I would like to see responses, from OP and people from whatever he copied that from, to my above post.
I didn't look at those threads. On the threads that I've read and the ones that you have made comments on, it doesn't seem that you have anything nice to say about them. Who were the best in 2003, if not Milan?
No-one. There doesn't have to be a best does there. If anyone it when Juve was everyone was fit and available. In football as we know the best doesn't always win.
Well then, your argument has come full circle. I await further engaging discussions with you regarding ferris-wheels and merry-go-rounds.
hope celtic draw liverpool in c l - put them out 2 years ago ,will again, remember hartson ! u lot were 5th in league last year, why are you in it ? at least us and the gers were 1st and 2nd . dont say because you won it !do you think everton will win it this year they were above you lot in the league.? the tic and the gers would beat them easily !!!!!!only two teams can win our league only 3 can win yours arsenal,man u ,chelsea so your league is not as good as you make out!!!
Are you feeling alright? If only two teams are contenders for a league title, that means that the league is weak. Celtic and Rangers are the only decent teams in Scotland and the rest of them are weak as piss.
Hmm its funny...when was the last time either Celtic or Rangers won the CL? trying to remember. o wait i remember...NEVER. All any team in scotland has won is the old european cup (and that was decades ago). As for putting us out 2 years ago (in the UEFA cup not the CL), well that was 2 years ago and we have an almost completly new team. O and did i ever mention how good our league is? no i dont think i did, but now that u mention it we had one semi finalist last year and a european champion...so i honestly dont know what u are talking about. (btw thanx...as i said before, sour grapes make me laugh)