Team Sponsor badges

Discussion in 'MLS: General' started by ax319, Aug 1, 2002.

  1. ax319

    ax319 New Member

    Jul 7, 2002
    I was thinking since most MLS teams dont have sponsors on there kits anymore that they should allow team to have team or local sponsors on the kits as long as they dont conflict with MLS sponsors.
  2. jmeissen0

    jmeissen0 New Member

    Mar 31, 2001
    page 1078
    i thought there was one or two teams that did not have sponsor badges

    i know the metros don't

    who else?
  3. ThreeApples

    ThreeApples Member+

    Jul 28, 1999
    Smurf Village
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    DC and Columbus, I think.

    The shirt sponsorships are reserved for the league's highest-paying sponsors. They would not be happy if they find out that a local sponsor who paid far less money got onto a shirt. The empty shirts are something to offer to potential new major national sponsors.
  4. ax319

    ax319 New Member

    Jul 7, 2002
    the crew have pepsi right on, the rapids had pepsi for a few years but dont have a sponsor this year and as you mentiond DC and the metrostars dont have one either, maybe with ADT signing on they can take one of those teams.
  5. jmeissen0

    jmeissen0 New Member

    Mar 31, 2001
    page 1078
    i thought KC was the ussf?

    adt is not an official sponsor, just a corporate sponsor, so they will not be going on someone's back
  6. mlsfan31

    mlsfan31 Member

    Nov 1, 1999
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    LA- Bud
    Crew- Pepsi
    NE- Pepsi
    Chicago- Honda
    KC- USSF
    SJ- Yahoo
    Dallas- Tony the Tiger (I think).

    Most of the teams do have sponsors.
  7. HalaMadrid

    HalaMadrid Member

    Apr 9, 1999
    That would be the Soccer FOUNDATION, not the Fed. There's a difference.

Share This Page