Which F.O. would you want to run your team?

Discussion in 'MLS: General' started by wolfp10, Jan 30, 2008.

  1. wolfp10

    wolfp10 Member

    Sep 25, 2005
    Which MLS Front Office would you want to run your team?
     
  2. Transparent_Human

    Oct 15, 2006
    Pale blue dot
    Club:
    Celtic FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Mauritius
    D.C. Because their F.O "gets it" on the field, off the field, and in the stands.
     
  3. PJohnson

    PJohnson Member+

    DC United
    Dec 16, 2004
    South Dakota
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I support DC United. And I would not trade our front office for any other in MLS. Which is not to say there aren't other clubs in MLS that are doing things the right way. Because there are.
     
  4. bwidell

    bwidell Member+

    Apr 19, 2005
    Manchester, NH
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I had to go with DCU's. To quote Paul Lukas, they "Get It™."
     
  5. Trevallion

    Trevallion Member

    May 3, 2006
    The Yakima Valley
    I almost voted for DC...However, the uncertainty of their stadium situation caused me to vote for another...

    I vote Kansas City Wizards for the best front office. The OnGoal ownership group has really got things moving in the right direction in KC. The soccer stadium at the Three Trails Development is going to be amazing!

    Onalfo and Vermes have also shown that they can find talent to play on the pitch (Marinelli, Colombo and Trujillo).

    Well, that's my .$02.
     
  6. Naco

    Naco Member

    Aug 5, 2001
    Milwaukee/Peter Wilt.
     
  7. NebraskaAddick

    Aug 26, 2005
    Omaha, NE
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'm a Red Bulls fan, and I think I will love them in a couple years,

    But at this moment I have to say DC United, because they seem to be acting like a real professional soccer club, with the collecting of transfer money, loaning players, and scouting South America like nobody else's business.

    New England's FO probably never even heard of the concept of loaning a player from another club. That's just not done in American sports.
     
  8. ritsoccer86

    ritsoccer86 Member

    Jul 18, 2005
    1. DC
    2. RedBull
    3. Houston
    4. RSL
    5. Fire - Peter Wilt era
    6. TFC
     
  9. Dyn-MO

    Dyn-MO Red Card

    Nov 18, 2007
    Soccerville
    I pick DC United any time of the year. These folks definitely know how to run a "soccer" club. They will remain the strongest FO as long as they don't bring in Lalas and his likes :eek:
     
  10. Calexico77

    Calexico77 Member

    Sep 19, 2003
    Mid-City LA
    Club:
    Los Angeles Galaxy
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Toronto. I'd pick DC, but they're still in RFK.
     
  11. Midnight Attack

    Mar 13, 2005
    U.S.A|Jamaica|DCU
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'll stick with DC. I don't think any other F.O. would have even bothered to build a stadium in DC.
     
  12. PJohnson

    PJohnson Member+

    DC United
    Dec 16, 2004
    South Dakota
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    So in your mind TFC has better front office personnel because they play in a new stadium that was approved prior to their existance? That's great logic. :rolleyes:
     
  13. SixKick

    SixKick Moderator
    Staff Member

    Nov 13, 2000
    Club:
    Club América
    Nat'l Team:
    Mexico
    Wilt era should be number 1 or 2.
     
  14. TopDogg

    TopDogg Member

    Jan 31, 2000
    Toronto
    Club:
    Toronto FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Canada
    The stadium was approved and built as a direct result of TFC's (through I/O MLSE) involvement.
     
  15. ritsoccer86

    ritsoccer86 Member

    Jul 18, 2005
    I would say 2, not 1. It was exciting to watch those old Chicago days on ESPN.

    I still remember that Hristo blast from like 25 to 30 yards out. It was one of the most memorable goals I have ever seen during my time of watching MLS.
     
  16. Buzz Killington

    Buzz Killington Member+

    Oct 6, 2002
    Lee's Summit
    Club:
    Kansas City Wizards
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    OnGoal. They're going about everything the right way, have a lot of contact with the fans and ideas they have.
     
  17. socluis90

    socluis90 Member+

    Aug 11, 2004
    So Cal
    Club:
    Los Angeles Galaxy
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I am extremely proud of the Galaxy FO...













    NOT!


    Houston seems like the most respectable to me although DC is obviously right up there. Now what FO do I not want? New England, Colorado, Columbus and Dallas. NO offense to the fans...
     
  18. TheQuakesRockMySocks

    Dec 20, 2007
    BlogVille, CA
    I completely agree with you brother. And by the way.

    [​IMG]

    Those front offices (FCD, Columbus, and Colorado) should be saying, "we're not worthy" to Houston, and DCU.
     
  19. cjgwizard

    cjgwizard Member

    Apr 25, 2006
    LSP, section 129
    Club:
    Sporting Kansas City
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'm very pleased with how OnGoal has moved the Wizards in the right direction. Their interest in the fans' opinions is huge, and their new blog is great for finding out inside info on what is going on both on and off the field.

    Regarding player acquisition, I must admit I am a bit jealous of DC though. :D
     
  20. dcchelseafc

    dcchelseafc Member+

    DC United
    Sep 2, 2005
    Naptown
    Club:
    DC United
    who the fcuk picked LALA FO? you are a fool just like there FO!

    DC, not only because I am a supporter, but they understand the supporters, the fans, and that play on the pitch comes first, not some big name DP.

    after that TFC, lets see if they keep it up.
     
  21. TFCSteve

    TFCSteve Member

    Apr 16, 2007
    Toronto
    I said TFC because I'm loyal like that, and they understand the fans (though not how to win yet, if they can't get that down in the near future, my opinion will drop).

    The only other FO in the league I would want is DC. They obviously "get" the fan culture, and they produce winning teams. As soon as DC gets a stadium (come on downtown) they are going to be near perfect.
     
  22. Transparent_Human

    Oct 15, 2006
    Pale blue dot
    Club:
    Celtic FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Mauritius
    I'd love to know who picked New England and if they actually have seen/heard what comes out of our F.O
     
  23. ToMhIlL

    ToMhIlL Member+

    Feb 18, 1999
    Boxborough, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I voted for Toronto because they treat the sport seriously, and not just something for the kids to do when they are sick of going to Chuck-e-Cheese again. But I could have easily voted for DC because they actually try to improve their team in the off-season, they respect the balance of different fan types and they do a lot of things well. Houston and Kansas City are also good bets. Chicago would have been a few years ago.

    You can order the teams in any way you like, but the one team that stands out is New England. If there ever was a team that screams "I don't give a sh1t whatsoever!" it would be them. Every team has either a new stadium, one under construction, or one in the planning stages. Except one. Ten years from now, it will be the same story. Expansion cities that are not even on the radar screen will be playing games in their new stadiums before the Revs will. But it doesn't matter, because Kraft owns the team and the stadium.

    I am a fan of my team. I care if they win games. I do not care what the owner's financial portfolio looks like, as long as he is solvent enough to properly support his team (yeah, I'm looking at YOU, Horowitz!) Some of the Kool-Aid drinkers in NE say Kraft is a "shrewd businessman" and is "savvy" about what needs to be done. No. He is a cheap prick who only started the Revs because he thought they'd make money for him and is not committed to spending one skinny dime more than he has to. Oh yeah, he's been nominated for the US Soccer Hall of Fame in the "builder" category.
     
  24. PJohnson

    PJohnson Member+

    DC United
    Dec 16, 2004
    South Dakota
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Public money was already committed as part of the Youth World Cup bid. MLSE certainly put it over the top. But they have not had to engage in a 12 year fight with a city government that has misled them, and pulled the rug out from under them. That's what the DC front office has had to deal with. MLSE simply walked into the deal.

    Look, I'm not putting down TFC or it's front office. I happen to think they are one of the clubs that get a lot of things right. Although they still need to prove it on the pitch. But you give them WAY to much credit. IMO
     
  25. kirsoccer

    kirsoccer BigSoccer Supporter

    Jun 29, 2007
    My bet is that his team will not win a game in MLS again this season. :D
     

Share This Page