When Random Jibberish is riding in a time machine way far into the future...

So I’m sitting here in Moss Landing trying Phil’s Fish Market for the first time and I have to say, that’s some damn good chowder!

 

BREAKING: An arrest warrant has been issued for former LSU star Odell Beckham Jr., who was videoed hitting a police officer on the back side after the Tigers' win over Clesmon. https://t.co/SpQLuKk9QC

— SaintsNOW (@SaintsNOW) January 16, 2020

 

Looking forward to a GRATE game on Sunday! GO NINERS!

 

http://blogs.mercurynews.com/purdy/2015/10/03/super-bowl-50-countdown-19-weeks-to-go-time-to-talk-optics-and-all-those-golden-gate-bridge-beauty-shot-television-cutaways-why-not-some-from-the-south-bay/

 

If they showed that on TV (snow in California), somebody might get the crazy idea global warming is a hoax.

 

Weather ≠ Climate, and peer reviewed research, not courthouse BS determines what is good science.

 

I don't know, but I think for as long as the earth has been around the climate seems to always be changing.

 

Peer review is worthless in the face of GroupThink. Was Eugenics peer reviewed in its day? I believe it was. How did that turn out?

Good science is determined by its predictive capability. If we put a plane in the air we can land it safely. If we give a person anesthesia, we can operate without the patient feeling pain. That's science.

Sham science, like Global Warming, leads to observably false predictions like, "The End of Snow," trumpeted in the New York Times six years ago. Did the scientific community disclaim that nonsense in the paper of record? I believe not. Unlike peer review, however, the hills beyond Levi's Stadium have provided a strong rebuke to the delusion propagated in the mass media.

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/08/opinion/sunday/the-end-of-snow.html

 

. . . Eugenics was the science of the day, but it was based on poor research and largely based on value judgments put forth as scientific facts. Eugenics was a conduit for prejudices and an opportunity for social engineering . . .

. . . Hitler took his cue from American eugenics. Fortunately, his excesses brought the folly and inhumanity of this “scientific” endeavor to light . . .

https://www.jpands.org/vol19no4/singleton.pdf

 

Forget about all of the worlds scientists for a minute, Jeff Bezos thinks you’re being unreasonable...

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/15/jef...s-climate-change-is-not-being-reasonable.html

 

Bezos has been pressured by climate-change-activist-employees in his own company for months. Maybe he's simply pacifying the hysterical mob (after threatening them).

Amazon told its employees they could be fired after they tried to publicly pressure the online retail giant to more urgently address climate change . . .

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/amaz...cKpzpX5Uu-AG_sWxY3DNrybXaa-q9s1TG8KEx0_KRdj_3

Workers were told they violated company policy when they criticized the retail giant in The Washington Post.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/amazon-warns-employees-climate-change_n_5e0e42bbc5b6b5a713b769a0

 

GREEN BAY PACKERS at SAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINERS. (December 5, 1954)

49ers won this game (35-0)

Coach: Buck Shaw

 

This is the Niners 7th Super Bowl in 38 years! That is pretty good and it means they've appeared on average ever 5.4 years. I don't think too many teams in the NFL other than maybe the Patriots and maybe the Steelers can claim this record.

 

On the flip side, the Niners have appeared in 16 NFC title games in the Super Bowl era (a full extra season worth) and, even with yesterday's win, accumulated a sub-.500 record of 7 wins and 9 losses in those games.

 

Wrong I am.

 

Dallas and Denver also have seven appearances or more if you include the 1970s.

 

Since the league merger in 1970, the Niners have appeared in 16 NFC Championship games and on average, that is one appearance every 3.1 years. That is a pretty good record too. ​