If you put a very large sign on your property, and (indirectly) charge your neighbors for the right to write on that sign, would you worry about what they come up with? Would it be alright for one of them to write that Hillary Clinton is a child molester? Remember, this is the sign that you provided, and it is up on your property. That seems to me a reasonably fair, if not perfect, analogy.
As expected, Trump's numbers are tickling down again....He being murdered by women..... A new Quinnipiac poll finds American voters give President Trump a negative 37% to 58% approval rating, down from 40% to 55% earlier this month. By a 57% to 41% margin voters say that Trump is not fit to serve as president. There is a wide gender gap, with men divided 49% to 49% on whether Trump is fit. Women say 65% to 33% he is not fit.
I don't think this would fly in court, Facebook will say they are not a publisher, but it is worth a try.
True, they are not a traditional publisher. Although I suggested in a previous post that they might be considered liable, I don't know if that is the right approach. What I do know is that ignoring the situation doesn't work. Somehow, we need to grapple with the issue of the responsibilities of those who host social-media platforms.
The way we approach child porn may be a way, but it is tricky, and that is something that is not that controversial (in terms of going after the people that distribute it).
It’s not on my property. People only get what I post on or like in their page, not what’s on my page. If someone posts Clinton is a child molester it is not broadcast to my friends, just the friends of the poster. So it’s not a perfect analogy, it’s downright shitty.
Where are you going with this? I said in my analogy that it is on your property. You don't get to change that. So I guess you are arguing that the analogy is bad because Facebook pages aren't Facebook property ... but they are.
I can't help but feel embarrassed....That the US of A voted this cretin and charlatan to be President is simply insane.
I felt the same way immediately after the election for a few weeks. Like "you really did this, huh Whitandia? Well he will surely act like an adult because of the office and our place in the world" Then he's Trumped us since Day 1 and it's been a surreal experience. Like a really smart woman somehow married to a drunken slob who beats & berates her. "How fhe F did I wind up like this?" Our political life under Trump is just depressing & tiring. We didn't have to hear from Obama each day cause we knew he was working.
About every 10 days, I am a bit overcome with thought/feeling. Embarrassment Shame Sadness Ending in anger
It really will depend a lot on jurisdiction but it is hardly a new idea that a social media platform or digital platforms are liable for the content of their users Back in the day Bigsoccer itself used to more strongly enforce copyright infringement and slander precisely because of the risk of liability In Germany, Twitter is now required to allow you to report posts under the strong german laws - e.g. nazi propaganda and twitter must remove it if it infringes. Also you have the analogy of sites like megaupload which were criminally responsible for the uploads of customers So it is far from clear that FB could evade responsibility - especially if its own Algo's send content viral.
The real concern FB has is that do-gooder liberal leftie politicians OR attention seeking righties might regulate them much more strictly. This is why FB has been trying to spin a narrow pathway that this is all about ads that were not trying to influence the elections and that FB is taking steps to identify advertisers. But the actual data is that by far the majority of fake news Americans were exposed to came from unpaid posts - and we've seen that perfectly illustrated in the last days FB could delete those fake news posts and videos - but it is deciding not to. why?
Because they explicitly say they own it and they can do tons of things with the info they acquire from you.. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/21/facebook-terms-condition_n_5551965.html
Your analogy is poor. Facebook uses algorithms to “trend” certain posts. They don’t care about veracity. That’s the problem we’re talking about.