I think it's important for a country not to overspecialize. Specialization introduces efficiencies and increases overall wealth, but it's almost always to the benefit of a few, and more importantly it creates a more brittle society that can't handle changes well, or even at all.
Using PVC is kind of crazy. It's harder and more brittle than polystyrene, and it's harder to glue. Epoxies don't stick well to PVC and solvent glues are nastier and don't work as well as with styrene (which is why this person didn't and used superglue). I can see its use in some places - it's super cheap compared to styrene modeling stock. I think it's hard mode in a hobby that is already plenty difficult.
I do understand what you're saying, but this would be impressive even with easy plastic to work and glue. He may well be doing it because he wants to show that the process doesn't have to be expensive. In any case, I'm not cynical enough about it to see the specific choice of material as some kind of flex. Not quite, anyway...
I mostly build kits, but I do scratchbuilding too. Here's something I've been working on for a while. It's a 1/700 scale Ishikari-class destroyer-escort, used by the Japanese Self Defense Force in the 1980's and 90's. It's about 5 inches long. I'll start painting soon, but I have to fix something with the lifeboat launchers.
ISM Manufacturing survey. Index down from prior month, and from estimates. So are inventories. Otherwise fairly stable.
Philly Fed Manufacturing survey Once again, and up and down pattern presenting. But what has analysts attention is the employment number which is up fron 2 months ago, but very much down from last month. Per Marketwatch (which I think is Factset), esimates of the top line were -4.5, so a very big improvement.
Good numbers. I think the most important employment number that I never see a lot of people talk about is underemployed people. Conservatively the workforce is at 25 percent underemployed, but I've seen numbers at 30%. The fact is if you don't know someone underemployed in 2026 in America's economy I would question how many people you know under the age of 40. I know a girl with a Masters Degree working at Lowes.
Canada agrees to cut its 100% tariff on Chinese EVs in return for lower duties on Canadian farm products, in a break with the U.S. Mark Carney slashes Canada's 100% tariff on Chinese EVs and announces that up to 49,000 Chinese electric cars will be imported into Canada with only a 6.1% tariff. In return, China has agreed to slash tariffs on canola imports from 84% to 15% by March 1. . 2012102780740059212 is not a valid tweet id
Rumblings that Peter Navarro wants Canada kicked out of the five eyes because Carney acknowledged China within the new multipolar world and praising XI leadership - more small D energy from the White House
Are Canada demanding a "to sell a car in Canada you have build a car in Canada" policy ? Or are they just gonna open their legs to the Chinese ?
Opening our legs, in exchange for the Chinese dropping tariffs on our Canola and seafood. We had no choice due to Trump. (Good job Trump on driving us, your previously faithful neighbor, closer to China). The good news though is that it's a quotafir Chinese EVs, less than 20% of our total EV market, which isn't huge. It's up to 49,000 cars annually.
Only a small amount ... but that's letting the foot in the door. Exporting agriculture at the cost of deindustrialization isn't great in the long term though. I get it Canada is in a tough spot with Trump. I am not sure what the plans of the current car makers operating in Canada are with all the tariff chaos. That is an industry that does provide jobs for Canadians. Just wondering if Canada is gonna make the same demand from China that they made from the Americans and Japanese in the past (at least from the understanding I have). Maybe not in the short term, but at least in the medium.
I'm happy this throws Tesla and that smug Musk under the bus. Interesting characterization of our attempt to diversify away from an entitled and arrogant nation openly declaring that it wants Canadian economy destroyed and annexation. This smug attitude is exactly why the world can't stand the US.
Trump flat out said he want the Canadian auto industry destroyed. Diversification is the only path and we can't afford to wait around to see if the senile pedophile is bluffing
That's fine. If your car industry is going away anyways, then might as well go for the lowest priced product. Just pointing out if you don't make the same type of demands from the Chinese, you're not really diversifying your industry ... you're just diversifying your imports. BYD built a plant in Brazil, so I don't see why Canada (if not at first) at some point makes that a requirement. Just not sure what kind of leverage you'd have down the line.
I think that may still happen down the line, but we're easing in until we figure out the CUSMA renewal and get past your mid terms. We're taking steps, but methodically with room to maneuver again.
I don't know nuthin' about nuthin' but if Canadians are even thinking about the midterms, you're doing it wrong. The Democrats could crush the midterms and win the next presidency but eventually the Republicans will win again and it's going to be even more painful for you. You're kicking the can down the road but the road is getting shorter.
People toss out nonsense corporate-speak to see if it flies with co-workers It all started when an X user named Tomie shared what would go on to become a hugely viral post: "I've started saying nonsense phrases at work like 'that's neither cheese nor cheddar' just to see my coworkers nod seriously like they understand." Daniel Berk added a few of his own: "Let's not microwave the lasagna on this one." "We might be polishing the doorknob instead of opening the door." "This feels like we're alphabetizing water." "Let's not put racing stripes on a parked car." "That's a lot of garnish for no entrée." "We're measuring the shadow, not the object." https://www.upworthy.com/made-up-business-idioms
That’s a lot of garnish for no entree is pretty good. Or will be if I’m around people who don’t need to be told what a garnish is.
No, we're doing it right. The US is too unreliable for us to be thinking that way. The sooner we pivot, the better we'll do down the road. 2012428378901549147 is not a valid tweet id
People over rate the immediate importance of these trade agreements and tariff rates. I appreciate not everyone was balls deep in Brexit for years to learn all this stuff but nothing will get de-industrialised in the short view. The main point here is that Canada, and indeed all the trading bloc, can't rely on their arrangements with the US anymore, because trump is ripping up the agreements for the umpteenth time this year. Investment can't work on that basis. Also the US itself is not being tough on China, and Trump is trashing the advantage north america + EU had over china.So the whole posture vs China for a huge trading entity like the EU may no longer make sense. Trade with China is structurally a huge issue, but China is reliable to this point as a partner which the US isn't So I don't see any other move that one back towards China for a new trading order. China has obviously played it's cards much better than the US over the last year and now is set to dominate multiple critical industries because the US decided to destroy its own position. Congrats everyone!