I'm assuming you are talking about me. I didn't re-open the thread. As a mod, I have the ability to post in a closed thread, and did so without realizing it was closed. As for what was posted, I sited a local source, which based on the format seems to be part of the USA Today network, which tends to lean right/conservative. Further, I posted as many reporting of actual quotes as I figured you'd dismiss the source just by seeing it. Perhaps I should have included a Newmax article also quoting the city manger saying there is no evidence of the accusations. Would you have accepted that? As for your critique of the media organizations you listed above, they tend to be considered middle of the road by those to study media. In fact, around here most dislike CNN for being too conservative. Personally, I also tend to dislike MSNBC as they sensationalize (to the left) a bunch of their analysis. But, I did post as many quotes as possible, because there has to be a shared set of facts to agree upon if we are to have a reasonable discussion. (And I am not disputing that Haitians eat cats in Haiti. The situation there his horrible and desperate, and when one looks at various societies in similar situations, any animal is a food source. This differs from being here in the US where the situation they are in is not so desperate.)
Yup. There was a pro women against Trump video as well. Name just 1 Right that men have that women don't. Which a female who was recording was seen asking them outloud. In fact it's the opposite. Women are free from Selective Service. A Right that American males do not have. They literally have no idea why they are out there protesting.
How would we, or anyone else, know what his exact current plans are?? Do you really think he tells the public every tiny detail of all the plans he has?? Trump has said he wants to add many SMR nuclear plants. That's his current plan. How exactly he will do that remains to be seen because he won't take office until January. Adding a few thousand mini nuclear reactors throughout the country doesn't sound like its that challenging of a job though. So I don't know what you're going on about
It's funny because when people asked them similar questions in other threads, all their responses were "Go search on Google/you're too stupid/you're a nazi/My wife's boyfriend treats me bad". Weird people. The left is weird.
Women also were out in record numbers voting apparently and Trump won a landslide victory with no decreased mail in votes this time around. What are the odds that they miss the significance of what women want in this case?
I sometimes try to understand Liberals as to what their thought process is, but it's just baffling to me
They don't at all seem concerned that Kamala didn't talk about one of her policies except to say that she's not Joe Biden. Was that even a positive when it became clear that she was even dumber?
I saw this map. Honestly the margin of victory was likely greater and gives credence that 2020 was indeed stolen. Which brings me to another point, Trump says he will do away with No Voter ID. His policies keep rolling in. Stand back and watch him cook.
There is some early analysis that women voted local/state for abortion rights/access, but then voted Trump for President. The Harris campaign assumed that they would vote both for abortion rights/access and for Harris, and this turned out to be wrong. Again, the early analysis says that, as usual, the economy was the driving force, and it seems that people (women in this case) want a return to life under Trump 1 (and the prices under Trump 1. That seems strange as disinflation is really bad for the economy).
That would suggest that Trump saying abortion access would be left to the State was an effective strategy, while all Harris was really doing was stating she wasn't Biden or Trump. What do you think of that 60 minute interview that was manipulated?
This was absolutely crazy and troublesome; you had Walk, Harris, Kerry, Hillary Clinton, and Bill Gates saying this or similar on video. Think it or discuss it in private but to actually tell a nationwide this is just dark.
It's incomplete - Nevada doesn't require voter ID but went for Trump, as an example of information that is missing from that picture.
Do you know anything about connecting thousands of these small nuclear reactors to the energy grid? No of course you don't. None of you do. What gives you the confidence, then?
I DON'T KNOW!!! I don't pretend to know how!!! That's my f.ucking point!!! I voted for a candidate who also doesn't know how, and will delegate the responsibility for making those decisions to people who do know how. The candidate you support honestly believes he knows better than nuclear engineers. The billionaire backers who prop them up honestly believe they know better than nuclear engineers. On what grounds other than the Peter Principle is beyond me. There's an entire reddit page called Self Aware Wolves. It's literally about people like you asking questions like the one you just have, and getting soooo close to the point and still not getting it. Check it out. You won't understand a single thing.
And that's one. Any more states had No Voter Id and voted Trump? Point was more states with No Voter Id's voted Harris/ Walz.
When and where has Trump said he knows better than nuclear engineers?? Got a link for that?? Cause thats news to me
To @Rabuki's point about female voices being heard.... Numerous US College Womens Volleyball teams are forfeiting their matches against San Jose State who field a transsexual player. Donald Trump will protect his female constituents as he promised while upholding deserved Rights for gays, which he also promised. Everybody wins. Biological females have spoken.