Thornton to DCU?

Discussion in 'Chicago Fire' started by ursula, Oct 30, 2004.

  1. ursula

    ursula Member

    Feb 21, 1999
    Republic of Cascadia
    Yeah I know it's a vile dirtbag of a paper but the Washington Times has speculation on one of your thousands of GK's- the Maryland native one- ging to DCU with Rimando going to C-USA. Doesn't say what the Fire will get in compensation though. Just thought you'd like to know.

    http://washingtontimes.com/sports/20041029-114755-2844r.htm
     
  2. Fanaddict

    Fanaddict Member+

    Mar 9, 2000
    streamwood IL USA
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    It has been rumored the Fire would deal Thornton to DC since they got him back months ago.
     
  3. DrBobC

    DrBobC Member

    Feb 28, 2004
    Burton upon Trent
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'll trade him for peter nowak
     
  4. Greddy

    Greddy Member

    Jun 24, 2003
    Chicago
    Club:
    FC Barcelona
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'd rather have Zach starting for us next year. Since that clearly isn't going to happen, I'd settle for Dema.
     
  5. IJS

    IJS Member

    Mar 28, 2000
    Naperville
    Club:
    Yeovil Town FC
    Nat'l Team:
    England
    Hmmmm Dema in goal next season, very interesting idea :D
     
  6. ManiacalClown

    ManiacalClown Member+

    Jun 27, 2003
    Greater Pittsburgh
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    We need Dema like we need the hanta virus
     
  7. redzin

    redzin New Member

    Jan 6, 2000
    I like this line of thinking.

    I don't see it happening, but I really think Zach should be back in our net next year. Nothing against Ring but it just didn't look right.
     
  8. ursula

    ursula Member

    Feb 21, 1999
    Republic of Cascadia
    We all know that this is wild speculation, but it's interesting that you folks are concluding that you would be getting something from DC. To me it looks more like a three-way "trade". You know: Thornton to DC, Rimando to C-USA, something from C-USA to Chicago. What is that something? An allocation? Chicago directs C-USA to pick a specific player?

    Of course it could be a pair of separate trades involving DCU. Just something to add to the rumor mill.
     
  9. Greddy

    Greddy Member

    Jun 24, 2003
    Chicago
    Club:
    FC Barcelona
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Well, from me at least, it's more wishful thinking that we'll be getting something from you guys. It could be a three way trade. It could be two heads up trades. It could be C-USA takes Zach in the expansion draft, and then trades him to you for Rimando.
     
  10. JeffGMc

    JeffGMc Member

    Oct 14, 2000
    New York City
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    But we already have THREE allocations to use yet, what're we going to do with a fourth? Getting Dema back would be the better deal is possible.
     
  11. theburden

    theburden Member

    Jul 11, 2002
    MDSC head brewer
    Somehow I don't think that having too many allocations is something Peter is worried about.
     
  12. Chicago1871

    Chicago1871 Member

    Apr 21, 2001
    Chicago
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Zach for Gros and a 2nd round draft pick.
     
  13. xkimo_fire

    xkimo_fire New Member

    Jul 9, 2004
    Iowa
    I'd take a healthy Santino and a pick
     
  14. onefineesq

    onefineesq Member+

    Sep 16, 2003
    Laurel, MD
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahaha
     
  15. Old Man!

    Old Man! BigSoccer Supporter

    RIP Chicago Fire
    Mar 11, 2000
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Can we get Thomas Rongen from C-USA to be our assistant coach? He and Sarachan already have guided teams to championships and then losing seasons back to back. Perhaps the two of them together would amount to a championship?:)
     
  16. Greddy

    Greddy Member

    Jun 24, 2003
    Chicago
    Club:
    FC Barcelona
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Or one Dallas Burn of a season
     
  17. FFan

    FFan New Member

    Oct 27, 1999
    Naperville, IL
    If we let Thornton go it would be another idiotic decision that plagued this club in 2004. Problem is this one might actually heavily weight in on our performance in 2005.

    Keep Thornton and get rid of Ring. Do you think Ring would be ever considered for national team job? I think it is as good of an indication as any on a team of 4 or 5 national team players and known for generating national team caliber players that we need more experienced and complete player. Ring is a good player for the A-league, Dallas, or expansion team but not Fire. We need a team leader and someone with enough experience who can actually help our defensive players be better and play as a unit.

    In a nutshell, why would you give up on a player that contributed to this team in all seasons since club's existence and did a wonderful job? Did he loose a job because he wanted to move on (can't blame him) and now it is Ring's time? Well, I want a keeper that actually won a starting spot instead of having it handed to him.

    Even if we let outstanding keeper go to DC who do we get in return? I would think it should be Nowak or Eskedarian but we don't need him with Razov, Ralph, and Herron already here, and I don't think DC would let Nowak go now.

    Moreover, why would DC want Thornton so badly? They do have a good keeper already in Rimando. Is it because Nowak actually knows that Thornton is one of the best goalkeepers in MLS? :rolleyes:
     
  18. djaeb2000

    djaeb2000 Member

    Jun 6, 2000
    ~~~Arsonists~~~
    Club:
    AFC Ajax
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands
    I like the Dema idea a lot. His "FIRE" would help our team tremendously, it just seemed this whole season nobody cared about the games. They all just showed up and got a paycheck, then went home.
    His leadership would help us in the middle a lot next year if we could swing this deal.

    Chivas takes Rimando in EXP draft.

    DC trades Dema and a 3rd Pick to FIRE.

    Fire trades Thornton to DC.


    I'd say this is a good deal for us. It would be better if we could trade Ring to DC instead of Zach.
     
  19. ursula

    ursula Member

    Feb 21, 1999
    Republic of Cascadia

    Deals like this or the above deals like Thornton for Gros and a pick or Esky or Quaranta and a pick are just plain silly. the fact is you have three good GK's and you will-guaranteed-expose at least one of them in the draft. The rumors make that out to be Thornton. Thus, neither DCU nor any other team will trade squat for him knowing that they can pick him up for virtually free. For example, here's a scenerio:

    Fire exposes Thornton. C-USA picks him then deals him to DCU for Rimando. To me the least plausible thing about this is why DCU wants to trade Rimando for Thornton, not that you guys get nothing.

    It would be interesting to see which 12 guys you think the Fire will protect and who gets exposed. Considering that the developmental players are out of this equation (Boucicaut, Capano, Clanton, Griffin, Pickens- I think that probably Jaqua and maybe Countess lose their P-40 status) I see you protecting maybe:

    Armas
    CJ Brown
    Curtin
    Gray
    Herron
    Jaqua
    Marsch
    Pause
    Ralph
    Razov
    Whitfield
    Williams

    leaving these guys exposed:

    Thornton
    Ibrahim
    Buete
    Dipsy
    Perez

    Then you have two more GK's, Ring and Countess. Maybe Countess stays P-40, we'll see. That leaves Ring either exposed or taking the place of someone else on the protected list. Doubtless you guys can make a better list than me, but the point I'm trying to make is that you will be leaving someone exposed who you'd rather not. Thornton seems fairly obvious, hence the rumors.
     
  20. theburden

    theburden Member

    Jul 11, 2002
    MDSC head brewer
    Just don't let this guy know we only have three goalkeepers, You might hurt his feelings.

    [​IMG]
     
  21. Fanaddict

    Fanaddict Member+

    Mar 9, 2000
    streamwood IL USA
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    If they protect whitfield or williams I will strangle dave and peter.Even marsch is now too old and injury prone to protect.
     
  22. theburden

    theburden Member

    Jul 11, 2002
    MDSC head brewer
    Yes, by all means lets make sure Jesse isn't protected. Lord knows how well we did w/o him this year.
     
  23. djaeb2000

    djaeb2000 Member

    Jun 6, 2000
    ~~~Arsonists~~~
    Club:
    AFC Ajax
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands
    I sense the sarcasm here.

    I'll be the first to admit that I hate(d) Jesse Marsch, but I realized as the season went on that we needed him.

    Chivas only want's spanish speaking players? Who's there coach....LOL
     
  24. Fanaddict

    Fanaddict Member+

    Mar 9, 2000
    streamwood IL USA
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    He does seem to fire up the team somewhat (no pun intended) but how many goals or assists did he have? He is now too old to expect him not to miss games because of injury. I like jesse but he is not the greatest player in MLS. Did we win the final game of the year with him in there?We started winning when we got Herron and mapp played well, it just happened that was the time jesse came back.You protect the guys you think will be taken. Chivas isn't going to take him, he isn't latino and salt lake isn't going to want an older player who was hurt most of last year and who makes too much money when you can get a younger player cheaper.
     
  25. theburden

    theburden Member

    Jul 11, 2002
    MDSC head brewer
    You honestly think Steve Pastorino wouldn't jump at the chance to take Jesse Marsch? You are an idiot. In 8 proffesional seasons Jesse has scored a total of 66 combined points from goals and assists. That's about 8 whopping points a season on average. If you are looking to Jesse for offensive production you are looking in the wrong place and will probably always be. Remember how surprised even Jesse was when he scored those two goals late in the season in year two of Naperville? Jesse isn't on the team to score. He is there to control the midfield and break up other team's offense.
     

Share This Page