Official Champions League Final post-match discussion thread (R)

Discussion in 'Liverpool' started by liverpool1003, May 23, 2007.

  1. wemess0

    wemess0 Member

    Jun 25, 2003
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Also, let me add, and accuse me of sour grapes all you want, but I'm in agreement with everyone who said the three minutes of stoppage time were disgraceful.

    We had five second-half substitutions, two second-half goals, injury breaks for Inzaghi and Nesta, an additional substitution in stoppage time, and a fan running onto the field, and we didn't even get the the three minimum minutes? WTF?
     
  2. Liv'poolFaninAZ

    Liv'poolFaninAZ New Member

    Oct 24, 2004
    Glendale, Arizona
    Re: It hurts so much but they are still my heros!

    Our boys played like champs. We still lost, but they played like absolute champs! You just can't be too angry at that. We got beat plain and simple by a few chances we gave Milan just like they gave us in 05.

    We lost in the final, at least we made it to the final and once there, dominated. We just couldn't finish today. that's all.

    YNWA!
     
  3. ChanceTheDog

    ChanceTheDog New Member

    Apr 27, 2005
    lexington
    The really bad thing about the injury time thing, is the fact that Milan don't have the best record when it comes to cheating, and although i'm sure that wasn't the case tonight I can't help but have that bit of doubt at the back of my mind. Lets face it, he was a funny choice as a ref.

    Still it wasn't a case of that we were unlucky not to score more goals tonight, we just weren't good enough, and Milan took their chances.
     
  4. Caesar

    Caesar Moderator
    Staff Member

    Mar 3, 2004
    Oztraya
    It's not written into the Laws of the Game, but FIFA have been instructing referees to do it for years. You're in the US - dig out your USSF Advice to Referees, it's in there. You could probably find it in a FIFA Circular somewhere if you hunted around as well.
     
  5. Springbok FC

    Springbok FC New Member

    Apr 12, 2005
    Los Angeles
    Absolutely. Which makes it all the more agonizing that Kaka was able to create once Masch was subbed out.
     
  6. YNWAYNWA

    YNWAYNWA New Member

    Feb 26, 2005
    New York
    that's not sour grapes -- that's facts

    second half:
    6 substitutions
    3 yellow cards
    2 goals
    1 fan on the pitch
    1 medical emergency (Nesta)
    other time wasting

    not even playing the entire 3 additional announced minutes . . .

    if the Ref has his own agenda . . .

    that's life
     
  7. Twenty26Six

    Twenty26Six Feeling Sheepish...

    Jan 2, 2004
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I forgot about the fan on the pitch. The more I think about it, the more upset I am. 2:40, wtf.
     
  8. nachito455

    nachito455 New Member

    Sep 11, 2006
    Mexico
    im pretty sure that there is humor in that but do you disagree with anything on my post?
     
  9. Caesar

    Caesar Moderator
    Staff Member

    Mar 3, 2004
    Oztraya
    Come on... I thought the amount of stoppage time was a joke as well, but there's no reason to start suggesting stuff like that. Let's be classy.
     
  10. nachito455

    nachito455 New Member

    Sep 11, 2006
    Mexico
    yes mascherano was very good but i would like to say that kaka gave the game those small highlights you see, especially when he deeked and did thr maradona or what every you want to call it and when he was going to get by agger that was a hell of a move as well...not to mention the perfect through pass to inzaghi
     
  11. nachito455

    nachito455 New Member

    Sep 11, 2006
    Mexico
    while i complettly agree with the time bullshit thingy..hte fan didnt take up any time and wasnt even shown on camera and it was 2:48 when the clock stpooed so if your gonna argue about it argue with things that really matter like goal celebrations, substitutions, injuries, things like that....
     
  12. dragback

    dragback New Member

    Apr 11, 2007
    England
    I was being lazy, I agree 100%. I cant gine him credit for doing this on purpose.
    [​IMG]
     
  13. Suss

    Suss Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 11, 2003
    New York
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Or how about the fact that they said their would be a minimum of 3 minutes added on. And that was before the substitution.
     
  14. nachito455

    nachito455 New Member

    Sep 11, 2006
    Mexico
    i appreciate your comment, and the foto is superb, even thoyugh its hard to tell if there is sarcasm at all from your part, but that call is imposible to call it one way only and even through replayas and its still inconclusive...

    besides i think his arm in compltetly touching his chest which makes it even more of a hard call
     
  15. dragback

    dragback New Member

    Apr 11, 2007
    England
    on the injury time cock up, I'd like to see the time keeping kept out of the referee's control. Have someone off the pitch who cant get distracted by controlling the players. I like American sports and would like the clock to stop each time the ball goes dead. Problem is I guess it could take over 2 hours to get 90minutes played.
     
  16. nachito455

    nachito455 New Member

    Sep 11, 2006
    Mexico
    i agree the stoppage time was complete bullshit and only adds to the firepower and polemic talk...i personally had bet a 5 minutes of stoppage time but i guess the refs are to be blamed on that....i really dont think its milan buisness there..
     
  17. YNWAYNWA

    YNWAYNWA New Member

    Feb 26, 2005
    New York
    let me rephrase:
    second half:
    6 substitutions
    3 yellow cards
    2 goals
    1 fan on the pitch
    1 medical emergency (Nesta)
    other time wasting

    how much extra time should have been played?


    as for the Arm of God, having seen replays . . . clear goal, no intention -- these TV people often get a bit unfair with the benefit of slow motion replays
     
  18. EuroChamp05

    EuroChamp05 New Member

    Jul 16, 2005
    Chicago
    Did anyone else notice Rafa show his watch to Platini when he accepted his medal? I'll just say I think the first goal was a hand ball. It hit his arm and I'm biased regardless of how any rule may or may not interpret it. It hit his arm, that's what I saw.

    Pennant was outstanding in that first half and it would have been great to see Crouch have a chance to get on the end of one. Maybe put it away or just knock it down for Stevie or Dirk. Masch was possessed. His starting role is locked down in my opinion.
     
  19. KennyWoo

    KennyWoo Member

    May 21, 2007
    Pasadena, California
    Club:
    Los Angeles Galaxy
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I agree. Pennant was beating his man but his service wasn't all that great, he was never able to cut inside, and he often would try to beat his man repeatedly to avoid having to use his left foot (this resulted in a good opportunity to cross being turned into a giveaway on multiple occasions). He was okay, but not great.

    The match was pretty poor and I feel bad as Liverpool seemed to have the initiative throughout. A cruel game sometimes, football.
     
  20. dragback

    dragback New Member

    Apr 11, 2007
    England
    How do you mean?
     
  21. nachito455

    nachito455 New Member

    Sep 11, 2006
    Mexico
    the rafa thing was a bit wierd if nto completly stupid...

    Rafa: did you see that...we should have got 2 more minutes at least
    Platini: I just hand out the medals!
    Rafa: w/e!

    but i have a feeling it had nothing to do with the time ..if it did its even kind of rude and totally unprofesional and just down right random

    and pennant was outstanding yes...but really jankulovski sucked!!
     
  22. Twenty26Six

    Twenty26Six Feeling Sheepish...

    Jan 2, 2004
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Nachito55, what team do you support and why are you even in this thread arguing with people??
     
  23. nachito455

    nachito455 New Member

    Sep 11, 2006
    Mexico
    well if you dont mind me explaining, he means that refs dont get replays and so any play which is still uncertian on a replay definatly can not be blamed for a ref calling it one way or another
     
  24. liverbird

    liverbird BigSoccer Supporter

    Sep 29, 2000
    Mars
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    In 2005 they played better than us for most of the match, yet we won -- tonight we were clearly the better team, yet we lost -- that's football. I am proud of our team. YNWA. Now lets buy a feckin real striker.
     
  25. Caesar

    Caesar Moderator
    Staff Member

    Mar 3, 2004
    Oztraya
    Longer. They've done studies that show that the average amount of time that the ball is actually in play during a normal match can be as little as 45 minutes. Pretty astounding stuff. The reality is referees only really add time for extended stoppages (injuries, cautioning, substitutions, etc). If they stopped the clock every time the ball went dead, we'd be there for hours.

    That said, it seemed to me like this match merited more than 3mins added time for the half.
     

Share This Page