as the Topic here is about Diego Armando Maradona .. i'll show you One Assist (Opta) Cruyff and one Assist Maradona (Opta and Non_opta ) Johan Cruyff 1 Opta ...Free-Kick Passing and Maradona 1 Opta ..Low Crosses and 1 Pre_assist Opta ...Long range Ball ... Copa del Rey Final 1983
Im not sure if many people here have seen this one Now to my knowledge there exists two videos of Cruyff registering 3 assists in one match This and the one vs Feyenoord 1974/75(same season) It’s good this video exists because transfermarket literally awards him 0 assists for this match https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/fc-barcelona_sk-voest-linz/index/spielbericht/1168857 So for the record Johan Cruyff produced 0 goals and 7 assists in 8 EC matches in 1974/75 His team scored 15 goals so he was directly involved in 46.6%. of his teams goals.
cruyff 1 Opta Assist ... with left foot and 1 Pre_assist Opta with left foot . and 2 Opta Assists Diego
Cruyff 1 Opta Free-Kick taking to Ruud Gullit ... https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xt0obz 3 Opta Assists 1 Passing deeper 1 Outside curve of foot " trivela " quaresma passing .. 1 Free-Kick taking ... to Houtman ... Maradona 1 Opta Assist Maradona 1 Pre-assist Opta ... against West Germany final
i like it this match on the snow ... https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xt0obz Quaresma Passing Trivela ...onthe Snow is pretty amazing ..
Go to 25 : 00 minutes at Video Cruyff 2 Opta Assists ...against Nec 1971-1972 1 crossing left foot 1 shorter pass with right foot ..
Responding to your question: I don't think the players from 60s were twice as good as the players from 80s. But this isn't the goal contribution percent that tells me. It only serves to show how dependant the team was on a given player to score or assist. Only this. You are the one who's not addressing to the point I made of various players having different goal contribution percent playing with players of different quality. You gave only an answer of appeal to populism which is a fallacy and doesn't address to the point I made.
HA HA HA HA; this proves how little you know about Maradona. YOU KNOW NOTHING OTHER THAN COPYING AND PASTING FROM YOUR GOOGLE SEARCHES!!! This is a quote from 1928 my man. It was written the El Grafico, regarding what does it mean to be a Pibe who is the modern day Gaucho. And the reason why this 1928 quote is so interesting, its because they basically predicts the coming of a player like Diego almost 50 years before it happened. HOW DID YOU NOT KNOW THAT?? ohh, .that's right, I just read your previous posts. . . I know why
Look, I’m not saying I’ve discovered the absolute truth, but rather that I’m one step closer to the truth, and I can prove it with a very basic reasoning. Let’s start with the premise that Messi is the same player playing for Eibar as he is for Barcelona—in other words, he is just as good a player at Eibar as he is at Barcelona. Let’s consider this as an absolute truth. What would the perfect indicator be? The perfect indicator would be one that can perfectly adapt to the context and tell me how good a player is, regardless of where they play. In other words, if a 'rating' told me that Messi is, for example, a 9.7 while playing for Eibar and a 9.7 while playing for Barcelona, then you would be looking at the perfect indicator because it would perfectly reflect how good the player is purely and independently of their context. What’s my point? My point is that if you looked at the raw G+A numbers for the player, Messi would have double or triple the G+A average at Barcelona compared to Eibar. That means it’s something very far from reflecting reality because that number is almost entirely determined by the context. However, if you use the contribution percentage, it’s true that it will probably be higher at Eibar than at Barcelona, but the difference between the two percentages isn’t as large as the difference between the raw G+A numbers. This means that the contribution percentage is getting closer to adapting to the context, as it gives me two values that are closer to each other. The perfect indicator would be one that shows Messi is the same player whether he’s playing for Eibar or Barcelona.
Antonio rattin : pele Rumenigge: maradona Lineker: maradona Gullit : maradona Daniel pasarella : pele Cannigia : maradona Burruchaga.: maradona Kempes : maradona Sergio goecochea : maradona
No, what you’re saying doesn’t hold up to any serious analysis, and you know it. And I’m speaking in plural terms—the best players of the '80s and '60s—not specifically Maradona vs. Pelé. The players from the '60s double the G+A average of the best players from the '80s, and that doesn’t reflect reality or the players’ abilities at all. You should know this. Here’s an example of players from the '80s and '90s. You can literally see how the team goal average is around 1.7—very similar contexts. You have Van Basten, who was probably the best scorer of his generation, with an average of just 0.473 non-penalty goals at Milan. I repeat, the best scorer in the world of his generation. Players like Puskás more than double the G+A average of Baggio, just to give an example. If you think Puskás was twice the player Baggio was, then you understand nothing.
Puskas 1000x times better than Baggio .. Behaviour in Big Finals .. Puskas : 1, 92 % Baggio : 0, 38 % Michel Platini... Assists are Wrong at all .. ==== 79 Assists PLatini has much more Pre_assists ...than others you are comparing Attackers with the Regista PLatini midfielder ..
For me sounds that you don't view any whole game Of Ferenc Puskas as simple as that . Poor vision at all !
you need to see much more whole Games for sure ... Of other Players also .. taking it Off Messi and Maradona only ..
with Due All respect from you dear mate ....is very very obsessed with Messi and Maradona only please Open Mind always ... and to think twice before to talk about Older Players .. because I saw really so many many whole matches from them in my entire life .
I understand that but still this cannot be used as an indicator that one player is better than another for the reasons I already mentioned. The purpose of this statistic is not to say that one player is better than another. It's about saying how dependent the team was on that player to score or assist. Nothing more, nothing less. A player can have a higher goal contribution percentage than another and still be an inferior player.
But .. How do you evaluate then in a fair way ?? There is no such thing as analyzing players without metrics Defensive Metrics Interceptions Tackles Won Duels Won Defensive Covers Defensive Blocks Def Headers Won Distance Covered Defending Set Pieces Yellow Cards Red Cards Playmaking Metrics Key-Passes Big Chances Created Pre Key-Passes Long Range Balls accuracy % Crossing accuracy % Passing accuracy % Dictates Tempo Atk Headers Won % Pre-Assists Ball Possession Offensive Metrics Goals Assists Shots on Target ratio % Dribbles completed per 90 minutes Attacking Set Pieces Attacking Movements " Underlapping and overlapping movements .. Comparison Methods : OverView Personal or Individual Attributes Statistics Positions and Roles " " versatility " Reports you suggests what to compare Players so ???? https://community.sports-interactive.com/forums/topic/574713-how-to-compare-players-well/
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3uebz6 there's alot Of Assists ..Johan Cruyff ...PuckVanHeel videos ..from USA ..