Already listed on his Wikipedia page. It seems, based on that page, that he and the orange idiot have a lot in common:
He's also the douchebag who convinced Trump to pardon war criminals -- that, of all the shit Trump did, is the thing I find most reprehensible.
They didn't vote for machismo in 2016 nor 2020 (wouldn't say Biden gives off the mach vibe as much as Trump). The one difference from 2016, and maybe my memory serves me wrong, but the non-binary gender / transexual issue wasn't as pronounced in culture as a topic of political discussion. Otherwise, it's a combination of economy and immigration as far as I can tell. It would be interesting to see if there were a lot of new Latino voters or if the turnout was about the same.
Trump announces Elon Musk to lead 'Department of Government Efficiency' with Ramaswamy https://www.npr.org/2024/11/12/g-s1...maswamy-doge-government-efficiency-deep-state
Listen up, children And today’s word is…. pic.twitter.com/7EZw1BOl7T— Marlene Robertson (@marlene4719) November 12, 2024
Hannity has to be getting a SC seat at this rate Pete Hegseth: Princeton, Bear Stearns, Harvard, Koch Brothers puppet, tried to convince Trump to go to war with Iran in 2020. I hate to break this out again, but https://t.co/QoXi9DuQNZ pic.twitter.com/Mr5TrtqeQz— Nougat Hand Bank (@WireRacing) November 13, 2024
https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/12/politics/kristi-noem-homeland-security-secretary/index.html Kristi Noem is going lead Homeland Security. At least we'll be safe from all the dogs.
Trumpism in one clip here’s pete hegseth, fox news host and trump’s pick for secretary of defense, nearly killing a drummer with an axe on live TV pic.twitter.com/b1RHmVz6vZ https://t.co/qkpekjqnIQ— Marlow Stern (@MarlowNYC) November 13, 2024
Hegseth called for the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs to be fired a couple of weeks ago on some podcast. Gen Brown is highly respected in the Pentagon and was nominated by Trump. I never thought I'd see the day when someone less qualified than Chris Miller would be SECDEF, but here we are.
Maybe a liddle too on the nose Analysis | Trump’s top priority in an attorney general is shielding himself from criminal prosecution. He should choose Merrick Garland.— New York Times Pitchbot (@DougJBalloon) November 13, 2024
“And which great efficiency expert will lead this important new effort to streamline?”“Actually there will be two people in charge” pic.twitter.com/tgYhHUrbKQ— Alex Byers (@byersalex) November 13, 2024
Nothing that we didn’t already suspect. Russia made an audacious public attempt to blackmail the incoming U.S. president, according to a military expert. Vladimir Putin and his ministers are already trying to mess with Donald Trump's head when Kremlin intelligence chief Nikolai Patrushev claimed in an interview that Trump had "relied on certain forces" to win a second term in the White House and warned that he had "corresponding obligations" that he was "obliged to fulfill," wrote Slate columnist Fred Kaplan. "This is a mind-blowing bit of psychological warfare!" Kaplan wrote. "The Russians are basically telling Trump: We put you in office. Now it’s time for you to pay us back. Did this make Trump wonder: WTF?"
As usual, the commentators are dumb. Trump doesn't think or wonder. The Russians are dumb, as usual, because they picked the one guy who famously never pays his debts.
He's a ********ing pathological narcissist. He would never believe for a moment that he only won because of outside help. Already did. When new people show up trolling like he did, I sometimes check their posting history. Sure enough in an October 31 post he was calling MAGA Trump supporters idiots, or something along those lines. Confirmed that he is no doubt just some teenage male here to troll - nothing more, nothing less.
That's over in the Trump Supporter thread. Because while the candidate you support "won" -- you are all still gullible losers. Which is what Trump was counting on. You're going to love how much winning you're in for.
I buy into the analysis that Hispanics are starting to look at what the political parties can offer them in a purely transactional manner. Which is a good thing. People shouldn't have any loyalty to a party, but should always be asking what party can deliver more for them. That's how democracy is supposed to work.
Of course that makes them much more susceptible to misinformation, which we are starting to see with people that voted Trump to protect Palestinians and will see with immigrants getting their citizenship revoked and then deported.
Yup. I see this as the flip-side of being a group that requires active appeal, rather than the presumption of being a safe vote. If they are in play they need to be treated as such. The Trumpies made some successful (if dis-/misinformative) inroads, so going forward the Dems need to do some zero-based budgeting and explain why Latinos (in this instance) should see Dems as their best home and hope. The appeal needs to be affirmative, making a case, countering bullshit, not just ticking an identity box (which is actually not even one box, it's almost like Latinos come from totally different countries and traditions).