Is it just me, or are these guys stacking the deck against themselves with their predictions? If you assume three potential outcomes per game (win for team A, win for team B, or a draw) you have at the simplest analysis a 1 in 3 chance of being correct (except Marc and Jeff are short of even that hit ratio, because as Jeff openly acknowledges, he sucks at predictions). Adjusting your 1 in 3 odds for the fact that you aren't picking against a spread like you would be in football, and maybe you should be able to do better than 33% -- but in a league with this much parity, probably not by much.
with the way things have been going this season they'd probably have better luck if they just picked each game to finish in a draw.