2017 Women's Soccer NCAA Prediction Contest

Discussion in 'Women's College' started by Soccerhunter, Nov 5, 2017.

  1. Soccerhunter

    Soccerhunter Member+

    Sep 12, 2009
    FINAL SCORING for the Human and Machine Divisions of the Contest

    And the top human bracketmeister for 2017 is.... WENDY'S! Yes indeed, the new champ reigns with a top score of 142. The right balance of picking a few long shots in the first round (then bombing in the second), and then a solid third round before three perfect rounds to finish did the job. Wendy's rankings after each round were: #1, #17, #11, #5, #4, #1.

    So Wendy's.. feel free take a bow, claim the bragging rights for 2017, and weigh in with any (plausible or not) explanation of your brilliant 2017 picks. (The come back next year to be the very first repeat champion in the history of this contest...;))

    For 2017 we had the very first tie for second place. Olelaliga, McSkills, and Crane65 all came in with 136 scores. Well done.

    And thanks to everyone for participating. It wouldn't be as much fun without a significant number of participants.

    Human Division Final 2017 Scores

    142 WENDY’S
    136 CRANE65
    136 McSKILLS
    136 OLELALIGA
    135 NORFOLK
    134 KURT KLINE
    133 JUSTDOIT
    131 HEADSPUN
    131 PLAYSIMPLE
    125 DMTHOMAS49
    121 INGOLDSBY
    117 CASTATE
    115 EUROPE FB FAN
    113 RTD!
    111 KICKITHARD
    111 TIME&SPACE
    108 WALSCD
    105 GOT JUKES?
    100 MPR2477
    98 GLOVE STINKS
    85 BIGWEST
    84 SOCCERHUNTER
    74 MERLIN13
    59 ZIGGY1010

    Machine Division Final 2017 Scores

    The Machine division ended in a typical way. While the Adjusted Non Conference RPI took the top spot, the nature of this division is that the scores were more tightly bunched and were higher on average than the human scores even though the top humans outpaced the machines. (Top human scores were 142, 136, 136, 136... while the top machine winning score was 135. Humans averaged 114.2 while the machine/poll division averaged 121.3.)

    The factor of the machine entries marching more or less in lockstep let to the fall of the Iteration 5 Adjusted RPI entry (which had comfortably held second place for the first five rounds) to 6th place after being the only entry not to pick Stanford as the winner. (In contrast the Humans picked 8 different possible winners with only 1/3 of the 24 humans picking Stanford.)

    All of these phenomena can be explained by the propensity of humans (who presumably are capable of choosing dispassionately) to lead with their hearts and bias their picks toward a few of their favorite teams. This strategy is required for beating the odds and ending up a champion, but it is a losing strategy for most humans as the "house" will win on the average.

    Cheers!

    Machine and Poll Division 2017 Scores


    135 ADJ NON-CONF RPI
    123 MASSEY
    123 UNTD SOC COACH
    122 BENNETT RANK
    121 ADJUSTED RPI
    115 ITRATN 5 ADJ RPI
    110 TOP DRAWER RANK
     
    Cliveworshipper repped this.
  2. cpthomas

    cpthomas BigSoccer Supporter

    Portland Thorns
    United States
    Jan 10, 2008
    Portland, Oregon
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    It's perhaps worth noting that the Machine Division, by itself, averaged 123.2 (RPI versions, Massey, and Bennett). The Poll Division, by itself, averaged 116.5, only slightly better than the humans at 114.2. Top Drawer dragged the Poll Division down. On the other hand, even Top Drawer at 110 surpassed about 1/3 of the field.

    KUDOS TO SOCCERHUNTER FOR DOING THIS!
     
  3. Wendys

    Wendys Member

    Mar 28, 2000
    Thanks for running the contest. Secret to success - know very little about the majority of the teams and get lucky!
     
    HeadSpun repped this.

Share This Page