Well now we have the Championship, League One and League Two everything is set up for pro/rel to begin eh? What are we waiting for? Next step, USL could introduce promotion and relegation places without actually promoting or relegating anyone. Baby steps.
I've just realised that I haven't expressed this since the announcement: The EFL names are bloody stupid and it makes me facepalm with a force that would do Muhammad Ali proud, that a US league has adopted them.
Right?!?! They are a historical anomaly as to why they exist in England. JUST TRANSLATE THE BLOODY FRENCH OR ITALIAN SYSTEMS! USL(eague) One/A USL(eague) Two/B USL(eague) Three/C Simple. Obvious. Why are people lauding this as a positive development?! I realize this is probably intended simply to obfuscate the fact that D3 is two notches below MLS and PDL isn't even on the same map (#PathToPro, y'all!), but that should only appeal to the unwashed masses.
I am standing and loudly applauding this post, tears streaming down my face. Is there an emoji for that?
Sigh. You mean the target audience of spectator sports. Did you read Peter Wilt's recent article in the Athletic about promoting a new semi-pro team in Madison? It was all about involving your audiences - and he hinted that those audiences pretty overwhelmingly wanted a phony "Euro FC" kinda name. Cue that facepalm haymaker.
And of course, England used to use Divisions 1-4. That only changed when the Premier League broke away, leaving the FL with three divisions. I'm not even sure what motivated them to start calling the second tier "the Championship". It feels like an unnecessary and unsuccessful attempt to lend added gravitas to their highest tier.
Ah yes. Another pet peeve. The griping over team names. It is virtually impossible to select a name for a US soccer team that will satisfy everyone. Except perhaps, the Rochester Raging Rhinos and Club Internacional De Futbol Miami. Those are both awesome. Sadly Rochester dropped the "Raging" and everyone is just going to refer to the Miami team as "Inter Miami".
I don't really care about names except in cases (as I have already documented) where WORDZZZ R INTENTIONALLY MISSPELLED TO KONNEKT WIF DA YOUF or whatever and/or "silly" minor league names if the team intends to be taken seriously. This one is a little more nuanced, for example: Acceptable names: Savannah Bananas Macon Bacon Hartford Yard Goats Binghamton Rumble Ponies These are all AA or lower teams that have no pretense (nor ability) to achieve a higher station in their sport. Unacceptable team names: San Diego Sockers Laredo Honey Badgers Florida Everblades Everett Aquasox I hope I don't really need to explain this. Thank you for attending my TED Talk.
I'm actually fine with the phony Euro FC names. I mean, whatever! Madison A(F/S)C. It makes sense, says where they're from and allows the supporters to actually nickname the team whatever makes sense over time (the Reds! The Madmen! Dem Bums!). What doesn't make sense to me is trying to pass off being a semi-pro affiliate of MNUTD as "League One" as if it should be the top of the pile of anything.
Now I'm thinking about it, are there any truly great European football club names? Most seem pretty formal and descriptive.
Those are, indeed, stirringly beautiful. I just find FC nearly as annoying/phony/pretentious as those "Championship" and League One type misnomers.
I think the Scottish PFL has the market cornered for good team names: Airdrieonians Celtic F.C. Hamilton Academical Heart of Midlothian Hibernian Inverness Caledonian Thistle Partick Thistle Queen of the South Rangers
N.b. these lists are to be used as examples and should not be considered comprehensive. It's clear, however, that you understand the criteria and are capable of providing acceptable contributions.
And they aren't even particularly historical. Why haven't they stuck with league 2? Calling the third level One is idiotic.
Yeah, but in Canada, it is. kind of. I mean, the actual premier clubs are in MLS, but their tippy-top league is this one, right? Still, I'd prefer League 1 for the first league. Maybe something like League 2 for the second, and get all crazy with League 3 for the third. I used to play in a mutli-tiered league that tried to get around simplicity by using beer brands to confer status. The problem was that nobody could really agree. Is Guiness better than Pauli? Is Bud really not the lowest league? Is there an actual difference in quality between that and the MHLL?
Great Yarmouth Town (the crest on the right of my avatar) play in the Thurlow Nunn Eastern Counties Premier League, which is 9th tier. The Alliance Premier League was the former name of the top "non-league". The word "Premier" has been slapped onto entities almost as prolifically and superficially as the word "Trump".
How dare you besmirch the names of the Ohio Xoggz and the Utah Blitzzzzz. I have a spreadsheet of USL/USISL team names in front of me. The best: Connecticut Wolves Cape Cod Crusaders Vermont Wanderers (alas, aka Voltage) Long Island Rough Riders Wilmington Hammerheads (sentimental reasons) Charleston Battery Lexington Bluegrass Bandits New Orleans Riverboat Gamblers The worst: Orange County Zodiac (later the slightly more acceptable waves, then the simply bizarre Blue Star) Montreal Impact (or l'Impact de Montreal) Syracuse Salty Dogs Atlanta Datagraphic Magic (I actually remember when Datagraphic was a famed regional amateur club, but still ...) Austin Sockadillos (ouch -- later the Lone Stars) California Victory Las Vegas Quicksilver