www.onthesidelines.org DiCicco talks about why San Diego got it instead...it's near the end of the article.
Being the article is on April 1 and such a bonehead idea I'm anticipating someone will say April fools.
the only foolish thing about it is that dicicco would probably make more money having the game in dc, even though it would look worse on tv.
Yes, but having the game on ESPN instead of PAX has to be worth a lot (in more than just short-term monetary return), and ESPN wouldn't want to show a half-empty RFK.