1960s Pelé > 1980s Diego Maradona 1960s Eusebio > 1980s Marco Van basten 1960s Ferenc Puskas > 1980s Zico 1960s Alfredo Di Stefano = 1980s Michel Platini 1960s Bobby Charlton > 1980s Lothar matthaus 1960s Gianni Rivera > 1980s Ruud Gullit 1960s Jimmy greaves > 1980s Gary linekar 1960s Luis Suarez > 1980s Enzo scifo 1960s Gianluigi Riva > 1980s Rudi Voller 1960s Dragan dzajic > 1980s Paulo Futre 1960s George best > 1980s Bruno Conti 1960s Uwe Seeler > 1980s Paolo Rossi 1960s Denis law > 1980s Kenny dalglish 1960s Garrincha > 1980s John Barnes 1960s Tostao < 1980s Gheorge Hagi 1960s Hamrin > 1980s Pierre Littbarski 1960s Omar sivori > 1980s Karl Heinz Rummenigge
You're not responding because you know I'm right. The magnitude by which the raw G+A number varies is much greater than the magnitude by which the contribution percentage varies. What does this mean? That the percentage changes little, while the raw G+A number changes a lot. What does this show? That the percentage is closer to a hypothetical reality. Why? Because a real and perfect indicator would be one that remains the same regardless of the player’s context. In other words, the perfect indicator would be one that tells me Messi is the same player at Eibar as he is at Barcelona. No statistic can do that perfectly, but the contribution percentage gets closer to achieving it.
Reread and try to respond to what the sentence is asking. I said, 'Do you think it’s realistic or possible that the best players from the 1960s were twice as good as the best players from the 1980s?' TWICE AS GOOD. Do you understand the problem? There could be some players from the '60s who are better than some from the '80s and vice versa—I’m not questioning that. The problem is that 'If you look at the raw G+A numbers, you’d conclude that the players from the 1960s are twice as good as those from the 1980s. Which is very far from being something that represents reality.' 'Obviously, the most logical, reasonable, and probable explanation is that they’re equivalent.' And when you look at the contribution percentages, you realize they are equivalent. The correct answer is that the players from the '80s are equivalent to those from the '60s, meaning I’m closer to the truth.
Twice as good in certain aspects for sure Pelés weaker foot was twice as good as Diego Maradonas His ability to head the ball was twice as good His ability to strike the ball in open play from out the box was twice as good as Diego Maradonas He was a killer in big games in a way that Diego Maradona absolutely never was Pelé was The difference maker not the one who piggy banked off the clutch scoring ability of others The “assisters” in the pre modern era were the silent hero’s (and they should remain silent) There is also no evidence anywhere that when Pelé was in his peak that he struggled for consistency within his absolute peak seasons or that he was outshone by his own teammates over the course of a season. This doesn’t exist anywhere for Pelé It does for Diego Maradona Serie A 1985/86 Serie A 1986/87
Gullit vs Rivera ... Gullit was much better than Gianni Rivera easily ... Gullit was a pure Total Footballer Rivera was more technically brilliant than Gullit But Professional Football has Mental Attributes Physical Attributes Technical Attributes Skills Attributes Tactical Attributes Effectiveness The most complete Player Of All Time.. All these attributes weigh heavily on the scales. Tostão was better than Hagi too
yes All argentinian Players that played with both at the same time they are saying Pelé always Alfredo Di Stefano : Pelé Enrique Omar Sivori : Pelé and Diego Maradona was like me a skillful player but no totally a complete player like Pelé was in All Attributes even Di Stefano and Cruyff surpassing Diego too . Perfumo : Pelé Gatti : Pelé Bochini : Pelé Cesar Menotti : Pelé Maradona as a Player : Pelé etc... etc.etc..
For me 1960s Pelé > 1980s Diego Maradona yes easily Pelé 1960s Eusebio ===== 1980s Marco Van basten Draw 1960s Ferenc Puskas >= 1980s Zico ...Ferenc Puskas abit better ... because Zico had consistency alot without Injuries is like Neymar Jr ..right now abit 1960s Alfredo Di Stefano = 1980s Michel Platini is harder this Fight ... 1960s Bobby Charlton >== 1980s Lothar matthaus Draw Charlton was slightly better than Matthaus ..but Matthaus ..is stronger too 1980s Ruud Gullit > Gianni Rivera ... easily 1960s Jimmy greaves ==== 1980s Gary lineker Draw 1960s Luis Suarez > 1980s Enzo scifo 1960s Gianluigi Riva > 1980s Rudi Voller 1960s Dragan dzajic >= 1980s Paulo Futre 1960s George best >= 1980s Bruno Conti 1960s Uwe Seeler ===== 1980s Paolo Rossi Draw but i prefer Paolo Rossi 1960s Denis law ====== 1980s Kenny dalglish Draw but i prefer Kenny Dalglish 1960s Garrincha >>>>>>>>> 1980s John Barnes 1960s Tostao > 1980s Gheorge Hagi 1980s Pierre Littbarski > Hamrin 60's 1960s Omar sivori >== 1980s Karl Heinz Rummenigge slightly better Sivori ...
What are The main Attributes do you admire most in Diego Maradona's Style to play Football ... For me Corners Crossing Dribbling First Touch Heading Accuracy Long Shots Shot Technique Passing technique Ball control Skills Aggression Bravery Composure Determination Flair Leadership Long Range Balls Curve BodyBalance Agility Acceleration Place Shots and for you ?????
well is your vision about Football .... What you think so Is valid or is not Valid ... well ... it's your Human rights ..is everything alright for me .
yes ... I saw this ...also ... mainly .. 1987-88 season ahead too ... 1988-89... 1989-90 ...1990-91 ... before sometimes he shoots much more stronger .... had more Stamina , Endurance, Natural Power, BodyBalance , Sprint Speed ..Vertical actions and Natural Fitness ....
There i There are video evidences available for maradona's assists for napoli, boca, sevilla and barcelona(nearly all assists) and for argentina.only not available are argentinos juniors assists..but sources claim it's just 40 (opta assists) in a lot of matches(in 167 matches).how many of cruyff's assists exist in videos?
yes is easier to find this Praasen ! Feyenoord 1983-84 are 18 Assists Opta on Eredivisie has the videos on Internet Ajax 1982-83 Ajax 1981-82 PuckvanHeel did it the videos Of Assists from those seasons .. before.. Ajax has Official Reports on the Club Official Site ... 60's 70's there's alot Of Assists .;;
Can you guarantee the credibility of these ratings? No one can.also i suppose they were bit biased towards italian players because they dominated the chart nearly every season.i think they rated diffenders highly too,especially italian ones.