I want, I want, I want SHINY NEW TOYS! - LFC transfer thread

This is the last post i make on this, because apparently you have trouble with your comprehension skills, and i don't have the time to mentor you on the concept of logic.

Liverpool brought in Calvin Ramsey as a replacement for Connor Bradley because they didn't see Connor making the breakthrough. Ramsay was brought in to fill the void of a 2nd choice RB behind TAA who was undisputed 1st choice, and hence why Bradley was let go off on loan to Bolton. The situation being thAT Ramsay came with a set of issues that curtailed an entire season, seeing him sidelined, and hence why the club felt they could not pursue with Ramsay and so brought back bradley who even after the loan spell at Bolton, was NOT a shoe in for a place in the team. Klopp can say whatever he wants after the fact, and even then he CLEARLY STATES and i paraphrase, "we will see what will happen".

If you can't understand this, go back to the 3rd grade, and ask Mrs. Pennington to teach you some English bro, because you're having a hard time understanding a language that in all rights should be the first and is likely the only language you speak, making me seriously wonder what the fk you are on bro!

I'm done here!

 

Yes, hence why they brought someone in to replace him, and was heralded as a 2nd choice. Logic doesn't really seem to filter all too well with you unfortunately.

How did they mak you a moderator here Newterp, you're like a 6 year old child drunk off the censorship.

Do let me know when you are done with the Connor Bradley circle jerk, you'll have to excuse me for having better things to do.

 

Boys...

 

Both misspelled and misused?

 

You're talking to someone who speaks 8 languages, however imperfectly... you really want to go down this route Delaynomo?

Newterp apparently doesn't seem to understand the concept of causality. There is no point arguing with someone so unhinged, so as to not grasp the straws that link to a player exiting on a loan. But I'll leave that be, because I really don't have the time to be arguing with someone who has nothing better to do than sit around arguing with their own shadow. Life is too fleeting, to stay a permanent tennant in the nut house. So I concede... you are clearly a most logical and well hearsed knowledgeable scholar of all things Connor Bradley. I hope it brings you satiety...

 

So what’s it like to be absolutely wrong in 8 languages simultaneously?

At no stage have you quoted a single LFC person saying that the club was looking to get rid of Conor Bradley until they lucked into keeping him. You’ve tried some bullshit of quoting a Guardian article that doesn’t mention Bradley, quoting an article from The Athletic that entirely refutes your point, all the while claiming some ridiculous causality between the signing of Ramsay and the loan of Bradley. But at no stage ever have you produced any evidence of any LFC person or indeed any journalist or columnist supporting your bullshit.

You’d think if it were so obvious, so definitive that everyone would be pointing out how lucky LFC got, that their scouting and developmental departments were f.ucked up in this regard. Yet there isn’t a single article, a single quote from anyone ever to back up your assertions. Not in any language. But all we get from you is, “because I’m a world champion in long jumping to tenuous conclusions”, because Ramsay signed at the same time Bradley went on loan, therefore it must mean LFC were trying to get rid of Bradley. When signing multiple youth players in the same position and players going out on loan is very common and usually not related at all.

But no, you have insights, knowledge and understanding that no one else possesses, is not backed up by any external sources or evidence and this gift of unique vision allows you to see (in 8 languages!) crap that’s not there.

I said earlier that your rantings had done everyone here a favor as they exposed the levels of your utter, utter stupidity, so that going forward we’d know what to expect when you posted. Nothing you’ve posted since will disabuse anyone of this stupidity and disingenuousness of yours. Many thanks.

 

It's weird to see a one sided argument with someone I have blocked. No context for these barbs.

 

Yep , I doubt anyone on this board takes him seriously.

 

Indeed. Take a look at any youth/underage cup winning side (or losing finalists). It’s sad and chilling when there’s a “where-are-they-now?” article. Sometimes none of them have made the grade at anything above League 1, usually there’re 1 or 2 who you’ll have heard of independently of their underage exploits. (And then you have Jay Spearing. ).

 

Happy to have a one sided argument with you when you’re free.

 

Honestly, its like talking to a mental clinic inpatient, neither of whom happen to understand the basis for uncertainty. How fuking stupid can you get to not understand what I'm insinuating here.

Alina Habba... amusing.

As for the other muppet in here..The Athletic that entirely refutes your point, all the while claiming some ridiculous causality between the signing of Ramsay and the loan of Bradley.' Really??? You need me to break this down for you? Like really bro? The club just bought a player to usurp a 2nd placement behind their undisputed 1st choice, and sent an academy prospect out on loan under the auspices of having been eschewed from the team, as Ramsey was very highly sought after, but apparently that in no way signifies a demotion! Please don't make me laugh, with your muppetry.

The previous article I just posted saw Klopp himself say that he didn't now what the future installed was, for Connor Bradley post Bolton loan. Here is another, directly from Bradley himself where he is quoted as saying,

“In the summer I will go back to pre-season with Liverpool and I just have to see how that will go,” said Bradley.

“The future is dependant on that, but I am looking forward to getting back to Liverpool.”

Suggesting at a future that was very much up in the air at that time, and its concievable to say that had Ramsey not been injured and had a run out in the first team as 2nd choice, that Conor would never have been afforded the opportunity to deputise for TAA and so not be in the position he is in. A lot of a football career is dependant on the chance falling of the dice in respects a luck, its why players excell in certain teams, but then fall off a cliff in others, because the set up either compliments or detracts from their skill sets.

https://www.thisisanfield.com/2023/...g-liverpool-pre-season-loan-toughened-him-up/
https://thekoptimes.com/2024/01/30/...ramsay-secures-loan-move-to-bolton-wanderers/

That's now multiple articles corroborating my stance, and there were also interviews made by Klopp in conferences where he specifically alluded to the fact that Bradley had to toughen up, and have more physicallity to his game, which had been in question during his first stint in the first team, and likely was the reason behind him departing on loan to begin with, so entirely assanine to suggest thaT Bradley was in any way a shoe in for second fiddle at RB. In fact things were a lot more touch and go, but when you're a fan boi, all sensibilities seem to fall out the window, on an unhinged percept of how the player you support was a shoe in.

When you're a fan boi, you're more interested in being seen to have supported a player, AFTER the fact, because, well, you really have nothing else going for you in life other than to sit around a forum cheerleading with your pom poms like a little clown. If I wanted a clown show I would just go visit the circus, as neither of you have any substance or thread of logic to any of your discourses. But hey, do let me know when you want to hop off Connor Bradley's dik and step back to reality. the bandwaggoning, is a little revolting if I'm being honest : ) but, I suppose expecting more from the likes here would be asking too much to begin with.

There really is no rational discourse here, all it is is muppet and muppetter trying to run the news flow with a polemic campaign, twisting the narrative to suite a conjured postulate because they really have nothing better to do. Ask yourself why its so important to you, to insist that Ramsey was not a replacement for Bradley after he was bought froM Aberdeen or whereever, to displace him as 2nd choice... the wording speaks for itself. But just imagine how fking stupid it is that this what you spend your days arguing about, a player that doesn't even know you exist, or could care less either way at your insignificance, and you so feeling the need to megaphone a constitution of accomplishment that you will never have it in you to accomplish of your own accord. HOW... FUKING... SAD... Just imagine a life lived on a forum board championing that of an other, where yours is all but lack. I kind of just feel sorry for you guys if I am being honest here. But such as the struggles of the masses.

 

newt?

Could be.

 

I unblocked him to see what was going on. It was interesting for 3 or 4 posts. My advice is to steer clear. Life is WAY too short.

 

Bear in mind that Dumb is obviously one of the 8 languages he speaks.

 

Yeah, I live in absolute mortal fear that he might, one day, out-cleverer me.

 

Cheese guy?

 

??
Benneth I meant.