USWNT v Japan in April 2026, pre/pbp/post

Discussion in 'USA Women: News and Analysis' started by lil_one, Jan 26, 2026.

  1. MiLLeNNiuM

    MiLLeNNiuM Member+

    Aug 28, 2016
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I also agree. It's painful to watch at times.
     
  2. chirenzhiren

    chirenzhiren Member

    Dortmund
    United States
    Jul 14, 2021
    The third match struck a good balance between possession and directness in attack. The U.S. moved the ball well while also playing diagonal passes behind Japan’s back line, allowing Sophie and Rose to attack the channels. Sophie showed her strategic value even in the first match, despite not playing especially well, but this game demonstrated how much pressure she can put on an opponent’s back line when she is at her best.

    Another takeaway is that attacking set pieces, corners, free kicks, and even throw-ins, are especially valuable against Japan. Set pieces allow the U.S. to make better use of its advantage in size and physicality. The U.S. scored two goals and created two additional scoring chances from corners tonight. The first goal in the opening match also came from a corner. Even in the loss in Seattle, two corners delivered by Moultrie were dangerous.

    Since attacking set pieces are so important against Japan, a natural question is how to win more of them. To do that, repeated high-speed attacks or elite size and ball-receiving ability are essential. Sophie was outstanding again tonight. In addition to making several dangerous runs, she also produced a few very impressive receptions.

    The tempo slowed somewhat after the third goal was scored, and the substitutes seemed less well integrated than the starters. Still, the match was largely well managed and the victory was well deserved.
     
    TrueCrew, Allende72, dams and 2 others repped this.
  3. soccernutter

    soccernutter Moderator
    Staff Member

    Tottenham Hotspur
    Aug 22, 2001
    Near the mountains.
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Without reading what anybody else has said...

    It was quite a bit different being in the stadium versus having watched the matches on TV for the last year or more.
    I sat opposite of the benches, fairly close down, almost at midfield. Thus, I had the Thompson sisters the first half, and Rodman, Fox, and co the second half.

    First, not sure if this was mentioned on TV or picked up, but it almost seemed that Hutton was assigned to watch, and at time mark, Hasagawa. This was noticeable at time the way that the defense moved almost in positional or even zonal marking, yet Hutton was following Hasagawa. That changed for the second half as Japan changed their formation and fluidity, and Hutton's effectiveness slowly deteriorated as she got tired until her sub.

    It was very clear what G Thompson has to work on - 360 awareness. There were multiple times where she had the ball and could have turned upfield or made a pass outside instead of inside, but didn't even seem to think to look. Defensively, I think she was better and man does she have fight.

    One of the things a couple in the crowd around me commented on was how much better Wilson was compared to the first match. She looked to lively and so willing to take risks. Clearly the rust is still there, but I liked the risks. What was noticeable, to me, is that she is not on the same page with players like Rodman and Lavelle and A Thompson. Multiple times she should have made a pass to an open player or a player making a run that seemed so obvious from where I was sitting. Still, she was so lively and it would have been great to see her get a goal.

    I'm guessing that multiple posters up thread made some comment about how the team passed in the first half. Having watched the match in person, I have a bit of a different perspective seeing the players move and work as a unit to find the open player and try and get Japan off balance. What was notable to me was that Japan was fairly rigid in formation for the first half, and that made it difficult to find that final ball. Yes, they could have been more inventive, but there was also a lot of probing going on (runs being tested).

    Additionally, in the first half one of the things that was missed, at least from what I saw on my side, was the ball not getting switched to the Thompson sisters. Both were wide open at times, individually, and a ball across or through would have set them free. Alyssa even called for the ball a few times, but nothing came of it.

    Girma's goal seemed to make the difference in the match. Japan had to go on the attack, and I'm not sure if this was already their doing or caused by the goal, but they became much more fluid with player movement. To that end, it allowed Hasagawa to become detached from Hutton, and it fell to Heaps to pick her up (and Coffey when she came on). But that fluidity also presented more possibilities for us and thus came more inventiveness. The throughball to Lavelle that led to her goal would not have happened in the first half.

    And the Wesley for Davidson sub. Man, the difference in passing was to very clear. Davidson has to be the starter with Girma, if for nothing else other than her passing. But her defending is also stellar.

    The funnest part of the match, for me, was what Girma was subbed off. Don't know if it was caught on TV, but the wave had already made 3 or 4 rounds. The Girma subbed off (right in front of us on our side), and she walked/jogged around and as she passed the crowd, that group would get up and cheer. It was like she was creating her own wave. It was great.
     
    MiLLeNNiuM, cpthomas, taosjohn and 7 others repped this.
  4. soccernutter

    soccernutter Moderator
    Staff Member

    Tottenham Hotspur
    Aug 22, 2001
    Near the mountains.
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Not sure what you saw, but the field was fine. The ball, though, sounded a bit flat.

    Her total play, from runs to passes to general decision making just exuded confidence and awareness.

    As we were watching, even from our angle which was near perfect, we were all holding our breaths waiting for the ball to go wide. :ROFLMAO:

    Really like that we got 2 goals off corners. And that is 3 off set pieces.
     
    taosjohn and Allende72 repped this.
  5. soccernutter

    soccernutter Moderator
    Staff Member

    Tottenham Hotspur
    Aug 22, 2001
    Near the mountains.
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Is that true?

    Bugg is with the U20s, and I suspect will stay with them through the U20 World Cup.
     
    TrueCrew and Allende72 repped this.
  6. soccernutter

    soccernutter Moderator
    Staff Member

    Tottenham Hotspur
    Aug 22, 2001
    Near the mountains.
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Correction: it was a Coffey free kick, not a corner.
     
    chirenzhiren and taosjohn repped this.
  7. soccernutter

    soccernutter Moderator
    Staff Member

    Tottenham Hotspur
    Aug 22, 2001
    Near the mountains.
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Hayes post match. It's short for her (little more than 9 minutes).

     
    TrueCrew repped this.
  8. hotjam2

    hotjam2 Member+

    Nov 23, 2012
    Club:
    Real Madrid
    Slow start cuz ever the control freak, Emma Hayes, wanted it that way—-she felt like a little more passing at the start of the game will give them the confidence later on to become more team coordinated….and it worked! Of course kinda helped that Japanese played like they were frozen statues! Got to be their worst performance in quite a long time(maybe all the way back to the 2015 WC final)

    question for everyone; surely everybody’s got to know the Thompson Twins are not twins? So is this their new moniker name ala Triple Espresso?

    Odd thing both are somehow musical deprived. Obviously Thompson Twins came from that awful sounding 80’s techno pop group/TP from Sabrina Carpenter’s mediocre but big #1 hit(Espresso)
     
  9. abecedarian

    abecedarian Member+

    Mar 25, 2009
    SSSomerville
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Sure, we know that. We just like to show our age (sob!)
     
    TrueCrew and Allende72 repped this.
  10. MiLLeNNiuM

    MiLLeNNiuM Member+

    Aug 28, 2016
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I saw 2 players get concussed when they hit the ground.
    Also, in the post-match interview, someone was talking about how hard the ground was.

    Rose is one of the more dependable strikers on the team.
     
    TrueCrew and Allende72 repped this.
  11. psnotyours

    psnotyours Member

    Bvb
    United States
    Mar 8, 2023
    That midfield was good. I think that should be the midfield going forward.
     
    soccernutter repped this.
  12. TrueCrew

    TrueCrew Member+

    Dec 22, 2003
    Columbus, OH
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    We a surely in a +1 situation at some positions already, IMHO. Kinda like in 2019 in CM imwith Ertz, Mewis, Lavelle, and Heaps in CM. We could just rotate them throughout the tourney, keep them fresh, and still have 3 world class players out there at all times.

    IDK if it is quite at that level yet, but Coffey, Hutton, Heaps, and Lavelle all all seriously cooking in CM right now. Add to the fact that Shaw, Moultrie, snd Cat could play CAM and Sonnett DM, and Shrader isn't even called in, and our CM/CAM depth is just off the charts. Plus Jackson is coming and Sentnor can CAM some. And Yohannes.

    Swanson & Cat back will give us 4 world class forwards/wide attackers. Plus A. Thompson and all the other youngsters: Sears, Cooper, etc. Alyssa did not shine as much with Japan sitting back so much, but she has taken real steps forward this year at Chelsea. Wilson + Cat in the middle & Swanson, Rodman, and Thompson wide. Again, that is a +1 at both forward spots and we have not even gotten to Shaw, Sears, Cooper, Moultrie, & Sentnor who are all still developing as well.

    The front six is loaded both with established players & developing youngsters. Vets like Lavelle & Heaps still playing at a high level. Prime age players who a either returning to form and/or still growing as players: Swanson, Wilson, Rodman, Coffey, and Macario. And younger players who improving right in front of our eyes: Hutton, A. Thompson, Shaw, Moultrie, Yohannes, Sears, Cooper, Sentnor.

    There is still a ways to go for some. Both in terms of recovery, reintegration, and development, but wow, do things look bright at the moment for the front six.

    And I gotta say, things are looking brighter at the back as well.

    Davidson's return gives us a +1 at CB with Girma & Sonnett. 3 established, proven players. Girma can play either CB side, Davidson CB/LB, and Sonnett all over the place. CB's don't typically rotate much in tourney's, but we certainly can if we want. Wesley's fine showing, along with Bugg, seem like the top contenders for the 4th/5th spots. Sams, and the still new to the CB spot Rudd can also contribute, and Reale can play some LB/CB too.

    FB beyond Fox has been an issue with Dunn retiring, Nighswonger fading, and Krueger aging out. But Gisele Thompson is making big leaps right before our eyes and can play both sides. Patterson as well, on both counts. Reale had a tough window but still shows a lot of promise and has LB/CB versatility. I am not as bullish on FB as I am at CM, F, and CB, but I am feeling a whole lot better about it than I was 2 weeks ago.

    Ditto GK. PTJ was shaky, but Dickey has been excellent. And I feel pretty good about McGlynn and Campbell's resurgence. I know Emma wants to develop 2 GKs, as any coach should. But I think there is less question every day about whom the #1 is. For the first time since Naeher retired, I feel like we have our #1.

    And, of course, Hayes is obviously one of the top coaches in the world.

    I feel REALLY good about the trajectory this team is on. Best since 2019.
     
  13. TrueCrew

    TrueCrew Member+

    Dec 22, 2003
    Columbus, OH
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Yes, I am aware they are sisters but not twins.

    I rise in defense of the Thompson Twins:

     
  14. hotjam2

    hotjam2 Member+

    Nov 23, 2012
    Club:
    Real Madrid
    80’s was all about style over substance(basically how good you looked in video). Sure killed Billy Squier’s career
     
  15. soccernutter

    soccernutter Moderator
    Staff Member

    Tottenham Hotspur
    Aug 22, 2001
    Near the mountains.
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Interesting. It looked fine both visually and the way the players ran around on it. Might not have been frozen, but certainly could have been not lush (so to speak).
     
  16. soccernutter

    soccernutter Moderator
    Staff Member

    Tottenham Hotspur
    Aug 22, 2001
    Near the mountains.
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I think it will depend on who we play. What I would say is that Lavelle is very likely the #1 as an AM. Heaps and Coffey looked to pair well, but Hutton is superior in defense to either of them. In the Coffey and Heaps v. Hutton comparison, both are better offensively. Heaps has a height advantage over Coffey, and is more technical, but Coffey is faster and a better box to box midfielder.

    So, I would say this for the staring midfield.
    Versus Japan: Lavelle, Heaps, and Hutton (size)
    Versus Spain: Lavelle, Coffey, Hutton (technical/speed)
    Versus England: Lavelle, Coffey, Heaps (size)
    Versus Brasil: Lavelle, Coffey, Hutton (technical) - I think Brasil might be too quick for Heaps, though she might be able to slot in for Coffey.
    Versus France: Lavelle, Coffey, Hutton (speed)
    Versus Germany: Lavelle, Coffey, Heaps (size)

    To be clear, when I'm talking about "size," I think Heaps size versus Hutton is an advantage. That will change in a couple of years, maybe sooner.
     
    TrueCrew, Allende72 and psnotyours repped this.
  17. soccernutter

    soccernutter Moderator
    Staff Member

    Tottenham Hotspur
    Aug 22, 2001
    Near the mountains.
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    And that is currently. There quite a few coming up the potential to force their way in.

    Something I think might have been overlooked is how well Risa did v. A Thompson. Risa is very quick, and it is not very often somebody is able to stay with A Thompson. But what seemed clear as the match went on and as Wilson made a bigger impact, is that it opened up space for A Thompson to cut across. It was her work that set up Hutton's shot off the bar, but was able to happen because Wilson made a cutting run opening up space for A Thompson. Yeah, A Thompson should have done better, and needs to v. a top opponent like Japan, but with Wilson's speed, that will open up a lot of space.

    I don't think I can really explain how impressed I was with Hutton. One of the things I payed attention to in the match I watched in-person was how Hasagawa would do. The little she had the ball, she showed how good she is. But I think a lot of the credit to her lack of impact on match was due to Hutton's defending. And not just the one v one, but the shadowing and at times marking. For almost the entire time until Heaps was subbed off, Hutton was focused on Hasagawa. It looked like when Coffey came on for Heaps, she was assigned to Hasagawa, and did not do as well.
     
    TrueCrew and taosjohn repped this.
  18. taosjohn

    taosjohn Member+

    Dec 23, 2004
    taos,nm
    To this former handegg player, that seemed clear right through the tv. the ball was deader than we like, particularly in the first half. The sun coming out seemed to warm it up a bit in the second, but still only from pine to balsa...

    Plus there seemed to be one really slick spot on the field; people from both teams kept falling in it even when not engaged at all.
     
    soccernutter repped this.
  19. GoodHands

    GoodHands Member+

    AC Milan
    United States
    Jul 17, 2024
    I believe that the pitch was not frozen on the surface but I also think it was an inch or two down and, because of the way it was laid, it was very unlikely to thaw in time for the match. It was not natural grass laid like a lawn but it was natural grass, mostly, laid like artificial turf.

    The only time, as far as I know, that i was badly concussed was on a landing much like we saw in the match BUT the protocols were much different than today and I played, according to my teammates and coach, an additional 30 minutes when I was subbed but I remember nothing about the match after my injury and I remember just a few flashes from the match or the post game. I woke up the next morning with a horrible headache and nausea and I really did not feel right until about three days later.

    Concussions are actually very dangerous and I think I was lucky that no other serious symptoms appeared.

    Hard pitches for any reason are very dangerous and cold hard pitches even more so.

    I like the new concussion protocols but I would like to see one change and that is if a player is injured on the field they should be stretchered off ASAP and treated on the sideline and the match should continue. The injury delays are totally out of hand and the refs never add enough time.
    I am not saying that injured players should be dragged off the field as soon as the injury happens but the first person to an injured player should be tasked with evaluating the safety of removal. About 95% of soccer injuries are not even near serious enough to prevent stretchering off the filed.

    Does anyone know if the temporary sub rule that was discussed when the concussion protocols were implemented were actually tried anywhere? That seems to be a solution for some of the excessive delays.

    The one thing I know is that heads do not really bounce safely and a hard pitch makes that fact worse.
     
    soccernutter repped this.
  20. cpthomas

    cpthomas BigSoccer Supporter

    Portland Thorns
    United States
    Jan 10, 2008
    Portland, Oregon
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Not commented on yet, it was great that Emma put in all the subs at the end of the game, and they kept Japan scoreless. I'm sure some of them were bummed after the second game loss, and being put in at the end and holding Japan scoreless gives then a confidence boost and lets them put the loss behind them. Very smart coaching.
     
    MiLLeNNiuM, soccernutter and GoodHands repped this.
  21. hotjam2

    hotjam2 Member+

    Nov 23, 2012
    Club:
    Real Madrid
    USA made an impressive statement with it’s dominance over the much lauded Japanese, making them defensively one of the favorites for next year’s WC

    Quick check on how the other contenders doing ; Brazil won a mini tournament at home where they beat Canada 1-0 in the final. Brazil was the better team from highlights I’ve seen but still remains unrefined as they gave up a red & several dangerous positioned free kicks late in the game. What gets me is so many of Brazil’s bigger names were missing from this squad, so don’t know if they’ve been permanently retired or their coach just trying out newbies

    Spain maybe feeling down after loosing at Wembley, I think though they got to stop taking a siesta at the beginning of an match as well try a bit more players that aren’t part of the Barca mindset(on occasion Spain’s been known to start an entire lineup of current & former Barca players)

    England riding high on their two wins giving them a three point lead in WC group qualifiers. They arguably got the best starting eleven in the business (considering the US still trying figure out who’s our main #9 is). Question is just how deep England is, but that might have been answered that they just won the Euro U23 championship….And get this; their fans were hyping up an 17 year named Chloe Sawie as the 2nd coming of Harry Kane(yeah English fans are funny like that, you got to measure up to men players, lol)

    These four squads(US, EN, SP, BR) would be right now the front runners for next year’s WC
     
  22. MiLLeNNiuM

    MiLLeNNiuM Member+

    Aug 28, 2016
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I' not gonna hold anything against Japan's results after these 3 matches. They are still a top 5 team in my book.

    As Lechus pointed out earlier in this thread...
     
    soccernutter and taosjohn repped this.
  23. soccernutter

    soccernutter Moderator
    Staff Member

    Tottenham Hotspur
    Aug 22, 2001
    Near the mountains.
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I think what these series of matches did was show how much better the US is than expected. Saying that, I also am also taking this with a grain of salt considering what @Lechus7 said.

    Not going to read too much into this mini-tournament, even if bigger names were missing. They are still quite good, and they will be playing at home, but I don't think they are at the same level as the US, SPA, ENG, and Japan even with their full team. I also think it is worth noting that Japan called up 7 players who would qualify for an U23 tournament this year. And one of them, Koga, who is only 20, has been very impressive at Tottehman.

    Not just England who do this. But, in my experience, the fans who tend to follow WoSo have almost stopped doing this entirely. It's the more casual fans that seem to make the comparison to the men's game.

    Japan are just so good technically, and Hayes has said they are the best defending team in the world, so I'm not counting them out. As I said above, I think the top 4 (right now) are the US, SPA, ENG, and Japan (in no particular order) with Brasil in 5th. Germany and France are also in with a shout, but I don't think they are quite at the same level.
     
    MiLLeNNiuM and Allende72 repped this.
  24. Number007

    Number007 Member+

    Santos FC
    Brazil
    Aug 29, 2018
    Playing home games is a massive advantage. I read very little into friendlies. Who is fit come tourney time will be a much bigger factor than these games
     
  25. soccernutter

    soccernutter Moderator
    Staff Member

    Tottenham Hotspur
    Aug 22, 2001
    Near the mountains.
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Yes and no. The US v. Japan serious was a way for the US to get players who have been out for some lesser or greater duration (Wilson, Rodman, Davidson) to integrate into a team that has changed pretty dramatically since the 2024 Olys, and 2025 SBC. It also is a way to judge progress of players as well, in the case of the US that being G Thompson and Hutton, both of whom showed very well. I don't know the Brasil situation, but it could be that this is a chance for them to bring in inexperienced players to see who is up to standard. While the results might be less significant, the results still matter.
     

Share This Page