Howard Kurtz recently got fired from a job because he wrote an article filled with inaccuracies. So, naturally, Fox has hired him.
Here it is, from Bloomberg. Not the Daily Currant or Andy Borowitz. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-20/fox-news-hires-howard-kurtz-disgraced-media-reporter.html Fox News hired media critic Howard Kurtz, who recently came under fire for errors in his reporting, as an anchor of a new version of “Fox News Watch.” Kurtz will also serve as a media analyst on several other programs and write a regular column on FoxNews.com, the News Corp. (NWSA) subsidiary said in a statement. CNN currently features Kurtz on its “Reliable Sources” program, which will continue to air with other hosts after his last show on June 30. Kurtz, who spent 29 years at the Washington Post before serving as Washington bureau chief for the Daily Beast and Newsweek, has drawn scrutiny for errors in his reporting. On May 2, the Daily Beast retracted a blog post about NBA player Jason Collins that claimed the player wasn’t forthcoming about his engagement. Kurtz left the Daily Beast after the retraction. In November 2010, Kurtz apologized to readers for posting a story that appeared to be an interview with Republican Congressman Darrell Issa, when in fact he had only been communicating with one of his spokesmen. Salon puts it in context... http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/howard_kurtz_joins_foxs_board_of_journalism_ethics_experts/
http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2...chusetts_senate_race_and_why_it_mattered.html This is interesting. It's an email from Charlie Cook, who is a pretty famous, respected electoral prognosticator. You've gotta love the irony...Fox News made its viewers stupid but it's a fool me once, don't get fooled again situation. If you read the whole article, Crossroads GPS and others decided that they can't ask big donors to pay up again and lose by a big margin, and they decided that they had to pass on the Gomez campaign because their next big push HAS to be competitive, preferably a winner.
These are people who believe that they know more than PhD scientists about climate change. And they can't and won't look at a flipping poll.
This one is wack - I love it for the sheer derangement. It might even be true in part, but that doesn't mean that it's not deranged.
I did that once to an (obvious) American in the Milan train station. This overweight guy wearing shorts, sneakers, a T-shirt and straw cowboy hat came up to me and said, "Where cain Ah git me sumfin' t'eat?" I looked at him blankly for a second, and he said "Aw hail, yew cain't speak English, cain you?" I replied in a fake, generic "foreign" accent, "Ah, yis, a lee-tell bit..." He repeated his question, this time a few decibles louder, just to make sure I understood him. Knowing full well that there was a freakin' Wendy's less than 50 feet away, I carefully pronounced my words in a way that would have made my mythical English teacher proud, "There are minny restaurant near-bah." Apparently, this was not detailed enough, as he asked again, still louder, pointing to his wide-open mouth and emphasizing the word "eat." I repeated myself, and he got disgusted, turned around and walked away. I hope the bastard starved to death!
A bay Area fox affiliate commenting on Asiana flight 214 which crashed last saturday. How can anyone be this stupid?
I guess there's some truth in what was said in Anchorman, that a news anchor will read anything that comes across the teleprompter
They are blaming a summer intern. Really, blame the unpaid. How about entrusting your reputation to real, salaried, employees?