I don't care if you make the playoffs

Discussion in 'New England Revolution' started by MM66, Sep 17, 2016.

  1. SamSam

    SamSam Member

    Feb 26, 2009
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I think another decent opportunity is for the Union to lose to the Red Bulls in 2 weeks who are trying to remain as the number #1 seed in the east or potentially going for supporters shield.
     
  2. KapeGuy

    KapeGuy Member+

    Mar 21, 2010
    Cape Cod
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The union would have to not win both of hteir final games -- if they get 3 points more, the Revs cannot catch them even if they (the Revs) win out.

    Montreal not beating Toronto is the best hope, by far.
     
    TheLostUniversity repped this.
  3. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Agreed, although technically the Revs could catch PHI if they win one and lose one. We be tied at 45 pts (assuming the Revs win their final 2) and each have 12 wins (first tie-breaker). It would come down to Goal Differential, so the Revs would need to make up 13 over the last 2 weeks, which is unlikely.

    If Montreal ties TOR, they would be at 45 points. They would then have to lose the final game against the Revs, leaving them with only 11 wins. That would give the Revs the first tie-breaker.
     
    RevsLiverpool and dncm repped this.
  4. lufty

    lufty Member

    Aug 21, 2000
    Revs just need to win In Chicago. That is all that we should be worrying about right now. Revs must win in Shit-cago.
     
    rkupp and RevsLiverpool repped this.
  5. lufty

    lufty Member

    Aug 21, 2000
    Revs just need to win In Chicago. That is all that we should be worrying about right now. Revs must win in Shit-cago.
     
  6. ToMhIlL

    ToMhIlL Member+

    Feb 18, 1999
    Boxborough, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    So true you gotta say it twice!
     
  7. RevsLiverpool

    RevsLiverpool Member+

    Nov 12, 2005
    Boston
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    #57 RevsLiverpool, Oct 13, 2016
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2016
    Yes - switching to a 4-4-2 a month ago may seem trivial but with the same personnel at his disposal, it's on Heaps and his staff to have recognized the positive impact a formation change could make, earlier. They kept making the same mistakes over and over which is the most frustrating part (to me at least). Given the importance of every point in MLS, that should be enough to get him fired.
     
  8. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Revs not giving up on playoff hopes
    By Brian O'Connell
    ESPN FC
    10/8/2016

     
  9. ToMhIlL

    ToMhIlL Member+

    Feb 18, 1999
    Boxborough, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Yeah, I've got no beef with them having a system that wasn't working, but the problem was staying with it for so long, when even most of us non-coaches could see that a change was in order. And the most maddening thing is, once he finally did what many of us were clamoring for, things started to click--a month too late!
    Only somewhat related, I was reading a Bruins preview article, and everyone was saying how unacceptable it was to miss the playoffs 2 years in a row, and their goal was to not only make the playoffs this year but go deep. Several players commented how every single point matters, winning in OT, shootout points, points in October, everything. They missed out on the playoffs by a single point. If they miss this year, surely heads will roll...

    If they were the Revs, they'd be waiting until New Years for some guy named Yuri or Sergei to arrive from Dynamo Lokamotiv in the Russian League, and when he gets acclimated, surely they will rise to the top of the league then!
     
    RevsLiverpool repped this.
  10. patfan1

    patfan1 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 19, 1999
    Nashua, NH
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Everyone including the owner said that.

    Our owner isn't quite sure the Revs season has started. At least that's what I can tell from checking media reports to see what he's said this season.
     
  11. RevsLiverpool

    RevsLiverpool Member+

    Nov 12, 2005
    Boston
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Right, but you know he wouldn't miss a regular season pats game in Cleveland. Gotta be there to support Tommy B.
     
  12. rkupp

    rkupp Member+

    Jan 3, 2001
    We need a dedicated sarcasm thread - no sticky necessary.
     
    TheLostUniversity repped this.
  13. ToMhIlL

    ToMhIlL Member+

    Feb 18, 1999
    Boxborough, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Pass me some of that Kool-Aid, I'm thirsty!
     
  14. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The Crew's draw with Chicago last night mathematically eliminated Columbus. So the battle for the final 3 playoff spots in the East is down to 4 teams.
     
  15. TheLostUniversity

    Los Angeles Galaxy
    Feb 4, 2007
    Greater Boston
    Club:
    --other--
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    "My pleasure. Drink heartily from the gude rede slime" Cordially, Jim Jones
     
  16. MM66

    MM66 Member+

    Mar 9, 2009
    Brookline, MA
    Club:
    Real Madrid
    It's a good thing I didn't care if the Revs made the playoffs. Hopefully the organization can fix the situation this time around without having to go into a 2010-12 type of hole.
     
  17. SamSam

    SamSam Member

    Feb 26, 2009
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Mathematically, they still have a 2.5% chance, but in reality I think it's much lower than that, maybe 0.02%?
     
  18. ToMhIlL

    ToMhIlL Member+

    Feb 18, 1999
    Boxborough, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Sure, as long as Philly lose and we beat Montreal 11-0, we're good to go!
     
  19. patfan1

    patfan1 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 19, 1999
    Nashua, NH
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Some not so polite responses here.
     
    dncm and VTSoccerFan repped this.
  20. VTSoccerFan

    VTSoccerFan Member+

    New England Revolution, Vermont Catamounts, NCFC
    United States
    Jun 28, 2002
    Cary, NC
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Neat chart/graph. Watch the Revs icon.

     
    NFLPatriot and dncm repped this.
  21. SamSam

    SamSam Member

    Feb 26, 2009
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I don't even think that would put them through- Revs would need to win by 12 goals or more and Philly lose 1-0, because 11-0 would tie Philly on wins, Goal Diff, and Goal for, so it would go to Disciplinary points which the Revs are losing. These are the tiebreakers

    1. Total number of wins: Philly +1
    2. Goal Differential (GD) : Philly +12
    3. Goals For (GF): Philly +11
    4. Fewest Disciplinary Points: Revs +30 as of September 28th (less is better)

    Considering the largest margin of victory in MLS history is 7 goals, let's assume the Revs were able to win 7-0, that would mean Philly would have to lose by 6 goals, or I guess lose 5-0 and pick up 11 yellow cards and 3 reds?
     
    Andy_B and dncm repped this.
  22. Andy_B

    Andy_B Member+

    Feb 2, 1999
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I guess anger is better than apathy...(yes I am grasping at straws)
     
  23. firstshirt

    firstshirt Member+

    Bayern München
    United States
    Mar 1, 2000
    Ellington, CT / NK, RI
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Looking at twitter it angered a lot of people. The majority want Burns and Heaps gone
     

Share This Page