Trump Presidency X-like American History X, but without the laughs

Can someone explain the SC system to me in terms of the original thinking/foundation?

I must admit, I dont get why it has so much political leaning and bias in a court system.

Especially one with lifetime appointments and being involved in legal decisions around political issues.

Did the founders not see the potential issues with this setup on conception?

(Asking as a non US citizen here)

 

So she got one of those no-show jobs like Mr. Blonde got in Resevoir Dogs.

 

I need a gig like that.

 

It's like being paid a massive salary to be a BS poster.

Post what you want, with no requirement to be accurate or to ever be put in front of live humans to defend your views.

 

You find out a way to monetize this, we can go on Shark Tank.

 

Then she says; “I get a massive amount of responses from my comments.” I am relevant.

 

The founders were very idyllic in there thinking. The theory was that by making the judicial appointments lifetime appointments, the judges/justices would be free to make decisions without fear of political consequences and, as a result, would be more guided by law. Unfortunately they didn't account for people appointing political hacks to be judges/justices. This isn't a new thing, btw.

 

I think the founders didn't anticipate that people would live so long. The idea of an independent judiciary is laughable now.

 

They must have anticipated, "Hey I will help you achieve your dream of being on the Supreme Court and fight your way through a sexual-assault charge, but in return you owe me." However, their solution is not immediately apparent.

 

I'd venture to say that lifetime appointments are horrible but maybe you want them to serve longer than two senate terms, so the effects of their decision is weighed by the people that elect them.



hahahahahahaha....



I make myself laugh sometimes...

 

Are you blonde
Did you work for Fox
Did you call Covid-19 a demo fake.

if you reply yes to all three there’s a chance.

 

Maybe someone posted it here but Diamond & Silk were pro BLM at one point. Didn't get them anywhere so they became Trumpers in 2015.

 

From reading the article,she self-quarantined.That's basically the same as burning the flag ,amirite,boys?

 

Yeah but that was before the virus hit.

 

I'm not surprised. But I don't think even the most delusional conservative would point to them as a sign of diversity...

 

Oh they do. Because there’s not a lot of diversity to be found in the party. Especially on a pop culture level.

 

What do you mean by “not a lot of diversity “?

 

They're technically right since their last names are all Black

 

Oh dear

Diamond and Silk are being paid all that money by the GOP and RWNJ media but are still wearing those Tyler Perry wigs? pic.twitter.com/vmusArq66w

— 🤗 Tiff ✨1/15✨ (@ayotiff) March 31, 2020

 

So that's why they thought he was in league with You-Know-Who?

 

She's Super Trumpy

On the same day Larry Kudlow said coronavirus was “contained” on Feb. 25th, Trump’s campaign spox made an even more bold claim.

“We will not see diseases like the coronavirus come here..and isn't it refreshing when contrasting it with the awful presidency of President Obama." pic.twitter.com/O0DDH3Rvkw

— Andy Kaczynski (@KFILE) April 4, 2020

 

Be curious to know the % of Fox Blondes who are now Fox Brunettes. Someone good at photoshop could fix this