if they go there could be trouble. And if they stay there could be double. It's everybody's favorite game, advising players on what they should do next in their careers. So you got to let them know: should they stay or should they go (or in-between)? Parks - stay, it's early and fits that style Weah - loan, didn't look to be at PSG's level (at least yet) Novakovich - go, Championship is stubborn about integrating from leagues well below Hyndman - go, Bournemouth haven't kept promises and have slow-played him Pulisic - stay, unless Liverpool comes a calling, otherwise go Wood - go, floundered last year but B2 is probably below level, think they confirmed he'll move Miazga - loan, away from both Chelsea and Vitesse, proved too much for latter not enough former Green - loan, away from Stuttgart and Furth, not good enough for former but too offensive for latter Moore - stay, he's come this far and should give it another year, they don't seem to hate him Robinson - stay (@everton) showed potential w/ both Bolton + U.S. EPB - stay (@Kortrijk), was integrated, but briefly. Unless gets d-mid chance somewhere decent Olosunde - loan, stagnating on a youth team, may have potential to play w/ the big club LDLT - stay, they got promoted to the EPL, it's kind of exciting and has upside Wright - loan, to another club, didn't really work out but still has major potential
My only disagreements: Nova should say at Reading. He's not from another league; he's a home grown product. That will bring institutional pressure to give him opportunity. Otherwise, the critics will ask: why even have a youth program? LDLT is not near EPL quality. His failure to get on the field in the Championship is all the evidence I have--or need--to make this conclusion. So he must leave Fulham, either on a loan or a transfer.