has anyone followed this rankings before ? what was highest position for an MLS team ? Latvia has a team at 101 and Moldova at 117. What do you think, is MLS that bad or this rankings are inacurate Top 350 (1st May 2006 - 30th April 2007) 302. (240.) Washington DC United USA/2 320. (293.) Dynamo Houston USA/2 ( ) place in the month before http://www.iffhs.de/?10f42e00fa2d17f73702fa3016e23c17f7370eff3702bb1c2bbb6f28f5351e
Pretty weak MLS N&A thread. World Club rankings? really? Snore..... That's bar room arguments, not any real constructive analysis.
DC United are ranked 302nd. CD Olimpia, the team which DC United comfortably eliminated from the CCC this year, is ranked 111th. Houston are ranked 320th. Puntarenas, the team which Houston eliminated in the CCC this year, is ranked 117th. That pretty much tells you all you need to know about relevance of these rankings. They make the FIFA rankings look accurate. Lokomotiv Sofia are ranked 100th, and as a Bulgarian-American I can tell you that they are a team of comparable quality to MLS teams in the top half of the standings. So, I guess what I'm trying to say is, these ratings are total, complete, utter, unadulterated shit.
and rbny is looking way better them dc and a little better then houston so these world standings dont mean anything till each team place each other in a worlds club clup like a world cup that would be sweet 34 best club teams there would be qualifing and all that would be great for the future
I didnt think people would miss the time frame, its in the thread title rankings based on results over an entire year, not a week or a month
Ummm...haven't we discussed IFFHS rankings on BigSoccer before? Look it up. They ranking system is completely not appropriate to ranking anything outside of Europe.