Sorry, ldb. I'm really bitchy today. REALLY bitchy. I think I exhausted all my lovin' voting on that goal.
I doubt there was an offsides on the first goal. Stewart was definitely on because the ball was played from end line (i.e. backwards). Cerritos was likely onsides as well, and I have not heard anybody complaining about that one.
It's rare to see a Quake on the list. San Jose goals have just been ugly all year long. Walker does not deserve last place. His is easily as nice as any other (although all are admitedly less than spectacular).
"Likely"? Either you is or you isn't and I thought he isn't (my only look was in real time, I haven't seen any replays).
http://www.springfieldsoccer.org/soccer_glossary.htm from the link: "Onsides When a player is on Offense and is not offsides" The term "onsides" is an accepted terminology in the game meaning not offsides "moron".
A U-11 Team Website. Good reliable source. There is still no term in soccer called "offsides", or "onsides".
"There is still no term in soccer called "offsides", or "onsides"." Oh I am sorry, I guess you really were sincere when you wanted information about how the game is played.
Maybe you were talking about Jamil being Offside. Then I know what you are talking about. Was Ronald Onside? And don't try to tell me its the same thing. Offsides is what U-11 coaches/webmasters and those uneducated about the game use.