Who should get MLS expansion franchise?

Discussion in 'United Soccer Leagues' started by Fireball_Dan, Apr 29, 2003.

  1. Fireball_Dan

    Fireball_Dan New Member

    Jul 10, 2001
    Palos Park, IL
    #1 Fireball_Dan, Apr 29, 2003
    Which city deserves to get an MLS team in 2005? You may post in a second city if you like.
     
  2. VonMorrisky

    VonMorrisky New Member

    Oct 1, 2001
    Center of the known universe
    #2 VonMorrisky, Apr 30, 2003
    Why is this in the USL forum and not the MLS Expansion forum? Half the cities you list don't even have USL teams.
     
  3. Fireball_Dan

    Fireball_Dan New Member

    Jul 10, 2001
    Palos Park, IL
    #3 Fireball_Dan, Apr 30, 2003
    These were the cities that have been most mentioned in this subject. At one time or another, some of these cities had NASL franchises. I'm sure Souunders, Timbers, and Rhinos fans have an opinion on this in particular.
     
  4. VonMorrisky

    VonMorrisky New Member

    Oct 1, 2001
    Center of the known universe
    #4 VonMorrisky, May 2, 2003
    I'm sure Sounders, Timbers, and Rhinos fans have opinions on this matter. The fact that they have opinions doesn't prevent them from going over to the MLS Expansion forum, where this thread belongs.

    So why is this thread here and not in the MLS Expansion forum?
     
  5. RhinosBoy21

    RhinosBoy21 New Member

    Oct 18, 2001
    Rochester NY, but or
    #5 RhinosBoy21, May 2, 2003
    Dude let it go man. It's ok, relax. This was a good place to put it, he wanted opinions from people who actually SEE the a-league teams on regular basis compared to the cities who don't.

    Stop being a web board nazi man.
     

Share This Page