Interesting article from the 'Foreign Policy' site: http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/03/16...-rousseff-downfall-brazil-protests-petrobras/
Idk if this is political but it's at least a social question. So my friend from niteroi was telling me she has been hearing gun shots from their apartment which is rare in regards to where she lives. Anyways there is a new favela being "built" on a huge rock and they assume this is the source. Here are some of my questions what's the etiquette for claiming a spot in a favela? Could I just hypothetically role up in there and just start building like some people say you can? How do people in favelas without water supply take showers and cook? Once a favela reaches a certain size is that when rio/municipalities start paving roads and working on sanitation? What do people build these houses out of? Who starts a favela a drug dealer or does it just start organically? How does a place with an extremly competitive real estate market allow a new favela to just "Pop" up? Do low middle class people just ever say fuk it with the cost of living and set up shop in a favela ? I assume a lot of people starting this favela are displaced from other areas in rio but this is fascinating me.
Also were the favelas any different during the military dictatorship in terms of crime rate and violence?
From what I know about the subject, you pretty much roll up, pick a spot and build. Most of them started stealin electricity and water but I think that after the military takeovers, some favelas were given proper assistance by the government and they have to pay bills now. They build houses with what they can find. I've seen documentaries where they just buy cement and start building with no outside help like construction workers. I don't think the government gives them much help with paving roads and stuff though. I know some gringos who work with NGOs in favelas in SP and Rio. Most of the favelas dwellers came from the nordeste for work and since the cost of living was too expensive in the city, they just built on the exterior of town. They then have kids who continue on and build there own homes there. I think the difference between Rio and Sao Paulo is that Sao Paulo favelas are almost all on the exterior of the city while Rio is cluttered with them all over. My cousin's girlfriend was just telling me about the number of favela dwellers rising in her home town(Bento Gonçalves).
URGENTE: Eduardo Cunha informa que autorizou processo de impeachment de Dilma https://t.co/TuThR6ItIL pic.twitter.com/anCf4QJuwJ— g1 (@g1) December 2, 2015
In English: Brazil’s President Dilma Rousseff will face impeachment proceedings in Congress https://t.co/IYllflxHcQ pic.twitter.com/rdzwj4yzFT— Bloomberg (@business) December 2, 2015
My whole take on this is pretty simple. If they (Her and Lula) knew all that shit was going down, they deserve to have charges brought up against them also. If they didn't know their own party was stealing billions and driving the whole countries economy into the ground, she deserves to be impeached on the grounds of complete and utter incompetance and gross negligence. In reality 99.99999% positive Lula robbed Brasil blind and squandered Brasils chances to be a true economic power for years. With Dilma, it's 90% chance she robbed the country blind also, and 10% chance she is a blind puppet used by Lula, and is simpleton like she shows each time she opens her mouth without a script already written for her. It's absolutely disgusting what PT did to Brasil. Sickening. And yet most people could give a ******** and continue to support them. Of course PSDB and the other parties are no saints, but a FHC type government would never have sank the boat. At least they had a limit to what they took.
Who are the alternatives to support? I've done my reading on Cunha and Aecio and they are pretty disgraceful people. Yea I wanted people to support Aecio but it was only due to the fact foreign investors/bankers would favor him. It was clear to us Dilma was bad for the economy but if Aecio was elected I see Brazil having similar issues. Why would a poor person in Recife or Rio vote for Aecio? Just because "on paper" the economy would be better doesn't mean any improvement would translate for an average brazilians life. . The same people regardless are skimming money off the top, like we mentioned before it's a nightmare supporting a family there. I mostly agree with you though. Maybe Brazilians will wake up once the unemployment benefits run out but i'm not seeing how you fix their issues without a RADICAL change. Also democracy really isn't valued in brazil. As someone who is a pragmatist it's hard for me to see a democratic solution.
I can't stand Dilma so in no way am I defending her. We can all say we predicted this but I take no joy in how people are going to start suffering.
I think it's a cool idea for a party and I doubt they would try to install a dictatorship, and since they aren't left-wing, we can be sure they would do a better job than PT and PSDB. Unfortunately no chance they ever grow much as propaganda here hates the military. This party is cool too (if you sympathize with the monarchy, at least): http://www.real.org.br/
There is no simple answer. Politics has turned into a club or machine in Brasil in that its impossible to rise in the system without being dirty. The others won't trust you unless you're in on the dirt with them. I have no easy answers. the political corruption in Brasil is so engrained it will take decades of radical change to make any progress. What doesn't help is the size and diversity of Brasil. It is hard enough to change this shit in SP and Rio, but possible. What gets impossible to change decades of empty and false socialism in the neglected parts. This false socialism of making the population dependent on handouts and keeping them uneducated is the worst form of government there is for a nation and is not easy to fix.
The differences are deeper than just economic policy. Did you know for example that Dilma is trying to phase out European history from school curriculum? The proposal they unveiled for 2016 focused on Brazilan and African history, as well as Cuban and Mexican revolutions. While Renaissance and the age of discovery would get cliffnote mentions. " No currículo de História, a principal falha do texto elaborado por uma comissão de professores universitários, de acordo com estudiosos, é a ausência ou a pouca ênfase na História europeia, que inclui temas importantes como o estudo da Grécia e da Roma antiga, além das Revoluções Francesa e Industrial, contrapondo-se a um vasto conteúdo de História do Brasil e da África, assinalando a importância de determinados povos, como indígenas e escravos. HISTORIADORES VEEM VIÉS IDEOLÓGICO A configuração do conteúdo levou historiadores a apontarem um suposto viés ideológico de esquerda na Base Curricular. Hoje, a presidente da Associação Nacional dos Professores e Pesquisadores de História (Anpuh), Maria Helena Capelato, se reunirá com o MEC para pedir prazo maior para a consulta pública, que termina em 15 de março. — Em alguns pontos, a proposta aparece muito detalhada, nas revoluções Cubana ou Mexicana, por exemplo. Em outros, como o Renascimento ou as Navegações, as menções são raras e vagas. É ótimo fazermos a crítica do eurocentrismo, mas não se pode deixar de fora aqueles que estão sendo criticados. Da mesma forma, concordamos com a inclusão de povos que são relegados no ensino, como os índios, os Incas — afirma Maria Capelato. " http://www.dm.com.br/cotidiano/2016/01/mec-ja-admite-mudar-texto-do-novo-curriculo-da-educacao.html PT is totally onboard with Eurocide.
PMDB likely breaking away from Dilma and Co tomorrow. Its been nice Dilminha. Don't let the door hit you on the way out
Looking pretty good so far, but I say, may we never be content. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance as the saying goes.
New Dilma interview. This woman was actually voted president not once but twice of the largest country in South America and (former thanks to her)6th largest economy of the world. Incredible really but then you remember a self-proclaimed illiterate was her predecessor also having been voted in twice by the majority . http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/poder/...r-o-pato-do-pato-diz-dilma-sobre-cortes.shtml
Yes, Lula and Dilma are disgraceful. Hopefully neither of them nor their political party (PT) will ever rule again. Temer may not be perfect (far from it) but so far he has been looking far more a proper president than Lula & Dilma ever were.
Jair Messias Bolsonaro. 28 de Outubro de 2018 – 38o. Presidente da República Federativa do Brasil. Assino embaixo.