly with a few other teams, i.e. 97-98 K.C., 03-04 CHI., 04-05 CLB., 09-10 HOU. & CHV., and 11-12 DAL.)
     
  5. Knave

    Knave Member+

    May 25, 1999
    I hate this thread.
     
    fuzzx, sitruc, Neuwerld and 1 other person repped this.
  6. Yoshou

    Yoshou Fan of the CCL Champ

    May 12, 2009
    Seattle
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    You started it... Literally
     
    fuzzx, sitruc, AndyMead and 3 others repped this.
  7. henryo

    henryo Member+

    Jun 26, 2007
  8. Knave

    Knave Member+

    May 25, 1999
    Things are funny like that.
     
    henryo repped this.
  9. Yoshou

    Yoshou Fan of the CCL Champ

    May 12, 2009
    Seattle
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Life is suffering, eh?
     
    Sounders78 and Knave repped this.
  10. henryo

    henryo Member+

    Jun 26, 2007
  11. Neuwerld

    Neuwerld Member+

    Oct 15, 2007
    California
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Good catch. 52-14=38. Stupid calculator. :D
     
    henryo repped this.
  12. henryo

    henryo Member+

    Jun 26, 2007
    #912 henryo, Nov 7, 2013
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2013
    At the other side of the coin of the "Largest Drop-offs" by @Neuwerld, was compelled to work out the numbers for the "Lagest Shoot-ups" as well, and here you go!!


    Largest Shoot-ups across Seasons, by Points & Positions (SS Standings):
    Season By Points Team By Positions Team Remarks
    96-97 +9 D.C. & COL. +3 K.C. & COL. D.C. – Won the SS,
    COL. – Made MLSC Final,
    K.C. – Topped the West
    97-98 +22 L.A. +3 L.A. & N.Y. L.A. – Won the SS
    98-99 +14 DAL. +4 DAL.
    99-00 +39 N.Y. +10 K.C. K.C. – Won the SS & MLSC,
    N.Y. – Topped the East
    00-01 +16 S.J. +9 MIA. & S.J. MIA. – Won the SS,
    S.J. – Won MLSC
    01-02 +20 COL. +7 COL.
    02-03 +16 CHI. +6 CHI. CHI. – Won the SS & Made MLSC Final
    03-04 +13 DAL. +7 CLB. CLB. – Won the SS
    04-05 +26 S.J. & N.E. +7 N.E. S.J. – Won the SS,
    N.E. – Topped the East & Made MLSC Final
    05-06 +25 CHV. +6 CHV. CHV.
    06-07 +10 CHV. +4 CHV. CHV. – Topped the West
    07-08 +20 CLB. +5 RSL. CLB. – Won the SS & MLSC
    08-09 +15 L.A. +11 L.A. L.A. – Topped the West & Made MLSC Final
    09-10 +30 N.Y. +12 N.Y. N.Y. – Topped the East
    10-11 +17 PHI. & D.C. +6 HOU. & PHI. HOU. – Made MLSC Final,
    D.C. – Still Missed Playoffs
    11-12 +28 S.J. +13 S.J. S.J. – Won the SS
    12-13 +23 POR. +14 POR. POR. – Topped the West
    (Playoffs in Progress)



    Most "Largest Shoot-Up"s by Points:
    Team Shoot-Ups by Points Remarks
    S.J. 3 (1 shared with N.E.)
    CHV. 2 The only team with Largest Shoot-ups in Successive Seasons!!
    DAL. 2
    L.A. 2
    N.Y. 2
    COL. 2 (1 shared with D.C.)
    D.C. 2 (1 shared with COL., 1 shared with PHI.)
    CHI. 1
    CLB. 1
    N.E. 1
    POR. 1
    PHI. 1 (1 shared with D.C.)



    Most "Largest Shoot-Up"s by Positions:
    Team Shoot-Ups by Positions Remarks
    K.C. 2 (1 shared with COL.)
    COL. 2 (1 shared with K.C.)
    L.A. 2 (1 shared with N.Y.)
    N.Y. 2 (1 shared with L.A.)
    DAL. 1
    CLB. 1
    N.E. 1
    CHV. 2
    RSL. 1
    POR. 1
    MIA. 1 (1 shared with S.J.)
    S.J. 2 (1 shared with MIA.)
    HOU. 1 (1 shared with PHI.)
    PHI. 1 (1 shared with HOU.)



    Quick Notes:
    1. In the 17 cross-seasons examined:
    - 14 seasons (82.35%) have seen the same team(s) with largest shoot-ups both by points & positions.
    - 3 seasons (17.65%) have seen completely different teams with largest shoot-ups by points & positions.

    2. As with the case of the Largest Drop-offs, Canadian teams do not feature among the Largest Shoot-ups too.

    3. For @Hachiko’s info, S.J. have the most number of Shoot-ups by Points (3), while several teams (Colorado [to the delight of @JasonMa], K.C., L.A., N.Y.) share the most number of Shoot-ups by Positions (2).

    4. Again, for @Hachiko, it is worth noting that Chivas USA were the only team to record the Largest Shoot-Ups in Successive Seasons (2005-06-07), a feat unlikely to be repeated in the seasons to come, ever.

    5. The Top-3 records for the Largest Shoot-ups across Seasons, by Points:
    • Gold: +39 points by 99-00 N.Y.
    • Silver: +30 points by 09-10 N.Y.
    • Bronze: +28 points by 11-12 S.J.
    (N.Y. occupying the Top-2 spots should be of much dismay to @Knave
    But D.C. will have a chance to top N.Y., if they amass more than 55 points in 2014, for a Shoot-Up of at least 40 pointss between 2013-14, :))

    6. The Top-3 records for the Largest Shoot-ups across Seasons, by Positions:
    • Gold: +14 points by 12-13 POR.
    • Silver: +13 points by 11-12 S.J.
    • Bronze: +12 points by 09-10 N.Y.
    (N.Y. occupying 3rd-spot should be of much dismay to @Knave as well…
    Again, D.C. will have a chance to top N.Y., if they finish better than 6th-place overall in 2014, for a Shoot-Up of at least 13 positions between 2013-14, :p)

    7. Unless otherwise stated, most of these teams did enjoy hugely successful seasons, either by:
    • Winning the MLS Cup,
    • Making the MLS Cup Final,
    • Winning the Supporters’ Shield,
    • Topping their respective Conferences, or:
    • At least making the Playoffs after missing it in the previous season(s).
    8. The only exception being D.C. in 2011, who remain the one and only team to date to miss the playoffs, despite the largest Shoot-Ups in points from previous season, mainly due to a (worst) records-breaking season in 2010.
    (Again, this won’t go down well with @Knave too… :cool:)
     
    redinthemorning, Totoro, Knave and 3 others repped this.
  13. Hachiko

    Hachiko The Akita on Big Soccer

    Jun 8, 2005
    Long Beach, CA
    Club:
    Los Angeles Galaxy
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  14. Totoro

    Totoro Member+

    Dec 3, 2009
    Colorado
    The Rapids had a couple of big wins where fans though perhaps they'd turned a corner:

    1) June 29 at Montreal: 4-3 win
    The Rapids had hit the skids and the season appeared to be getting away from them. They had lost a USOC match 3-1 to Orlando, tied Dallas at home, then lost 3 straight, to San Jose, Chicago and Portland, and now had to face the #1 team in the East on the road.

    Instead the Rapids rallied for a big win and there was much rejoicing among Rapids fans. Little did we know this was at the start of a long mediocre run by Montreal (23 points in 22 games including the Rapids game).

    2) Oct 5 vs Seattle: 5-1 win
    Seattle came in unbeaten in 7 games and this huge win seemed like the Rapids' coming out party. This game started a 4 game Seattle losing streak where they were outscored 12-2. JasonMa started posting "The Rapids broke the Sounders." Unfortunately the Sounders look like they were already broken as the Rapids went back to their good but not great level of play.
     
    henryo and JasonMa repped this.
  15. henryo

    henryo Member+

    Jun 26, 2007
    With the loss to Houston (#9 Seed), N.Y. (as #1 Seed) have also set a new record for the Largest Playoffs Upset in MLS History, topping the previous records of "#8 upset #1 Seed" in 2005, 2009 & 2012:

     
    gremio1903 and sitruc repped this.
  16. gremio1903

    gremio1903 Member+

    Aug 10, 2011
    Uruguaiana, RS (BRA) [last: Rockville, MD]
    Club:
    Gremio Porto Alegre
    One must be really good to achieve that. Real talent. I am proud!
     
    henryo repped this.
  17. GreatGonzo

    GreatGonzo Member+

    Jul 1, 1999
    MA
    Club:
    Colorado Rapids
    I have a request - can someone put together a table based on how teams did against the 10 playoff teams? If someone has already done that, can they point me in that direction? I don't have the data easily available to do that myself at the moment.
     
    henryo repped this.
  18. henryo

    henryo Member+

    Jun 26, 2007
    Interesting idea!!

    Found a related thread on this for 2010:
    https://www.bigsoccer.com/community/threads/playoff-teams-only-table.1575909/

    Haven't got anything on other seasons yet... Any one mind help? :)
     
  19. Knave

    Knave Member+

    May 25, 1999
    Do you mean a table like I have above for the top 16, but this time for the top 10 only? Or do you mean the bottom 9 versus the top 10? Or do you mean all 19 but only versus the top 10?
     
    henryo repped this.
  20. henryo

    henryo Member+

    Jun 26, 2007
  21. Knave

    Knave Member+

    May 25, 1999
    If nobody else does it first, I'll try to do it tonight.
     
    jayd8888 and henryo repped this.
  22. GreatGonzo

    GreatGonzo Member+

    Jul 1, 1999
    MA
    Club:
    Colorado Rapids
    #922 GreatGonzo, Nov 8, 2013
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2013
    All 19 against the top 10. If it's easier just to do the top 10 against each other, that's fine. I would probably have time to do it tomorrow. Your post on the standings minus Toronto / Chivas / DC and particularly how Seattle was affected made me wonder how the playoff teams fared against each other. Seattle's last 7 games included 6 games against playoff teams. They went 0-3-3 in those games. In their first 5 games of the season, they went 0-2-2 against playoff teams (and then beat Colorado in the following game, but I'm going to pick sets to fit my narrative). Obviously, things went a little bit better in the middle part of the season, but that's 10 games against playoff teams that Seattle didn't win.
     
    JasonMa, Knave and henryo repped this.
  23. henryo

    henryo Member+

    Jun 26, 2007
    Can't wait!!

    Even better if some trendings on this can be derived from the past seasons too (e.g. how many previous MLSC Winners have topped such Standings), though it's a sizeable task...
     
  24. Yoshou

    Yoshou Fan of the CCL Champ

    May 12, 2009
    Seattle
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I read somewhere that Seattle had a .5 PPG against either playoff teams, or the 4 other Western Conference teams.. I can't remember which it was though.
     
  25. henryo

    henryo Member+

    Jun 26, 2007
    IMHO, more keen to look at the Top-10 only Standings, being more relevant once the Playoffs Fields were set, as these will form the potential match-ups in playoffs, while the eliminated teams would no longer matter, :-i
     

Share This Page