News: Rev Roster 2018

Discussion in 'New England Revolution' started by Soccer Doc, Nov 27, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Feldspar

    Feldspar Member+

    Nov 19, 1998
    Boston, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Yeah, I wouldn’t read much into Lee’s absence just now. He’s in catch up mode, even if he’s been fully embraced back to the fold.
     
  2. MM66

    MM66 Member+

    Mar 9, 2009
    Brookline, MA
    Club:
    Real Madrid
    We should keep in mind that Lee might only be in camp to make sure he doesn't give the Revs another option year on him while still maintaining his "trade me or trade me" stance. Kind of like a functional separation even if they're living in the same house.

    However, why is it "working out" rather than working out? Lee plans on playing professional soccer this season. No reason he wouldn't be keeping himself in shape. I'm confident he's in shape enough to play a preseason game.

    And how exactly does one prove oneself to Brad Friedel? We already know Lee is a good player. There's no mystery to that. Also, this is preseason. You know, the time of year where you throw different combinations of guys on the field just to see how it goes. That's not being done with Lee.

    I suspect "prove himself" is a red herring. Lee doesn't want to be there and Friedel's trying to stamp his authority on the team. There's nothing to prove. They're dug in inside opposing trenches. That puts the onus on Burns to move Lee.
     
    RevsLiverpool, VTSoccerFan and dncm repped this.
  3. rkupp

    rkupp Member+

    Jan 3, 2001
    Yeh, could be.
    I think it's very difficult to get in real playing shape without games and/or a real serious conditioning program. I remember that from college - even when I came into camp after doing a ton of running, the first scrimmages would have me gassed.
    Yeah, that's a good question - it's pretty arbitrary I think. Friedel will have to wait a suitable amount of time before working him back in most likely - but suitable is whatever he decides it is.
    Agree.
     
    VTSoccerFan and dncm repped this.
  4. dncm

    dncm Member+

    Apr 22, 2003
    Boston
    I think this is definitely part of it.
     
  5. patfan1

    patfan1 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 19, 1999
    Nashua, NH
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I know some disparage when an agent says Burns is the worst to work with, now you've got GMs attesting to this.

    A preseason survey of GMs done by Goals.com.

     
    firstshirt, MM66, VTSoccerFan and 3 others repped this.
  6. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    pwykes repped this.
  7. patfan1

    patfan1 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 19, 1999
    Nashua, NH
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
     
  8. rkupp

    rkupp Member+

    Jan 3, 2001
    I'm not sure I'd want my GM to be a favorite of others to negotiate with, but probably least favorite in this case means more than just "driving a hard bargain".
     
    LD42, Dr. Sneezy and ToMhIlL repped this.
  9. ToMhIlL

    ToMhIlL Member+

    Feb 18, 1999
    Boxborough, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Yeah, I was going to say something like that. Maybe they don't like dealing with Burns because he's smarter than the average bear, playing 3-D chess when everyone else is playing checkers and 4-5 steps ahead of everyone else! Must be that they just don't want to be left looking foolish, yeah, that's probably it.

    On a positive note, at least Bye got a vote for possible rookie of the year, and Caldwell got votes for underrated. And a couple of ex-Revs were mentioned as being good coaching material when they hang up the boots. I also never thought of Berhalter as being such a great tactician, but what do I know?
     
    Dr. Sneezy repped this.
  10. Revs In First :)

    Aug 15, 2001
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I thought this was an interesting article overall. The things that jumped out at me were the almost unanimous opposition to pro/rel, and the fact that only 14 clubs agreed to participate. I'd be shocked if the Revs participated.
     
    Dr. Sneezy repped this.
  11. patfan1

    patfan1 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 19, 1999
    Nashua, NH
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    That's the point. Least favorite (and by a large margin) goes along with what some agents have said. That Burns is basically useless.

    You can be a hard bargainer (see Ainge, Danny) and still be respected as a GM. "Worst to negotiate with" isn't showing much respect.
     
    Dr. Sneezy and BERich repped this.
  12. Dr. Sneezy

    Dr. Sneezy Member

    Jul 2, 2016
    But disappointing these were the only 2 mentions of the Revolution other than the Burns (which was negative)
     
  13. Cbarbosa201

    Cbarbosa201 New Member

    Benfica
    Portugal
    Jan 19, 2018
    And those signings are.... Probably their Draft Picks :thumbsdown:
     
  14. A Casual Fan

    A Casual Fan Member+

    Mar 22, 2000
     
  15. A Casual Fan

    A Casual Fan Member+

    Mar 22, 2000


     
  16. A Casual Fan

    A Casual Fan Member+

    Mar 22, 2000

    968907924637732864 is not a valid tweet id


     
    VTSoccerFan, patfan1, dncm and 1 other person repped this.
  17. dncm

    dncm Member+

    Apr 22, 2003
    Boston
    Great tweets thanks for posting. And props to Siagel who has done more Revs reporting lately.
     
  18. A Casual Fan

    A Casual Fan Member+

    Mar 22, 2000
    Yes, Sigal is coming up with good stuff.
     
  19. A Casual Fan

    A Casual Fan Member+

    Mar 22, 2000
    968928428987629568 is not a valid tweet id

     
  20. A Casual Fan

    A Casual Fan Member+

    Mar 22, 2000
    Julian corrected a prior tweet -
     
  21. A Casual Fan

    A Casual Fan Member+

    Mar 22, 2000
    968895341260103682 is not a valid tweet id
     
  22. A Casual Fan

    A Casual Fan Member+

    Mar 22, 2000
    968882079957217280 is not a valid tweet id
     
  23. ToMhIlL

    ToMhIlL Member+

    Feb 18, 1999
    Boxborough, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Mistah Kraft's dry cleaning doesn't pick up itself, you know...
     
    firstshirt, MM66 and pwykes repped this.
  24. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  25. firstshirt

    firstshirt Member+

    Bayern München
    United States
    Mar 1, 2000
    Ellington, CT / NK, RI
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    if its down to Burns and negotiating the Revs are screwed
     

Share This Page