My last name starts with "J". I would tell students to call me Mr lastname, Mr. J, or, if daring, "Jeffe." It was always fun when students first took the risk to call me "Jeffe."
I’m only on page ten…and I am laughing at the redactions (I think trumps team missed the deadline to propose their own and that’s why we got DoJ’s version, Smith: on this tweet sent by trump on [exact date]…he said exactly this and mentioning CC1, CCx, P’s 1,7 9 and 12. Or “CCx, who served as trumps chief of staff on [exact date] I’d be willing to bet 80-90% of the redacted names are easily identifiable.
I think it's more than that. I think that every redacted name can be identified pretty easily. Page 11 has "P9 had known P13, the defendant's son-in-law..." - who the heck could P13 be? How many sons-in-law could the defendant have? I don't think Tiffany, sorry, should redact that, I don't think D2 was married at the time so it might be D1's husband? Maybe? Seth Abramson has already started identifying everyone on his substack, which I do not subscribe to, but I'm pretty sure he will have them all by tomorrow.
In response to [redacted] who posted on the social media platform BigSoccer, in a thread titled “The Post Presidency::[sic] Trump faces the Music Thread” post number 9804….i agree.
And that didn’t take long The List, Jack's version! https://t.co/gOmGz5kgrr— Badd Company (@BaddCompani) October 2, 2024
Meadows (P7 and P21) and Raffensberger (P22 and P33) get multiple identities. I'm guessing others do as well.
Yeah, this is all news to faux news I'm afraid and let me tell you, they were shocked when they heard.
Fun with names. My surname is Welsh or solid British. Which was interesting when I came here to find that quite a number of black footballers have the same name. Now it’s even getting popular as a given name. ( guess I can’t call it a Christian name any more, even if it is. )
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/po...ntenced-9-years-tampering-election-rcna173807 Tina Peters, Trumper, Mesa County Clerk recorder, election denier, conspiracist, and general see you next Tuesday was just sentenced to 9 years and remanded immediately upon sentencing. The following 13 minutes are well worth your time. A judge who gets the seriousness of these “non-violent” offenses that are orders of magnitude more damaging to the people. One day, perhaps later this year,perhaps next year….Trump will be sitting in front of a judge in the same situation. My only hope is that the first judge past the post takes the 13 minutes to listen to this. 1841913003366875431 is not a valid tweet id
Brutal. And for the pre-sentensing impact statements, Peters called Former Republican Elbert County Clerk Dallas Schroeder. Who is Dallas Schroeder, you ask? https://www.cpr.org/2024/10/03/tina-peters-former-mesa-county-clerk-prison/ Schroeder was sued by the state over copies he made of Elbert County’s election machine hard drives around the same time as Peters.
A President Trump will pardon her next year. Or the Supreme Court will overturn her conviction on a 6-3 vote, citing bias in the legal system against lawbreakers.
Although there are specific items in the list of offences she' was charged with which aren't relevant, couldn't a lot of that be said about Trump as well??? All the stuff about the damage she did to the electoral process are also true of him, aren't they?
Gorsuch, I believe is responsible for the 10th circuit which includes Colorado. But that responsibility (as is the same for all the Justices) only entails taking the lead on certain motions filed out of that circuit and then recommending disposition to the other justices. He doesn't hear cases on his own in case that's what you're asking. Also, this was a state conviction (unless I read it wrong). So it would have to wind it's way through state appellate process before getting into federal courts via a habeas petition or something---which is a very long shot.
This is why the NY, GA and now this CO state case are important, because it is a bunch harder for the corrupt SCOTUS to f******** with, which is why Roberts pushed that awful POTUS immunity ruling to shield Trump. All the brown shirts are still subject to the rule of law until “their guy” is POTUS.
I don’t know about the judge…but about a minute into it I closed my eyes and pictured trump sitting there. Hopefully this will serve as a warning to any of next month’s potential ******** arounders that the find out part really really sucks. Oh…and next time it won’t be garland sitting in the AG seat (spaghetti monster willing). You ********ers better not miss this time.