Having posted the stuff about ratings, here's what I wonder about the tactics and matchups: what's happened to that defensive hole that supposedly exists in the US defensive midfield and does Japan have the players to do something about it? We all (it seems) believe France could do something about it, but France didn't make it to the semifinals. Many, coming into the World Cup, probably thought Maroszan could do something about it, even in the absence of Kessler, but Maroszan was hobbled - a big blow for Germany. Aya Miyama is a terrific midfielder but Coach Sasaki has been deploying her out wider, on the left side. In the knockout rounds, he's brought back Kawasumi to the right side, where Seattle Reign and NWSL fans are quite familiar with how effective she is. But against the US, does Sasaki move Miyama more centrally? Or someone else? Or do they somehow manage it more subtly - picking their spots to play in towards the middle in front of the US defensive line? And what did Australia do against the US? They looked as good as anybody against the US for a long stretch of the game. How did they manage that and is that something Japan can learn from? Otherwise, I think the game favors the US. The artificial turf, ironically enough, for all the US complaints about it led by Wambach, favors the US. The artificial turf, combined with the US athletic ability to press and close down on opponents will make it hard for Japan to play their possession style of game to good effect - although apparently the field at Vancouver is better than that at Edmonton where Japan struggled against a similar, hard-tackling England team.
Just like I said before the start of the tournament - any other outcome than USA winning would be a massive surprise, at least in my eyes. Anyway, before the final I have just three wishes: - no penalties please (unless we make it all the way through the shootout, which is highly unlikely) - if the USA wins, please do it fair and square so we can praise the players not the refs (yeah, it's a 1999 reference to some extent, although I'm fully aware poor refereeing is not players' fault) - Golden Ball for Carli Lloyd, it's her time and nobody deserves it more
Agreed. This is really a win/win for me. It has my vote for goal of the tournament For all warnings being made, this has not been the style of the US attack because that is now how the US plays. So I don't expect this to be a tactic. She has been inconsistent, but when she needs to score, she does. The way Japan play, the US will need somebody who had better movement than Abby.
Btw, Rapinoe 's birthday is today. I have a feeling about this and remember, it's about feelings, and nothing more than.
2015/07/05 Sun: Ch52.USA - Japan USA (Jillian Ellis): Identical people, but ... 4-4-2 10© Carli Lloyd, 13 Alex Morgan 15 Megan Rapinoe, 14 Morgan Brian, 12 Lauren Holiday, 17 Tobin Heath 22 Meghan Klingenberg, 19 Julie Johnston, 4 Becky Sauerbrunn, 11 Ali Krieger 1 Hope Solo Japan (Norio Sasaki): Identical (for the 3rd match in a row). 17 Yuki Ogimi, 11 Shinobu Ohno 8© Aya Miyama, 13 Rumi Utsugi, 6 Mizuho Sakaguchi, 9 Nahomi Kawasumi 5 Aya Sameshima, 4 Saki Kumagai, 3 Azusa Iwashimizu, 19 Saori Ariyoshi 18 Ayumi Kaihori
Great if you're a US supporter but not a very compelling Final. Actually, this tournament hasn't really had great games since the quarter finals. The Germany-France game might turn out to be the high point (for the neutral observer, just wanting to see good games). Lots of entertaining games early on but kind of fizzled out.