As an ex subject matter expert, the problem with the VASH program is NOT underfunding. From what I saw, it’s OVERfunded. We, the people, can’t force people who choose homelessness to get a voucher and an apartment. Housing authorities can’t spend the money they’re allocated because there is always more money than need…unless we as a society want to force homeless veterans to take a voucher. We’d have to treat them like we treated mental patients 50-60-70 years ago, basically the same way we treated prisoners. There is no way on God’s green Earth an elected official is going to do anything other than max out spending on homeless vets, so VASH always has more funding than it can use. As a practical matter, we have solved the problem of veteran homelessness for vets who want a voucher.
Considering what Carr said this weekend, not so sure. Or perhaps he's just mad about the questions being asked and the social media clips being distributed.
A far bigger issue for homelessness is not funding. This country has money. Rather, it's one of ceez's favorite subjects: it's zoning. I have a lot of experience working with the homeless and what I think the biggest issue is that there are a lot of people for whom an entire apartment is beyond their span of control. Most of the folks I have worked with in shelters and homeless encampments want nothing more than a large room. Something that will fit a bed, allow them to hang a TV on the wall, maybe a dresser. In New York, that would called a loft. Anywhere else and it doesn't meet zoning. Know what would make a great homeless shelter? One of those 1950s era strip motels on the side of old, pre-interstate, highways. A private bath is a plus. Tiny Homes Villages – Hope the Mission OK, these homes are really small, but you get the idea. But you can see how they'd have to be specifically zoned. And it doesn't really have to be an issue, I think. Call this a pre-homelessness solution. Lots of folks can afford $200 or $300/month for rent. A lot of people can budget. What they can't do is save. So if someone has disability or social security, they can make $700 last a month, but what they cannot do is set aside $300 for five months so that they can afford the security deposit and first month's rent. My wife works a shelter now and she finds that about 5% can create a plan and have the long-range thinking skills to see it through. So, let's make housing more attainable by making the actual houses more attainable. Edit: and god bless to Tim Dills. He tried to convince me of this 30 years ago, but he was so wacky (i.e. he wanted to build these houses out of bales of straw to keep costs down) that I discounted him and I've been running in place ever since. RIP Tim. Edit: OK those units in the vid are too small. I think the ability to invite someone into your home is foundational, so these would fail. This is more transitional. If you make it too nice, you eliminate the desire for people to leave. What I am thinking is more of a long-term solution. Make them three times bigger and add a front porch and that can be long term. This is now affordable housing!
In Chicago they still had these "rooming house" style apartments twenty years ago, even down to shared facilities. Of course most of the market there was a lot cheaper than other large cities even then.
I looked at a couple of them when I was moving there for grad school. Turned out, my teaching assistantship rendered me ineligible on the grounds of too much income.
@Val You are very correct about homelessness in general, but not in terms of veterans. If a veteran isn’t housed, it’s because he chose that life. the parking lots and major plumbing and electric lines and the rest are useful. The buildings can’t be converted.
Why can't they be converted? Is it something to do with the physical property? Or is it zoning? Something else?
Think about what an apartment complex looks like, and what a shopping mall looks like. Which walls and doors etc would you keep from a mall to jump start an apartment building?
It would be cheaper to bulldoze mall buildings than to try to incorporate sewer drainage, plumbing and electrical into individual units you would be trying to build in a mall. Of course our resident architect could post more knowledgeably on this.
Apartments around the outside of anchor stores, lightwell in middle. Use the closed shops for amenities. Lots os space.
He's for real. The plumbing and electrical are not set up for it. You'd have to cut the slab to install new lines underground. Exterior walls need to be redone. Each unit needs a window or egress, which malls definitely won't allow for. (some buildings solve this buy having an interior courtyard. Each unit needs it's own electrical. None of these things are impossible, but often it is easier and cheaper to tear down the mall than to retrofit it. Edit: refresh! @song219 was all over it.