In perhaps another example of liberal fury , we have this article: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/21/arts/television/21REAG.html So my question is, "Is this an example of young liberal fury or the same-old liberal historical revisionism?" My guess is that this show will be to the Reagan presidency what M*A*S*H* was to the Korean war.
I tried to see the article, but I cancelled my subscription to The Times. Bill O'Reilly appeared to me in a dream and told me to. He also told me to buy his new book. When I woke up, there were twelve hundred copies outside my door, and my credit card company had repossessed my car.
> You comment on articles you haven't read, and > TV movies you haven't seen. Actually watching the movie or reading the article would create a bias. Not reading them is the only way to be objective. But you liberals blinded by your seething rage can't see that.
If Amy Fisher, Mary LeTourneau and that movie the other week about Bush riding Air Force One into Washington to vow revenge on 9/11 have taught us anything, it's that no one pays any attention to TV movies. "Roots" was the exception that proves the rule.
What articles haven't I read? This article was a two page NY Times article which included direct quotes from the script. I read the Adu posts from you and thought you were a fairly serious person. Perhaps I was wrong.