The all encompassing Iran thread - Part 3

Good find man, I'm gonna bookmark that website.

 

You're the first person i see that's been to Iran and has'nt loved Iran and Iranians.
And i've seen a lot of them.

 

Rebels Kill 21 in Southeastern Iran

gotta love the Western media, terrorists kill 21 innocent ppl and suddenly they are rebel forces!!?

 

If an Iran flock of seagulls said it in a "quote"...How?? and why?? do you blame Western media??

~worm~

hey kami...do you know where your head is?? ----> in ur-(_|_)

 

because I know he didn't say rebels... he used the word "Ashrar" which could be translated to any form of bad guys, including terrorists... using the word "rebel" is translators choice which fits well to the agenda followed by the media...

plus the article they are quoting from uses the word "terrorists" more than 3 times!

 

The quote from your link...

"http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060317/ap_on_re_as/iran_rebels_1"


I do not see "the article they are quoting from uses the word "terrorists" more than 3 times!"

Heck don't see it once in there....! What article are you saying they "quoted"?

~worm~

Ok Kami...share what you are smoking!!! Don't bogart!!!

 

maybe you should take your head out of you ass, they are quoting the Iranian guy.. they found the quote in Iranian articles published by Iranian news agencies in Farsi, every single one of them has the word “terrorist” all over it…

from the article:

well I haven't read a single news on this from any Iranian agency that doesn't call this a terrorist attack... this fact has been conveniently ignored by the AP translators...

 

So you are calling the AP a bunch of bullshiters?

~worm~

Sorry...your head is stuck in your ass....mine is just just requesting your ""Fake"" quotes...and proof your head is not inserted too far up ur-ass!

 

Actually kami_kakashi is right, AP has changed "terrorist insurgents" to "rebels" in its translation of the direct quote.

 

Link to the orginal AP news report that states "terrorist" instead of "rebels"..please.

~worm~

 

ISNA -Iran's Football Federation vice president in women's affaires, Khadijeh Sepanj said that in the case of providing suitable facilities and equipments, Iranian women footballer were capable of reaching to honorable success.

She said that in the pervious five years, many successful activities had been performed for improving women football affaires.

"In addition to holding foot saloon regional games, the super league of Iranian women foot saloon with the participation of seven teams in the first and second leg games has been held for the first time," he added.

"Top players will be chosen in these games and they will attend in the Asian qualifying games that will be held in Qatar and in the case of being successful in these qualifying runs, we will enter to final stage of these games in Beijing," he said adding that Iranian women football competitions were a preliminary stage for choosing the members of national team.

 

Examples like this will forever stamp the mistrust of the "West"!

this is truely a shameful act, and the language of calling them "rebels" is self-explanatory.

 

Who exactly are these "terrorists/rebels" that committed this attack? What proof is there that the US and British were behind it? Isn't this kinda like the US pointing to Iran for the surge in more advanced weapons being used by the terrorists/insurgents in Iraq?

Seems like this is a tit for tat situation. Something happens in Iran and it is the fault of the west. Something happens in Iraq and it is the fault of Iran.

Maybe both are guilty and neither has any room to talk.

 

why are you so dumb.. AP is reporting a translation from Iranian news in Farsi, what is so hard to get here?

 

So you are telling me the AP does not have someone who speaks Farsi? Are you that dumb?

~worm~

 

I am telling you that AP didn't conduct an interview with the guy as it is evident in the article they are quoting Iranian news agency... they sure have someone that speaks Farsi and he/she translated this in a way that suits their agenda!

 

this should help answer your question:

 

No it doesn't. Ben is just channeling the rhetoric that IM posts on a regular basis.

 

Journalist Akbar Ganji has just been released from jail

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4715439.stm

 

We need more people like Akbar Ganji in Iran and less people like Kami Kashi.

 

perhaps this song by Iranian band "127" is very fitting for this thread:

"my sweet little terrorist song"

 

Funny clip about Iran and "IEDs"

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Drp6RZ7pCOE&search=iran

 

Jane's recently concluded a two part series analyzing the 'war option' against Iran.

The first part argued that Iran's conventional forces are key to deterring any attacks against Iran, noting that they are capable of defending and detering attacks against Iran's nuclear installations. For those installations that are difficult to defend, such as Bushehr, the second part of Jane's article deals with Iran's 'deterence by punishment' options. That part clearly shows that Iran has the military capability to inflict serious damage on any would be aggressor.

Even without getting into the direct political and economic fallout from any war with Iran, ultimately the Jane's articles (as well as studies on the issue by various US think tanks, war colleges, as well as war games) underline the futility of trying to resolve the impasse with Iran by resorting to force.(1)

Once this realization sets with those who are trigger happy in the US or Israel, and once the nonsense about 'regime change' from outside is abandoned as well, I believe there is a very promising road for both Iran and the West that can finally be taken up. They require that both parties come to the negotiations looking for a 'grand bargain', a 'win-win' solution, with innovative ideas that depart from their original positions on various contentious issues.

----
1- Although there are dissenting voices who claim that the US and Israel together or alone have the capability to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities and prevail in a war with Iran, the balance of military expert opinion is that such options are totally outside of Israel's abilities and they come with too huge a price tag for the US absent an all out, total, war.

 

Whatever helps you sleep better:
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1139395642558&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull
'US could wipe out Iran nukes in 2 days'