Trump's Presidency IV: Stupefaction Jackson

I think it's fair to call it a preponderance of circumstantial evidence, and we remain without hard evidence.

Be that as it may, I believe Trump has more to worry about with the obstruction probe, which personally targets him.

Even if Mueller found that his campaign coordinated with Russia, Trump could plausibly claim he had no idea those individuals were working with Russians to target voters.

If Mueller concludes he has enough evidence to indict Pres Trump (he can't because DOJ won't ever indict a sitting president), then Congress has a go/no go decision to make with regards to impeachment

 

Literally nothing. He's better off taking a page from Obama's playbook and not giving these accusations the time of day, and move on with his agenda.

Mueller is going to investigate, and nothing he can say or do will change that, so why bother even responding? Just issue a release saying the white house has no comment on an ongoing investigation and go tall to Mueller if you want more info

 

Better listen to him, FlSounder. He's pre-law.

 

Hey, you could call anything something else, so sure.

 

Oh. I'm sorry. I didn't say what you claim I said, so I'm guilty for not saying what I should have said.

Can you not see how you've moved the goal posts?

Why am I not surprised?

 

He's bucking for promotion?

Or maybe he's looking to drop a dime before there's no quarter given...

 

His very first movie, wasn't it? He played Chip Diller, the "Thank you sir may I have another" guy...

 

Maybe he's not allowed to interact directly with female judges or prosecutors?

 

He's the prick that gets pranked on...

 

Dems forced it through in the first place. They can suck on it now that its in a death spiral. Buh Bye!

 

They didn't force it through, they voted in the law of the land after a year of hearings. You're confusing it with what the Republicans are doing now - a secret hearing to make sure you don't know how your healthcare is being hurt. (Lifetime caps are back! Whoooo!)

 

Looks like the GOP is ready to forcefeed us the AHCA, without us being allowed to read it. You gonna be OK with that?

 

This is why @nicephoras says you are troll and I am incline to agree. Because whatever school you graduated from should be sued for fraud.

Obama was responding to an attack by Trump so he was not the attacker and it is not a false accusations to not have seen an event 3 years into the future occurring. That is basic elementary school stuff. I am taking a break from arguing with this bot because if you are a real person, you must be thicker than pig shit.

 

Sending it to the committee tomorrow, defense to be scheduled within two weeks.

 

No goal posts moved. You want comity and collegiality now. You did not ask for it a year ago. Simple as that.

 

What sort of stand did you take on "What do we want? Dead cops now!"

How about "Hands up...don't shoot!"?

 

Love the mic drop at the end too. Watching Donald Trump dismantle his legacy piece by piece must be agony.

Are we arguing? Only one person here constantly throws out insults and seems like a genuinely angry person. You really need to relax and not get so upset....seriously. It's cool...lets just agree to disagree and not address each other anymore.

 

I would prefer them not to do it that way, no.

 

If you believe someone is innocent, you need something concrete to change your mind. I honestly believe, and would bet a lot of money that Trump was not colluding with the Russians to hack the DNC to influence the election. What happened after the election, I really don't know but before the election, what this is really all about.....Trump supporters are going to need something more then "conversations with Russian officials and oligarchs". I get your "smoking gun" argument, but in reality nothing that has been revealed would come close to changing our minds.