Brazilian National Team side ..... is much more easier to play always than Northern Ireland or Liberia or Portugal or Netherlands ..or Nigeria or Cameroon and to win Titles always Andrew Jennings journalist .... CBF ... Nike ..... Barcelona FC ... Fifa says : are corrupt ... manipulated world football Brazil is in favor and West Germany mainly John Havelange and Doctor Ricardo Teixeira !
C. Ronaldo 0, 97 % .. All career Romário 0, 93 % ..All career Ronaldo Nazario 0, 89 %......All career C. Ronaldo has more pre-assists than Ronaldo Nazario All career only to use the metrics from National Team Side ( Brazil vs Portugal ) it is wrong to do for sure .! C. Ronaldo .. is better and more complete player than Nazario from day and night !
Eusebio arrived in a Benfica team that was already European champion in 1960 against Barcelona. That Benfica team was very good with Coluna, Jose Augusto etc In the Champions League comparison, Eusebio was favored for being European and joining a champion team since young age. His performance in 1966 was excellent, but it doesn't look like his standard performance, with qualifying round exits in two World Cups and two Euros. Eusebio's goal tally may have been inflated because he played in the Portuguese league, which was much weaker than the Italian or Spanish leagues of the 90s. So, i lean towards Ronaldo Nazario but I respect your opinion.
Goals in WC/European Cup/CL tournaments Eusebio 55 goals in 71 games 0.77 goals per game Ronaldo Nazario 29 goals in 59 games 0.49 goals per game good player vs super player
yes .... Eusebio 12 National Leagues won All career Ronaldo Nazario ... 1 National League won 2002/03 All career Eusebio 12 against Ronaldo Nazario 1 !
Yes, but Ronaldo Nazario has a good advantage in assists One of the strengths of Ronaldo Nazario, who was the G+A leader in two World Cups (1998 and 2002) and one World Cup qualifier (2006). Not that he was a great passer. But he was dangerous Yes, but these were Portuguese league titles I think they had a similar playing style, physically strong, similar height, hungry for goals, but Ronaldo Nazario has a better career and faced stronger competition throughout his career. But I respect different opinions
I don't believe that Eusebio has lesser assists than Ronaldo Nazario .. All career is wrong to confirm this that Eusebio is lesser assister than Nazario Ronaldo Nazario 19 matches ... 15 goals ... 4 assists .. 3 assists in 1998 ( to bebeto and rivaldo ) 1 assist ( to Adriano Drunk boy ) in 2006 dribbles made per 90 minutes 3,42 % per game vs Eusebio 6 matches ..... 9 goals ... 2 assists ( 1 direct assist to Torres corner-kick and 1 indirect assist crossing with left foot to Simões against Brazil 3-1 ) dribbles made per 90 minutes 5,83 % per game 1966 go to 42: 30 minutes in the first half against Feyenoord in 1962 Eusebio had Long Range Pass better than Ronaldo Nazario had Crossing with either feet better too .. drawing with Ronaldo Nazario Plays one-twos ... or short passes ... and pass deeper you mean that was easier to play against Real Madrid of PUskas ,,, Di Stefano ... Gento ... Santamaria Santos FC Pelé Zito ..Gilmar Mauro Ramos ... Carlos Alberto Torres ...Clodoaldo ....Toninho Guerreiro .. Penarol ... Figueroa ... Pedro Rocha ... Spencer than against the limited Carles Puyol Barcelona ... Sensini ... Ayala Vivas Chamot???
Eusebio being a superior all round attacker to Ronaldo Nazario is closer to a fact than a opinion it’s highly amusing that when we come to the guy with 1.5 goals per game in the so called highest standard of competition along with his almost 6 dribbles per game now all of a sudden dribbles don’t matter and Ronaldo Nazários shitty 2 yard side way assists matter That’s why you are the king of changing the goalposts As for the rest You can be big and strong with similar height and still get knocked the f**k out Ever heard of this guy And Eusebios career literally KOs R9s
yes ..... for sure .. ! i agree with you dear mate ! hahahahaha ! with Ronaldo Nazario ... Ronaldinho Gaucho is too much Bla bla bla bla bla always Fan Boys of them .... are crazy people for sure .. only they are watching highlights at Dribbles ... firulas at You tube that's it man are mental sick people
The typicals are missing this point completely, but no surprise coming from them. Also they are missing R9 had huge impact on his best three-peak years (96/97, 97/98 and 02/03), performing very well in the European stage for his clubs here.
Yes, because the entire world is unanimous about R9, and yet, somehow completely wrong about him. And two dudes on BigSoccer know better. This forum never ceases to amaze me.
But Carlito 86 .... and Isaias Serafim o brasileiro they are not lying in anytime here on this forum bring it back the numbers correctly ! and concret things ! is question to respect the them visions as well !
Maybe you are too limited too think in that way. I answered them in another threads already... it is total waste of time... as well as I have better points than them (completely), they are just using ad-hominens (as you can see per this thread), mediocre arguments and flawed analogies. R9 is probably the second Best Brazilian player OAT (or the third one if you consider Garrincha's 62 as immaculate), definitely ahead of Neymar, Zico or Romário.. players that I covered largely in the past; Brazil's never had a talent who was World's Best Player at age of 20 and probably will never have again.
Pelé is clearly the best Brazilian player OAT and for me clearly the GOAT. I usually put Messi and Cruyff alongside him, but a level below both.