Group 8 Libertad 3 - 1 LDU Quito Fluminense: 3-1-0 (10/1, +9) 10 LDU Quito: 3-1-1 (10/4, +6) 10 Libertad: 1-0-4 (4/8, -4) 3 Arsenal: 1-0-3 (2/13, -11) 3
Libertad played with a B team (as well as Liga) and this was the best I seen them play all tournament, maybe they should have used the B team all tournament lol
Group 8 Arsenal 2 - 0 Fluminense Fluminense: 3-1-1 (10/3, +7) 10 LDU Quito: 3-1-1 (10/4, +6) 10 Arsenal: 2-0-3 (4/13, -9) 6 Libertad: 1-0-4 (4/8, -4) 3
Interesting the 2 that are already qualified just lost with the 2 that are eliminated this group is full of surprises even after it's done. Flamengo is up 1-0 in Cusco.
2x0. This is Flamengo. Call us "llorones" and this is what happens. Talk trash all week and this is what happens.
3x0. Game. Set. Match. Potosi was a lot harder to play in, not to mention the fact it was raining and below 0 celsius made it even more difficult.
Group 6 Chivas Guadalajara 3 - 2 Santos FC Cúcuta Deportivo: 3-2-0 (6/2, +4) 11 Santos FC: 2-1-2 (11/5, +6) 7 Chivas Guadalajara: 2-0-3 (5/5, 0) 6 San José: 1-1-3 (4/14, -10) 4
Group 4 Cienciano 0 - 3 Flamengo Flamengo: 3-1-1 (7/4, +3) 10 Nacional: 3-0-2 (6/4, +2) 9 Cienciano: 2-1-2 (4/6, -2) 7 Coronel Bolognesi: 0-2-3 (0/3, -3) 2
Videos Chivas 3x2 Santos http://video.globo.com/Videos/Playe...+X+SANTOS+PELA+RODADA+DA+LIBERTADORES,00.html Cienciano 0x3 Flamengo http://video.globo.com/Videos/Playe...+FLAMENGO+PELA+RODADA+DA+LIBERTADORES,00.html
Yes, it was ! If it wasn't by the altitude, it would have been 6x0 ... Boca lost last year to Cienciano 3x0 ... their team is so horrible that I can't find another reason besides altitude.
Group 3 Colo Colo 2 - 0 UA Maricaibo Atlas: 3-1-1 (10/5, +5) 10 Colo Colo: 3-0-2 (10/8, +2) 9 Boca Juniors: 2-1-2 (9/9, 0) 7 UA Maracaibo: 0-2-3 (3/10, -7) 2
There's a Brazilian site that allows you to play out the group stage with the result that already took place plus your prediction for the remaining games. This is what I got: #1 Fluminense vs. #16 Lanus #2 Flamengo vs. #15 Sportivo Luqueño #3 River Plate vs. #14 América #4 Colo Colo vs. #13 San Lorenzo #5 São Paulo vs. #12 Boca Juniors (went through on Goals scored. Had the same differencial as Atlas) #6 Cruzeiro vs. #11 LDU #7 Estudiantes vs. #10 Santos #8 Cucuta vs. #9 Nacional If anyone is interested, here is the link. If you need any help with it, just let me know. There is one bug with it that you can easily solve by looking at another category. The first tiebreaker they use is the number of wins (tiebreaker for Brazilian league), but in the CL it is goal difference. For example, Danubio went through instead of Lanus on mine because they had more wins, but Lanus had a better goal differential, so I put them in Danubio's spot.
1) Sao paolo v 16) Nacional (COL) 2) Fluminense v 15) Lanus 3) Nacional (URU) v. 14) America 4) Cruzeiro v. 13) San Lorenzo 5) Atlas v 12) Boca Juniors 6) Estudiantes v. 11) LDUQ 7) Cucuta v. 10) Santos 8) River Plate v. 9) Flamengo Wow, that sucks. 4 repeats of group stages, which would be obvious. I then got 1) Sao Paolo v. 9) Flamengo 2) Fluminense v. 7) Cucuta 3) Nacional (URU) v 6) Estudiantes 4) Cruzeiro v 12) Boca Juniors then I have Sao Paolo, Fluminense, Estudiantes and Boca advancing, but the predictor doesn't change it so that the two Brasilians and two Argentinians play each other in the semis
Group 7 Audax Italiano 1 - 0 São Paulo São Paulo: 2-2-1 (5/4, +1) 8 Audax Italiano: 2-1-2 (5/5, 0) 7 Atlético Nacional: 1-2-1 (5/3, +2) 5 Sportivo Luqueño: 1-1-2 (3/6, -3) 4
Group 7 Sportivo Luqueño 1 - 3 Atlético Nacional Atlético Nacional: 2-2-1 (8/4, +4) 8 São Paulo: 2-2-1 (5/4, +1) 8 Audax Italiano: 2-1-2 (5/5, 0) 7 Sportivo Luqueño: 1-1-3 (4/9, -5) 4