I agree. I've always thought the desire for D2 should not be the focus. If you have a regionalized league, you're going to need 4 regions, to make bus trips viable for half the games, and 12-18 teams each, so you have enough variety. If a few things break the right way, that's not impossible in 5 years. 6 teams come over from the NASL, 4 more MLS teams, a few more teams develop internally and there you are.
Its not going to happen. Being forced to be in the CSA soccer league would do economy damages to the clubs to the point of all 3 teams suing the CSA for damages. The fact the CSA new league that is being formed is using wales as an example. When Wales league was formed several welsh teams remained in the english leagues. So there is precedents here. In fact is the 3 clubs are owned by MLS as another person pointed out.
Why would L'Impact move to a smaller city with more pro sports teams competing for fans, sponsors, and media coverage? That doesn't already have its organization's history and infrastructure? And isn't where the owner lives? Toronto FC for Ontario, L'Impact Montreal pour les Quebecois, and Vancouver Whitecaps for western Canada. The country should have three MLS teams. (But not much to gain with a fourth.)
I'm not so sure of that. You don't need to have a whole lot of teams in a league. As soon as the USL reaches 32 clubs, that's enough to have Eastern and Western leagues with 8 teams each at each level. And I would expect MLS to start mandating USL reserve teams within the next 2-3 years, because with only one or two exceptions the affiliations don't seem to be working very well for player development. That, along with expansion and NASL defections, would push the USL to over 40 teams. The one real obstacle may be the geographic imbalance of strong clubs. Right now, the wealthier owners in the USL are mostly in the West, and the clubs that aren't capable of D2 play are mostly older USL clubs on the East Coast. If the USL splits into two divisions on purely financial lines, the divisions are likely to be very different geographically. But bringing in NASL clubs, which are mostly on the East Coast, may solve that problem.
If you pull the "2" teams out, the west is pretty barren, requiring a significant increase in travel out to Midwest.
No decisions made today by US Soccer on division sanctions for NASL, USL.— Subscribe to GrantWahl.com (@GrantWahl) September 24, 2016 No decision yet on USL wanting to be division 2 and NASL wanting to be division 1. I think its not so much about NASL wanting to be division 1 that's not going to happen but what to do to NASL with USL wanting to be division 2.
So in other words, back to the situation that was status quo for about 25 years under Pepe Pinton. ------RM
Not true. Non "2" teams west of the Mississippi: Sacramento Republic OC Blues Arizona United Reno (2017) St Louis Tulsa Oklahoma San Antonio That doesn't include rumored expansion teams: Albuquerque Sol San Diego Boise Tucson FC Austin Aztexs (hiatus) San Francisco & Edmonton (only if NASL folds)
The problem with the top 8 is that if you're the OC Blues, you have 3 away trips by bus and 4 by plane. Ideally, it would be more like 5 by bus and 2 by plane. Regional leagues really need to be regional leagues to put everyone on a solid financial foundation. Adding in the NW is tough as it is, but since they are MLS teams, the cost doesn't matter that much to them. But once (if) it's set up as a western league, I think you'll see San Diego and Tuscon and Fresno and maybe Bakersfield or an Inland Empire team. The more that teams are around California, the more costs are kept down, which makes it more attractive to develop new teams in California - a virtuous circle.
Actually, with a huge assist from the pond scum at Traffic Sports, I think the faux Cosmos are far more culpable for the issues surrounding the current NASL than the original Cosmos were for the demise of the original NASL -- but that's another thread.
Any discussion of culpability needs a heavy dose of Traffic, which wanted to develop a property that would allow them to challenge SUM as a soccer marketing company.
I said Midwest. And that is besides the point. West of the Mississippi is not what you'd call "regional". All those teams have exponentially higher travel without the "2" teams. USL 2/3 ain't happening for quite a while. If NASL fails, and their teams join USL, you'll see four regional divisions before a separate league
Fortunately for the NASL's short term survival prospects, they may be able to rush some unintelligent owners who buy the snake oil. Snake oil wouldn't be a thing if it weren't possible to sell it.