best method in rating certain player in 1 match

what is the best method in rating certain player in 1 match?

1) full video in 1 match
pros:
had everything you can find for in measuring how good the player is
con:
its hard to focus certain player unless you edit this full video & just focus the certain player that you want to rate

2) video on certain player in 1 match
pros:
easier to measuring how good the player is
con:
this video can be considered flaw when you only edited & show only the good part of the certain player. It should be everything that player did on the pitch whether it was good or bad

3) stat
pros:
goal, assist, tackle, keeper save etc stat can be use in measuring how good the player is
con:
there is no stat on the strength or weakness of the opponent player they faced in the match (example)

anything that you want to add?

i put this thread here cause it relate to the rating of all players include the legendary one

 

i agree on the part of what we expect or value them, in this case, is better to rate the player based on the position

for question:
no.1
i can rate a part of player A performance cause i don't know whether his 300 passes is key pass, or just side pass, but in term of passing ability, he was great cause no every player can manage to pass in high quantity let alone 300 passes

same goes to player B, i don't know whether his scoring is one goal per shot or one goal per 100 shots, if the former, i rated him as a great in finishing, but did quite ok in playmaking department if he did not receive enough pass by his teamates

 

let me add some more method

4) commentator on that match
pros:
it helps if the commentator is good in judging player
con:
if the commentator is not good in judging player, it will give a wrong impression on that player