No. A couple of cases, and now we might be talking. Or we can just send him to Mexico. Or Chicago. Eh ... same thing. Get them darn tootin' cowpoke hicks out of these heah forums!
stratifies...ok, I will take your word for it. Interesting enough, when the pace is looked at in more detail it shows that the Revs are a better road team, even outside of the strength of schedule. For the road games only: -------Record---Pace---Pace per Game Revs - 4-1-2 --- +7 ---- +1 FCD - 5-2-3 --- +8 ---- +0.8 The road has helped the hoopla from 96 get a better pace then our best in league Revs. For imformational use only...the home where it imposible to get positive (thats just sad): -------Record---Pace---Pace per Game Revs - 5-0-2 --- -4 ---- -.57 FCD - 5-0-0 --- 0 ---- 0 This just goes to show, well not much. But, the Revs are still the better team.
Which, if you've been paying attention, is what I've been saying, using The Pace to prove my point. Thanks. And that is an interesting way to look at The Pace, breaking it out like that. Although why is it "just sad" to not be able to get positive points at home? Winning at home is what you're supposed to do, and as long as the graph is even for everyone, it is the numbers in relation to each other rather than whether a number is positive or negative that matter, right?
Examples: 2004 - in late September, the low team had -26 and the top team had -11. 2003 - top team -4, bottom team -31 (ouch!) 2002 - top -4, bottom -24 That is a pretty decent stretch for each year.
No Problem. I just figured you Dallas fans could use a little help in showing that the Revs are better then the current pace indicates, and Dallas is not as good
Well, when it comes to my rankings, I'm not as much of a fan and more of a journalist. As to the other folk - you tell em!