Baptista: Arsenal warn of "special international transfer tribunal"

Discussion in 'Arsenal' started by Teso Dos Bichos, Jul 5, 2005.

  1. Teso Dos Bichos

    Teso Dos Bichos Red Card

    Sep 2, 2004
    Purged by RvN
    "Seville have rejected a £8 million bid from Arsenal for striker Julio Baptista....

    It's been suggested Arsenal have warned Seville that they are prepared to take the matter to a special international transfer tribunal if they continue to resist their offers.

    Meanwhile..."

    http://www.tribalfootball.com/july/spanishnews2050705.html


    Forget about the dodgy source and the use of the word "suggested" for a minute. Just what the hell is a "special international transfer tribunal" and how can that be called on because a club rejects an offer for a player? It's probably just some random Aussie shite, but I was wondered if anyone had any ideas? :confused:
     
  2. antifan

    antifan Member+

    Aug 14, 2004
    The Scottie
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    It has been suggested that the Special International Transfer Tribunal, or SpITT for short, is an adjunct to the G-14. When teams outside the G-14 refuse reasonable offers from member clubs, the offending club can be called before a special tribunal made up of a group of elite agents. Pini Zahavi heads the tribunal, and he has the ultimate power to sanction teams for not "playing the game." Sanctions include increased agent fees and under the table payments on future sales, along with the spectre of constantly unsettled players and frequent tabloid stories. This tribunal has never actually been called to order as the selling clubs have always folded under the massive financial pressure. I'll bet that Seville does the same, they know that they really have no choice.
     
  3. Its only Ray Parlour

    Aug 3, 2003
    London
    Or......

    It could just be a new contract ruling which states that players over the age of 23 who have fulfilled 3 years of their current contract can leave the club freely with a special tribunal setting the transfer fee between the two clubs.
     
  4. Arsenal_pwns_all

    Arsenal_pwns_all New Member

    Aug 13, 2004
    Is this thing for real? Cause if it is, it's the most evil thing I have ever heard of in football. Makes me feel that anyone is going to hell if he does call up that SPITT thing. (Then again, which manager isn't going to hell?)

    Edit: Never mind, I have little doubt that you are pulling our legs. Nothing from that dodgy source could be true.
     
  5. fedwood

    fedwood Member

    Sep 13, 2004
    So we could for example say we want John Terry and say we offered something reasonable and take Chelsea to this so called court.
     
  6. Arsenal_pwns_all

    Arsenal_pwns_all New Member

    Aug 13, 2004
    LOL :D I doubt the court would be a match to the power of the Russian Mafia.
     
  7. antifan

    antifan Member+

    Aug 14, 2004
    The Scottie
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Just to clarify, i get my information from the same source as tribal football. ;)
     
  8. jwaldman11

    jwaldman11 New Member

    Jun 14, 2002
    The OC
    Don't they meet in the middle of a swamp, where the "Legion of Doom" used to be headquartered?
     
  9. Martin Daoust

    Martin Daoust New Member

    Feb 14, 2003
    Hartford, CT
    The fact that this is headed by Pini Zahavi would be reason enough to avoid it like the plague...

    Seriously we all know what Arsenal and Gooners think of Zahavi and the like and the current climate and if we were to go this route we all need to shut up and stop complaining no matter how legitimate the complaints about the conduct of other clubs/agents/players on the transfer market.
    Even if it is part of the Bosman ruling and little more than an arbitration board for transfer fees we should stay away from it at all costs. I might change my mind if we were discussing Ronaldinho or Trezeguet or Kaka or Gerrard but as promising as Baptista is, it would be very reckless to put ourselves in Zahavi's hands as the next time he gets his hooks in one of our lads we would be hypocrites to protest...
     
  10. Teso Dos Bichos

    Teso Dos Bichos Red Card

    Sep 2, 2004
    Purged by RvN
    Forgot about that. :eek:


    Article 17 Consequences of Terminating a Contract Without Just Cause

    The following provisions apply if a contract is terminated without just
    cause:

    1. In all cases, the party in breach shall pay compensation. Subject to the
    provisions of Art. 20 and annex 4 in relation to Training Compensation,
    and unless otherwise provided for in the contract, compensation
    for breach shall be calculated with due consideration for the law of
    the country concerned, the specificity of sport, and any other objective
    criteria. These criteria shall include, in particular, the remuneration and
    other benefits due to the player under the existing contract and/or
    the new contract, the time remaining on the existing contract up to a
    maximum of five years, the fees and expenses paid or incurred by the
    Former Club (amortised over the term of the contract) and whether
    the contractual breach falls within a Protected Period.

    2. Entitlement to compensation cannot be assigned to a third party. If
    a Professional is required to pay compensation, the Professional and
    his New Club shall be jointly and severally liable for its payment. The
    amount may be stipulated in the contract or agreed between the parties.

    3. In addition to the obligation to pay compensation, sporting sanctions
    shall also be imposed on any player found to be in breach of contract
    during the Protected Period. This sanction shall be a restriction of
    four months on his eligibility to play in Official Matches. In the case
    of aggravating circumstances, the restriction shall last six months. In
    all cases, these sporting sanctions shall take effect from the start of
    the following Season of the New Club. Unilateral breach without just
    cause or sporting just cause after the Protected Period will not result
    in sporting sanctions. Disciplinary measures may, however, be imposed
    outside of the Protected Period for failure to give due notice of termination
    (i.e. within fifteen days following the last match of the Season).
    The Protected Period starts again when, while renewing the contract,
    the duration of the previous contract is extended.

    4. In addition to the obligation to pay compensation, sporting sanctions
    shall be imposed on any club found to be in breach of contract or
    found to be inducing a breach of contract during the Protected Period.
    It shall be presumed, unless established to the contrary, that any club
    signing a Professional who has terminated his contract without just
    cause has induced that Professional to commit a breach. The club
    shall be banned from registering any new players, either nationally or
    internationally, for two Registration Periods.

    5. Any person subject to the FIFA Statutes and FIFA regulations (club
    officials, players’ agents, players etc.) who acts in a manner designed
    to induce a breach of contract between a Professional and a club in
    order to facilitate the transfer of the player shall be sanctioned.


    I prefer antifan's though. :D
     
  11. Rick B

    Rick B Member

    Aug 26, 2003
    Harare, Zimbabwe
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Zimbabwe

    You really should stop reading from your toilet paper you know.... ;)
     
  12. jwaldman11

    jwaldman11 New Member

    Jun 14, 2002
    The OC
    Ummm...Martin? Re-read the post. It was all a joke from anti, though a damn fine one and rep-worthy, but they won't let me rep him.
     
  13. Martin Daoust

    Martin Daoust New Member

    Feb 14, 2003
    Hartford, CT
    Figured it was in part but reading the follow-up post to his I wasn't sure. Agree it was good, though, and wanted to rep you for the "Legion of Doom" refererence, too. But PLEASE let there be NO "Wonder Twins" references unless the twins in question are Lynda Carter's

    *growls hungily like Homer Simpson*
     
  14. yossarian

    yossarian Moderator
    Staff Member

    Jun 16, 1999
    Big City Blinking
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Activate........

    [​IMG]
     
  15. jwaldman11

    jwaldman11 New Member

    Jun 14, 2002
    The OC
    Lynda Carter? Man, that's old school. I prefer to think of the now-single Shannon Elizabeth's Wonder Twins from American Pie.
     
  16. Martin Daoust

    Martin Daoust New Member

    Feb 14, 2003
    Hartford, CT
    Forget old school/new school(hey that'd make a good segment on "SportsCenter" - I gotta call ESPN...) Tell me if Bardot wasn't La Bardot of "And God Created Woman" (well, without the craziness and fascist political views) you'd diss her. Or if you were presented with Sophia Loren from when she made "Boy On A Dolphin" you'd say no. Right.
    As for today there is only one word in women...MILIAN. DAMN DAMN DAMN...as for Nick Cannon Dave Chapelle said it best - "************ Nick Cannon!"
    Get your hands of my future trophy wife now dammit!
     
  17. GoonerMan

    GoonerMan New Member

    Jul 21, 2004
    Essex,England
    I Dont Care How We Sign Him, As Long As We Do! It Seems A Bit Out Of Order Tho That A Club Is Forced To Sell A Player Just Because A Team Are Making A Good Offer.
     
  18. GoonerMan

    GoonerMan New Member

    Jul 21, 2004
    Essex,England
    oop sorry didnt relise i was in caps
     
  19. surfcam

    surfcam Member

    Sep 8, 2004
    Corpus Christi, TX
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    As I understand it, Team A does not want to sell the player and have refused all 'reasonable' offers from Team B. The player for Team A wants to go to Team B, which would terminate his contract. Since Team A won't let the player out of his contract even though appropriate compensation has been offered, the matter goes to the tribunal. The key I believe is that the player wants to go and needs to get out of his contract. This ruling I expect was prepared so that a player is not forced to stay at any club if the club doesn't want to let them go. Team A isn't being forced to sell a player ONLY because their is a good offer on the table.
     
  20. GoonerMan

    GoonerMan New Member

    Jul 21, 2004
    Essex,England
    ok mate i see it a little bit clearer now
     
  21. TxTechGooner

    TxTechGooner we're having fun here, no?

    Feb 24, 2003
    in this day n age.. how can anyone determine what is a "fair" offer?
    that seems so subjective, imo.
     
  22. surfcam

    surfcam Member

    Sep 8, 2004
    Corpus Christi, TX
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I think they have to meet the existing terms of the contract, any fees or other payments resulting in the move, and then some fair price, which as you said, can be subjective given the recent transfer amounts paid recently. They may look at the statistics of other players in similar moves and of similar status (though this can be subjective as well). Most likely it is a fancy bargaining table.
     
  23. TheSlipperyOne

    TheSlipperyOne Member+

    Feb 29, 2000
    Denver
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    In a big metal skull building.
     

Share This Page