So instead of building a midfield strong team like everyone else, I'm thinking about spicing it up with a studly Counter attacking team. How weak should my midfield be compared to my defense for this to work?
Scores from the last round: kuhnscoot 69 Twenty26Six 43 John_Harkes_6 22 Qamle 20 Kermmy803 18 MLS SupaStr3 17 Stogey23 16 YankHibee 16 bkn0528 16 romagol10 15 mcfarljd 14 Ikari 13 Craig P 13 BrianJames 13 tomwilhelm 10 CrewDust 10 bmalek 8 elciclon 5 AAGunner3 5 Nyghtewynd 5 GROVESHSCOACH 4 Jonc30 4 phillips10 3 fcsg 3 Helghallen 3 celt1997 3 fox point fury 3 Onionsack 2 Goodsport 2 BattalionFC 2 metrostars1969 1 Olesh 1 ardent enthusiast 1 ZeekLTK 1 ej014 1 litlewojo7 1 Spoon 1
He means that your "normal" midfield strength with the CA formation should be 45%. When you choose CA, you then get another 7% penalty on midfield and should be a bit above 40% possession which is considered good for CA. For successful CA, you basically need: - a strong defense (considerably better than the opponent's attack), - as much possession as possible, but less than 50%, - and a strong attack in at least some sectors (i.e., the center or both wings) if not all of them.
yeah, you still want a competitive midfield. Don't understand these guys who go for 15% - course they're younger teams...
See I have changed my tactics a bit lately, I no longer have the 2 posts back to back or whatever, I just slowly work my post count up without many people noticing, until all of the sudden I'm 10 posts up on second place. It'll happen again too.
The problem is you are a wealth of hattrick knowledge and people converse with you. I'm forced to talk to myself... but that is OK, I am enjoying the role of the rogue poster with DD. I think?
well I never considered myself a wealth of HT knowledge, for the most part, no offense meant to anyone, we get a lot of the same questions over and over. It's just a matter of remembering the answer for next time so you can regurgitate it.