Just wondering what you think about this. NBC had the Trump/Billy Bush hot mic exchange on the bus for years. They happened to wait until 3 weeks before the election to release the footage. You think that is fair for a so-called "unbiased" media outlet to do that 3 weeks before the election? Why do you think they waited until then to release that tape? Where are all of the Trump sexual assault accusers that came out before the election? Where did they go after the election? I haven't heard a peep from one of them since 11/8/16. Why did they all just disappear?
You are comparing the actions of Billy Bush and NBC to Director Comey and the FBI? There may be your problem.
http://nypost.com/2017/01/21/woman-accusing-trump-of-sexual-assault-refuse-to-back-down/ Bmore has me on ignore. Somebody copy this link and send it to him.
http://nypost.com/2017/01/21/woman-accusing-trump-of-sexual-assault-refuse-to-back-down/ You may need to read more outlets other than Infowars and The Blaze.
Since you're kinda a stickler for being exact....got a link for this? Everything I have read stated that he decided not to allow it to be disclosed, not that he decided that there was no need for further investigation.
You did, intentional or not. You quoted a post on FBI and Comey's timing and used that as a platform to ask your question. You said you hand't heard a peep, I'm saying you are probably exposed mostly to media outlets that agree with you.
.@RepMikeQuigley on Russia: "If the US public saw what I had seen...they would want a full-throttle investigation" 6:28 AM - 24 Apr 2017 http://m.dailykos.com/stories/2017/...75acc023c1ebceefd588a6a7b66ae621&source=email
Maybe this has been posted before, but read the thread, it is very interesting: Oh. My. God. This is catastrophically wrong. https://t.co/nK2Uz41Lj1— Peter A. Shulman 📚 (@pashulman) April 25, 2017
Speaking for the non-Trumpanzee, fact-enjoying public...we've already seen enough evidence of TrumpCo collusion. There needs to be an independent prosecutor.
Allegedly! But then....lots of strange things occurred in 1990. Heck...Liverpool won the league that year!
Allow me to paraphrase a multitude of dickheadish posts about words having meanings. If we can't agree on that, then there is no point to a discussion. Show me, in the article you provided, where it states that the Obama administration decided there was no need for further investigation. I humbly await your response.
It does remind me that 5 de mayo is a Mexican beer sponsored celebration day. It is technically remembrance of the only battle the republic of Mexico has ever won against a foreign country, never mind that France went on to win that war and impose a French king (actually Austrian I think) in Mexico. Talk about celebrating a losing side.
It is a fair point that no quote exists that says Obama didn't want Comey to continue investigating because they thought the election wrapped up. In lieu of that: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...t-retaliate-against-russia-because-he-thought https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/01/us/politics/obama-trump-russia-election-hacking.html http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/13/obama-shrugs-off-russian-hacking-until-donald-trum/ Read those three articles and reach a different conclusion. I dare you. Tell me a story that explains a lackadaisacal Obama up until December 2016, whereupon he rushes to preserve evidence that the FBI and CIA and been showing him for months. Dude. I'm a huge Obama fan. He didn't want to seem political, out of fear of being seen as tipping the scales. Comey was told to wait for other agencies to corroborate. Those agencies weren't given any orders to hurry. They all thought Trump would lose. Obama blew this one.
And, of course, the barley-fueled tribute to it and him: "Don't Give up the Sip" indeed. Still not sure whether I merely don't like the redesign, or whether I hate it.