Who is "Ungrateful"? America, France, Fascism, and Debts of History

Discussion in 'Politics & Current Events' started by Mel Brennan, Feb 21, 2003.

  1. Mel Brennan

    Mel Brennan AN INTERVIDUAL

    Apr 8, 2002
    Club:
    Paris Saint Germain FC
    Paul Street, dropping science here, of which the following is an excerpt:

    ...A funny thing forgotten by practitioners of the new American sport of French-bashing is that US policymakers helped enable the rise of European fascism that culminated in Hitler’s march of terror. As is apparent from the relevant historical literature, the US watched with approval as Fascist darkness set over Europe during the inter-war years. American policymakers saw Italian, Spanish, German and other strains of the European fascist disease as a welcome counter to the Soviet threat – essentially the demonstration Russia made of the possibilities for modernization (industrialization, urbanization, and nation- building) outside the capitalist world system – and anti-capitalist social democracy within Western European states.

    In 1937, the US State Department’s European Division argued that European fascism was compatible with America’s economic interests. This key diplomatic agency reported that fascism’s rise was a natural response of “the rich and middle classes” to the threat posed by “dissatisfied masses,” who, with the “the example of the Russian Revolution before them,” might “swing to the left.”...

    ...Perhaps the French should launch a public relations counter campaign, accusing American policymakers of being ungrateful for the heroic sacrifices made by France to enable the very birth of the United States. The French do feel gratitude for the role Americans played in expelling the Nazis. When they see George W. Bush sneering from their television screens about the concocted threat posed by Iraq, however, they do not flash back to Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the heroic struggle against world fascism. They see a dangerous new potential world dictator, one who manufactures exaggerated foreign threats to justify a Nazi-like drive for unchallenged world power.

    What is the moral calculus whereby one nation’s historical debt to a stronger nation’s past opposition to a shared monstrous enemy mandates the weaker state’s supine subservience to the stronger state’s current global agenda – even when that agenda puts the weaker state at significant risk?...


    Come wit it...
     
  2. Eric B

    Eric B Member

    Feb 21, 2000
    the LBC
    Club:
    Los Angeles Galaxy
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    You're black, we get it, already, but shouldn't it be dropping "knowledge"?
     
  3. Mel Brennan

    Mel Brennan AN INTERVIDUAL

    Apr 8, 2002
    Club:
    Paris Saint Germain FC
    Re: Re: Who is "Ungrateful"? America, France, Fascism, and Debts of History

    Peace, dun...it can be both kid...as am I, feel me?My bad, I got my nose open for mad old school right now, and it just can't be helped; Vinyl is spinning at my crib right now, and I'm all up in the zone, "naw meen?" Audi 5 G's...
     
  4. Ghost

    Ghost Member+

    Sep 5, 2001
    So what would have been more effective when the Germans, say, marched into the Rhineland, a feckless League of Nations throwing edicts and diplomatic papers at them, or a unilateral oor multilateral US force interested in maintaining stability in the region?
     
  5. Nate505

    Nate505 Member

    Feb 10, 2002
    Colorado
    The French Popular Front government of the middle 1930s was an example of the popular left threat that made fascism acceptable to American officials before Hitler really launched his drive for a New World Order. It is true that fascism became an avowed US enemy during WWII. This did not occur, however, until fascism, holding power in two leading imperialist states, directly attacked American interests.

    So the US didn't oppose facism until two leading facist states directly attacked American interests, yet we established a wartime protectorate over Greenland (a Dutch possession) before we entered WW2, we placed an embargo of oil against Japan before Pearl Harbor, and loaned England destroyers. That doesn't sound like supporting facism to me, at least not the major facist countries at that time.

    The American right wants to view France’s position on US Iraq policy as a French referendum on its historical debts to other nations. Fine – perhaps, then, we should see France’s resistance to the Bush War Party as an expression of its deep gratitude to Russia, which opposes Bush’s Iraq campaign and which lost 25 million lives in the struggle against fascism-Nazism. No nation did more than Russia to stop the Nazis.

    Boy, he blasts the US for intervening in the war out of self interests, than says that no nation did more than Russia to stop the Nazis, a nation that acted totally out of self interest, a nation that collaborated with the Nazis to divide up Poland. Funny stuff....but reading the guy's paper, it's obvious he has a big axe to grind.
     
  6. Eric B

    Eric B Member

    Feb 21, 2000
    the LBC
    Club:
    Los Angeles Galaxy
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Re: Re: Re: Who is "Ungrateful"? America, France, Fascism, and Debts of History

    I hear ya...
     
  7. mannyfreshstunna

    mannyfreshstunna New Member

    Feb 7, 2003
    Naperville, no less

    I don't even know where to start here. Oh yea we supported facism.....(pause for dramatic effect) You have to remember that the US was still coming off its years of being very isolationist. We didn't want to get dragged into another european war. Wouldn't it be the job of germany's neighbors to keep them in check? Especially France, who insisted on the ridiculous Versaille treaty to "punish" germany. Even the English thought it to be too harsh. France can be blamed for the rise of facism in germany and italy. In the Versaille treaty it insisted upon, france gave its ally italy, almost nothing in return for fighting the Central powers. Italy became extremely dillusioned by this snub, and here comes benito, who claims he can make italy great again. they thought that sounded good, so benito marches on rome and bingo, facist gov't no. one had been installed due to france's blindness. A young adolf hitler is inspired by mussolini's march on rome, and wants to better express his political beliefs. So with some friends he starts the National Sozialisten Deutsche Arbeiters Partei, also affectionately known as the nazi party. He tries to overthrow the weimar republic in 1923, and fails, but that only steels his determination to punish everyone. Enter the great depression, and adolf wins the election. Then it was time to make the allies pay (along with the jews, danes, dutch, belgians, yugoslavs, soviets, greeks, albanians, czechs, and norwegians) You're right, i've dealt France an unfair hand. Thank you France, for doing your part to fight Facism, while we earnestly supported it. I was in the wrong believing that France created, and then didn't stand up to the very monster that they created. Glad that's all straightened out. France, I salute you!!
     
  8. Dan Loney

    Dan Loney BigSoccer Supporter

    Mar 10, 2000
    Cincilluminati
    Club:
    Los Angeles Sol
    Nat'l Team:
    Philippines
    Re: Re: Who is "Ungrateful"? America, France, Fascism, and Debts of History

    Prussia made France pay a similarly massive reparation after the 1870 war, to be paid over decades - which the French paid ahead of schedule.

    Yes, the exponential rise in the effectiveness of war should have made the French realize that reparations followed by revenge was a recipe for destruction. But France had plenty of reason to insist on reparations. It was a mistake, in retrospect, but it's not accurate to say the Versailles treaty was harsh beyond reason.

    Yes, the Allies should not have put reparations on a regime that didn't exist anymore, but that's what the Germans did in 1870. Yes, the Allies should have been more solicitous to a struggling democracy, but no one told the Weimar Republic to use hyperinflation as a matter of policy.

    Demonizing America's oldest friend in the world isn't going to make invading Iraq any better an idea, while we're on the subject.
     
  9. mannyfreshstunna

    mannyfreshstunna New Member

    Feb 7, 2003
    Naperville, no less
    Re: Re: Re: Who is "Ungrateful"? America, France, Fascism, and Debts of History

     
  10. irishFS1921

    irishFS1921 New Member

    Aug 2, 2002
    WB05 Compound
    semi-unrelated.

    so i'm sitting in my campaigns class and we're discussing nicholas trist. we must have spent 45 minutes on him. and it hits me.

    in a previous life universal WAS nicholas trist. if you can't make the connection i'll spell it out for you.
     
  11. Mel Brennan

    Mel Brennan AN INTERVIDUAL

    Apr 8, 2002
    Club:
    Paris Saint Germain FC
    To Tell The Truth

    Wow. Talking about arguing around the issues. Isn't one important question...

    IS THIS TRUE?

    "As is apparent from the relevant historical literature, the US watched with approval as Fascist darkness set over Europe during the inter-war years. American policymakers saw Italian, Spanish, German and other strains of the European fascist disease as a welcome counter to the Soviet threat – essentially the demonstration Russia made of the possibilities for modernization (industrialization, urbanization, and nation- building) outside the capitalist world system – and anti-capitalist social democracy within Western European states.

    In 1937, the US State Department’s European Division argued that European fascism was compatible with America’s economic interests. This key diplomatic agency reported that fascism’s rise was a natural response of “the rich and middle classes” to the threat posed by “dissatisfied masses,” who, with the “the example of the Russian Revolution before them,” might “swing to the left.”...


    Tell the Truth...
     
  12. comme

    comme Moderator
    Staff Member

    Feb 21, 2003
    Above someone said that nobody did more than Russia to stop the Nazis. simply not true. Stalin signed a non-agression pact with Hitler in 38 and received half of poland after the German conquest. It was only when attacked themselves that the russians responded against the Nazis. the only nations to declare war on a fascist regime without first being attacked were britain and france. Britain did more than any other to stop the Nazis.
    As for france causing Fascism that is a load of rubbish. The versailles treaty was both too harsh and not harsh enough, it was the responsibility of all who agreed it, not just france.
     
  13. dfb547490

    dfb547490 New Member

    Feb 9, 2000
    The Heights
    Re: To Tell The Truth

    Could be true. Communism appeared to pose more of a threat to US interests than did fascism. Obviously we didn't know that Hitler would invade other countries and murder 12 million people, that Franco would get his country embroiled in a bloody civil war, or that Mussolini would invade hapless targets like Albania and Ethiopia. Had we known this, any sympathy we might have had for fascist leaders between the wars would not have been there.

    And even from a strictly humanitarian standpoint, Hitler wasn't any worse than Stalin, and Mussolini and Franco were a hell of a lot better.


    Alex
     
  14. Chicago1871

    Chicago1871 Member

    Apr 21, 2001
    Well, now that we have unequivocally established that the US is responsible, in some way or another, for everything evil that has ever happened on this planet we can be assured that there is nothing left to argue. However, there is one question that still remains. Where are my pants?
     
  15. Mel Brennan

    Mel Brennan AN INTERVIDUAL

    Apr 8, 2002
    Club:
    Paris Saint Germain FC
    Why is it when someone argues that a key responsibility of a democracy, particularly one that claims to be "the greatest nation on the earth," is one of specific, comprehensive, and historic accountability for its actions/review thereof, someone like you always reduces that to "Fine, fine...the U.S. is bad, and did everything bad that's ever been done," or some extreme statement like that?

    Your pants are over your freakin' head, and covering your eyes, if you cannot see that its ESSENTIALLY important for those that claim to lead anyone or anything, let alone lead the world, to have their own house in order when calling others to task, period. You are truly blind, and its an affliction of your own making.
     
  16. Chicago1871

    Chicago1871 Member

    Apr 21, 2001
    If you want to live a long life, I suggest you relax a bit. Getting to worked up over politics will take you down a very ugly road...just look at Ted Kennedy. Your mirrored sunglasses (with the mirror on the inside) are distorting your view of the world. You apparently think that they world should be a perfect place with everyone accepting responsibility for everything. Well, let me join your fight. Right now I am going to drive home from school and walk into the pharmacy where I once stole a Snickers bar from and confess. I suggest everyone does the same...you will feel a lot better, and so will Uni.

    I think it was everyones favorite Oklahoman who said it best, "The Politics Forum is just a rivalry forum for people without a sense of humor."
     
  17. verybdog

    verybdog New Member

    Jun 29, 2001
    Houyhnhnms
    Of course, there's no such thing called humorous politics.
     
  18. MikeLastort2

    MikeLastort2 Member

    Mar 28, 2002
    Takoma Park, MD
    Nor political humor. Now if someone would tell just Mark Russell.
     
  19. verybdog

    verybdog New Member

    Jun 29, 2001
    Houyhnhnms
    ...that he's political trolling?
     
  20. Mel Brennan

    Mel Brennan AN INTERVIDUAL

    Apr 8, 2002
    Club:
    Paris Saint Germain FC
    Thanks for the nothing of a retort the above is.
     
  21. Chicago1871

    Chicago1871 Member

    Apr 21, 2001
    What were you expecting? Over the last two weeks we have disagreed on everything surrounding the possibility of this action. I'm pretty much on one side, and you're on the other. What could I possibly say to change your mind?

    Lighten up Francis.
     
  22. Mel Brennan

    Mel Brennan AN INTERVIDUAL

    Apr 8, 2002
    Club:
    Paris Saint Germain FC
    ...

    nothing.

    ...

    ?

    ...

    nothing at all.
     
  23. Chicago1871

    Chicago1871 Member

    Apr 21, 2001
    Answer my question if you are going to play 'cut and paste.' What could I possibly say to convince you to look at it from another perspective? I can answer it for you. There is nothing that I could say. You at set in your opinion and have no apparent desire to do as little as even change your perspective.
     
  24. Mel Brennan

    Mel Brennan AN INTERVIDUAL

    Apr 8, 2002
    Club:
    Paris Saint Germain FC
    Paradigm Shift

    It is true that I do not post here in order to have my mind changed on much. Yet, I'll give you this:

    If you mean by "change my mind," "change my mind on the issue of whether or not to set into motion by means of military force the doctrine of pre-emptive action," well, no, there's nothing that you could say to convince me that we make ourselves (the U.S.) and the rest of the world safer by being a world leader who is the first nation in the Modern Age to set into military motion a mode of operation that says "We are going to attack you now for what you might do, or be capable of doing, in the future."

    I remember cueing to go into a South Jersey club named Mahorn's (named for former basketball player Rick Mahorn), on its grand opening night...back in the early 90's or so, if I remember correctly. What I DO remember is that a few couples in front of us was this fine, FINE model-esque, tall, woman. Her company for the night was this fairly freakin' huge dude; I'm 6'7", 255; this guy made me look like I was an extra on the Time Bandits set.

    Anyway, just before they walked in ahead of us, the dude turns to the angel, and slaps the shit out of her. I mean hard. Harder than I've ever seen anyone ever open-hand struck. She was knocked on her ass.

    She got up, and while the line to get in was astonished into silence, she, sobbing, asked the dude "Why did you do that?"

    He said "That's for the shit you MIGHT do in here...now go inside."

    Amazingly, she went inside.

    Then, like three weeks later, she stabbed that motherfucker three times and nearly took his life: front page of the Philadelphia Inquirer and the Burlington County Times.

    I never forgot that, I'm sure HE didn't either. Pre-emption didn't seem to work, over the longer term, in that situation, and I'm of the opinion that over the longer term it will not work for us, that it will likely bring more violence our way; more violence for my kids, for my family, for fellow citizens.

    Just as the crowd that night asked (well, after they asked, "Why the hell is she STILL going INTO the club with that fool?") "Weren't there a variety of things that guy could have done short of that," I've got to ask the Bush administration where the innovation, the creativity, of a solution other than a killing solution, has gone.

    I mean, Jesus, where would we all be now if THIS administration had been in place, instead of the Kennedy one, to deal with the nuance and subtle escalation that was the Cuban Missile Crisis?

    In the Stone Age, as you well know.

    Have I changed YOUR perspective?
     
  25. TheWakeUpBomb

    TheWakeUpBomb Member

    Mar 2, 2000
    New York, NY
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Re: Paradigm Shift

    I can say you've changed my perspective on the value of word economy.
     

Share This Page