Boycott City of Austin

Discussion in 'Columbus Crew' started by ibrew, Oct 31, 2017.

  1. ibrew

    ibrew Member+

    Feb 3, 2008
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    As another poster pointed out to me, eminent domain is currently legal. Precourt is using all legal options available to him. Why shouldn't Columbus? AP will cry all the way to the bank so its not like he won't still get his cash. He's acting like an a-hole, negotiating in bad faith, and thumbing his nose at the city. Why shouldn't they drop that ED bomb on him? If nothing else, it can force both sides to negotiate in good faith.
     
    POdinCowtown repped this.
  2. Timon19

    Timon19 Member+

    Jun 2, 2007
    Akron, OH
    "Just compensation" is the entire point of the debate around ED, along with "public use".

    The phrases are highly subject to abuse, and seizure based on one party's definition (the one with the power) is dubious in the best of circumstances.
     
    puttputtfc repped this.
  3. POdinCowtown

    POdinCowtown Member+

    Jan 15, 2002
    Columbus
    Well, whether or not something is a good public use is decided by the public's representatives, ie city council or the county commission. The price he would get paid is subject to negotiation or a trial if no agreement is reached. If it did go to trial we'd get the comical prospect of Precourt telling the jury how great a market Columbus is and how the team is so valuable here.
     

Share This Page